AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > 2.3 and SVO Mustang > 2.3L Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | 2.3L Talk | 2.3L Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 09-12-2007   #1 (permalink)
fox81 is offline Apprentice


Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 111 Threads: 28
 fox81's Country Flag  View fox81's 11 photos
Oracle   Arizona
Default Will it out run it?

I've heard that the 2.3L w/turbo will out run a 69 BOSS Mustang down the quarter mile. Is that true?
fox81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007   #2 (permalink)
EagleAutosports is offline Forums Moderator

4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 34,197 Threads: 151
 EagleAutosports's Country Flag  View EagleAutosports's 546 photos  View EagleAutosports's 3 classified ads  View EagleAutosports's 1 products for your review  View EagleAutosports's HomePage
Graham   North Carolina
Send a message via MSN to EagleAutosports Send a message via Yahoo to EagleAutosports
Default

Uh, no. The 1979 Turbo 4 had 131 hp, 150 hp for 1980, 145 hp for 1983, 1984, and 205 for the SVO's 1984 to 1986. The Boss was rated et 370 hp but it was way over 400, in fact close to 500. Even though the Boss wasn't designed for drag racing, it could be coaxed into the low 13's easy. A Turbo 4 can't do that.
__________________
MOOG Certified Tech.
For mods and sound clips, see profile and gallery.

Ask me why I ran "only" a 13.54.

Member: NMRA
Member:
White Mustang Registry #362
Member: Fuzzy Dicer
EagleAutosports is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007   #3 (permalink)
fox81 is offline Apprentice


Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 111 Threads: 28
 fox81's Country Flag  View fox81's 11 photos
Oracle   Arizona
Default

I read that it could somewhere. But was some what skeptical about it.
Since stock these cars have only 88hp and the Boss has 400hp. Now I know, thanks!
fox81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007   #4 (permalink)
74stang2togo is offline Forums Moderator

Mustang II Member
2.3L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,373 Threads: 170
 74stang2togo's Country Flag  View 74stang2togo's 8 photos  View 74stang2togo's HomePage
Central   Texas
Send a message via AIM to 74stang2togo Send a message via Yahoo to 74stang2togo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fox81 View Post
I read that it could somewhere. But was some what skeptical about it.
Since stock these cars have only 88hp and the Boss has 400hp. Now I know, thanks!
Stock the n/a 2.3s have between 88 and 109hp depending on the year and which state they were sold in. Stock turbo 2.3s ranged from 130 to 210 (1988 Tbird T/C).

A stock-for-stock race between either of the '69 Boss cars and the fastest 2.3 Turbo cars ('86 Mustang SVO and '88 Thunderbird Turbocoupe) would be close, the Boss 302's power was all top-end, and the Boss 429 was a seriously de-tuned version of the NASCAR & NHRA dominating race version. Both Bosses would be in the mid-to-high 13s with a good driver and the best possible options and conditions where as the SVO could see mid-to-high 14s and the Thunderbird Turbocoupe would see high 14s/low 15s... half a second to two seconds seems like a lot, but you've got to consider that the 2.3L engine is ONLY 140 cubic inches, less than half of the Boss 302, and less than a third of the Boss 429...

Then, of course there's the 1971 Boss 351... but you didn't ask about that...
__________________
1976 Ford Mustang II Ghia: 302 with a 600cfm Edelbrock carb, Edelbrock Performer 289 intake, Dynomax Blackjack headers, 2.5" exhaust with Flowmaster Super 44s. RJS 11-gallon fuel cell, C4 tranny, chrome 16" pony wheels, fuzzy dice, brown vinyl half-top, and painted in the tackiest color ever (harvest gold, that's why I call it "The Goldenrod").

Also have a 2003 Dodge Ram (lightly modded daily driver/tow rig/office/dining room/home away from home/workshop... I call it "The Big Blue Dawg".)
74stang2togo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007   #5 (permalink)
My'StangOpens is offline Rookie

2.3L Member


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 30 Threads: 2
 My'StangOpens's Country Flag
Northeast   Pennsylvania
Default

74stang, do you know how much hp the n/a 2.3s made to the wheels in 87?

88 is fly, im jus wondering..
My'StangOpens is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2007   #6 (permalink)
EagleAutosports is offline Forums Moderator

4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 34,197 Threads: 151
 EagleAutosports's Country Flag  View EagleAutosports's 546 photos  View EagleAutosports's 3 classified ads  View EagleAutosports's 1 products for your review  View EagleAutosports's HomePage
Graham   North Carolina
Send a message via MSN to EagleAutosports Send a message via Yahoo to EagleAutosports
Default

90 @ 3800 rpm. That's to the rear wheels.
__________________
MOOG Certified Tech.
For mods and sound clips, see profile and gallery.

Ask me why I ran "only" a 13.54.

Member: NMRA
Member:
White Mustang Registry #362
Member: Fuzzy Dicer
EagleAutosports is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007   #7 (permalink)
My'StangOpens is offline Rookie

2.3L Member


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 30 Threads: 2
 My'StangOpens's Country Flag
Northeast   Pennsylvania
Default

90 horsepower? on a stock 2.3?

really? lol

i thought they had around 90 at the fly
My'StangOpens is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007   #8 (permalink)
sleeper_inc is offline Made Member

2.3L Member


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 584 Threads: 8
 sleeper_inc's Country Flag
Regina Beach   Saskatchewan
Send a message via MSN to sleeper_inc
Default

88HP at the crank, then you need something like 15-20% drag (trans, rearend, etc)

Total - ???
__________________
The sad thing is, with 15 PSI, straight back exhaust, and a bobs log, it still feels slow...

