AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > 2.3 and SVO Mustang > 2.3L Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | 2.3L Talk | 2.3L Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 10-09-2007   #1 (permalink)
fionndruinne is offline Rookie

2.3L Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18 Threads: 5
 fionndruinne's Country Flag
Coquille   Oregon
Cool 1989 Mustang Wondering about Ideal RPMs When Driving

Hey folks. I've got an '89 2.3l, and since it has an RPM gauge, I've paid attention to it, and it has me wondering.

Is there an ideal RPM range for best gas mileage and engine life? Does lower RPM automatically equal better mileage, or is there more to it?

I notice at around 45 MPH, when my automatic transmission shifts into overdrive, the RPMs end up at under 2,000. At 65 MPH, which is about as fast as this car goes without an undue amount of coaxing/flooring/cussing, the RPMs are around 2,500-3,000. Is this range a waste fuel-wise? And is it hard on the engine?

Thanks for imparting any wisdom on this almost car-illiterate padawan.
fionndruinne is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007   #2 (permalink)
My'StangOpens is offline Rookie

2.3L Member


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 30 Threads: 2
 My'StangOpens's Country Flag
Northeast   Pennsylvania
Default

nooo the lower RPMs are better for gas mileage

the more you floor it (making the RPMs rise) the worse your gas mileage will get

jus let your auto do its thing, you'll be fine (tho, if you really want better gas mileage get a manual)

however, stop and go traffic is always hard on your engine. highway driving is the healthiest for your engine
__________________
Up and coming 2.3 site, come check it out sometime http://ford23.eamped.com/
My'StangOpens is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007   #3 (permalink)
74stang2togo is offline Forums Moderator

Mustang II Member
2.3L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,381 Threads: 170
 74stang2togo's Country Flag  View 74stang2togo's 8 photos  View 74stang2togo's HomePage
Central   Texas
Send a message via AIM to 74stang2togo Send a message via Yahoo to 74stang2togo
Default

Lower RPMs is ALMOST always better for mileage... there is a such thing as being too low...

My '87 GT had the factory 2.73 gears when I bought it... and around town the poor thing was a slug and got about 6mpg... replaced everything (literally, engine, tranny, all sensors, tune-up parts, filters, computer, K&N filter, aftermarket exhaust) still didn't break 8mpg in town... nor did it ever hit 1900rpm unless I just stood on it... I could get 28mpg on the highway all day long, and on a really good day even more than that... but in town it sucked gas worse than my old big-block T-bird... Put 3.55 gears (raised the RPMs in town substantially, usually ran 2000-2800 while moving) and doubled my mileage to 12-16 consistently, and I only lost 1mpg highway, was a great tradeoff!

If you're looking to change the RPM range you drive in, gears are the way to do it, but you've got to know what gear you've got and how big a move you want to make.
__________________
1976 Ford Mustang II Ghia: 302 with a 600cfm Edelbrock carb, Edelbrock Performer 289 intake, Dynomax Blackjack headers, 2.5" exhaust with Flowmaster Super 44s. RJS 11-gallon fuel cell, C4 tranny, chrome 16" pony wheels, fuzzy dice, brown vinyl half-top, and painted in the tackiest color ever (harvest gold, that's why I call it "The Goldenrod").

Also have a 2003 Dodge Ram (lightly modded daily driver/tow rig/office/dining room/home away from home/workshop... I call it "The Big Blue Dawg".)
74stang2togo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007   #4 (permalink)
fionndruinne is offline Rookie

2.3L Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18 Threads: 5
 fionndruinne's Country Flag
Coquille   Oregon
Default

Alright, so lower RPMs equal better mileage, so I thought. But... that means I'd get the best fuel economy at about 45-50 MPH!
How... fun.
fionndruinne is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007   #5 (permalink)
74stang2togo is offline Forums Moderator

Mustang II Member
2.3L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,381 Threads: 170
 74stang2togo's Country Flag  View 74stang2togo's 8 photos  View 74stang2togo's HomePage
Central   Texas
Send a message via AIM to 74stang2togo Send a message via Yahoo to 74stang2togo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fionndruinne View Post
Alright, so lower RPMs equal better mileage, so I thought. But... that means I'd get the best fuel economy at about 45-50 MPH!
How... fun.
Generally true... my '75 Chevy pickup gets 16+mpg even with a 400 cubic inch engine that's built with all the goodies driving about 50-55mph... nice even 2200rpm for her, still just on the front two barrels of the carburetor; My Dodge Ram gets 28.9mpg at 50-55mph (found that out in a 40 mile construction zone, I'd gassed up right before I hit it, and it's onboard fuel mileage computer was showing 29.5mpg so I gassed up to see if it was right... damn close... and damn depressing since I get about 19mpg at 70mph!)
__________________
1976 