Maybe 20PSI, new computer, new 3" VAM, and some porting will make it faster

For pictures of my build-up on "No Hands" PM me
sleeper_inc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007   #9 (permalink)
fox81 is offline Apprentice


Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 111 Threads: 28
 fox81's Country Flag  View fox81's 11 photos
Oracle   Arizona
Default

My ride has 88hp. When I'm at a light, turns green the other cars are passing me cause I can't hit a decent speed in like what 30 seconds.
But I don't even want to know how much power goes to the wheels cause it will make me hate it even more.
__________________
1981 Mercury Zephyr
1996 Nissan Altima
fox81 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007   #10 (permalink)
dollarbill is offline Senior Member

4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,120 Threads: 64
 dollarbill's Country Flag  View dollarbill's 13 photos
Decatur   Illinois
Default

Which Boss? In 69 I think they had the 302, and 429 but I don't see a stock turbo 4 even coming close to either.
__________________
DHG #01434 Bullitt - full JLT intake, MGW shifter, Accel coils (I wish I had 4.10s, o/r H, tune)
Black 89 LX(the drag car) best 8.75 at 80 mph in the 1/8
97 Mountaineer V8 AWD
dollarbill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2007   #11 (permalink)
My'StangOpens is offline Rookie

2.3L Member


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 30 Threads: 2
 My'StangOpens's Country Flag
Northeast   Pennsylvania
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fox81 View Post
My ride has 88hp. When I'm at a light, turns green the other cars are passing me cause I can't hit a decent speed in like what 30 seconds.
But I don't even want to know how much power goes to the wheels cause it will make me hate it even more.

at 15-20% power loss, anywhere from 70-75 hp to the wheels

My'StangOpens is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2007   #12 (permalink)
J. Rhapsody is offline Made Member

2.3L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 444 Threads: 29
 J. Rhapsody's Country Flag  View J. Rhapsody's 4 photos  View J. Rhapsody's 2 classified ads  View J. Rhapsody's HomePage
L-Ville   Kentucky
Default

Actually the carbed 2.3 like in mine makes 88 the fuel injected ones make about 120 or so
__________________
Foxy lady Roxanne 1981 2.3 hatch
Jax Rhapsody his life as a...
J. Rhapsody is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2007   #13 (permalink)
chenmp is offline Rookie

2.3L Member


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 37 Threads: 3
 chenmp's Country Flag
Fridley   Minnesota
Send a message via AIM to chenmp
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fox81 View Post
I've heard that the 2.3L w/turbo will out run a 69 BOSS Mustang down the quarter mile. Is that true?
I guess if we are talking stock cars or if the 2.3L was modified, i've seen some clips on-line of 2.3 turbo cars pulling mid to low 9's in the quarter... so yeah i spose it could but if they were both stock i don't think it could have a chance.
__________________
92 notch 2.3 N/A

Pacesetter long tube header, Magnaflow High flow cat, Flowmaster Deltaflow 40 series, ported upper and lower intake manifold, EGR breather, CAI from mustangsunlimited.
chenmp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007   #14 (permalink)
Yan_Jin is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 156 Threads: 34
 Yan_Jin's Country Flag  View Yan_Jin's 6 photos
Bowie   Maryland
Send a message via AIM to Yan_Jin
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Rhapsody View Post
Actually the carbed 2.3 like in mine makes 88 the fuel injected ones make about 120 or so

i believe u may have it backwards, from what i know the older 2.3 engines...when carbed, and more HP than the FI model. I got the 87 at 88 hp. i know that the 90.....91? yea 1991 is where they find 109 or so hp.

but if im not mistaken the pinto had basically the same engine and a little more power....
__________________
As you may have guessed- I'm a young gun with dreams of pimpin' my baby 2.3n/a into a fire-breathin Shadow Runner.
so far:
1987 hatchback mustang
2.3L, replaced to a '89
Air silencer removed
t-5 all the way
1400 watt sound system w/ twin 12" chrome subs
-The shadow runner was a legendary chinese horse that could outrun its own shadow[/size]
Yan_Jin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007   #15 (permalink)
J. Rhapsody is offline Made Member

2.3L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 444 Threads: 29
 J. Rhapsody's Country Flag  View J. Rhapsody's 4 photos  View J. Rhapsody's 2 classified ads  View J. Rhapsody's HomePage
L-Ville   Kentucky
Default

If you check my cardomain page I have alota info on the early foxes
__________________
Foxy lady Roxanne 1981 2.3 hatch
Jax Rhapsody his life as a...
J. Rhapsody is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
engine does not run right mustanglx9050 5.0L Tech 3 01-10-2008 08:24 PM
Chicagoland Poker Run and Dyno Day for 2005+ Mustangs dekujala 2005-2009 Mustang Talk 3 04-19-2007 03:09 PM
4.88 in 85gt 8.8 cant run a full 1/4 4.11? blueracecar Drag Racing 7 03-23-2007 11:17 PM
88 mercury cougar 3.8 liter V6 swap to a 86 ford mustang 5.0 liter V8 cranks wont run nadaquehacer85 5.0L Tech 3 02-24-2007 02:31 PM
What octane gas should I run in my 4.6 2002 Mustang GT? Kevin62773 4.6L Tech 103 03-30-2003 10:26 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112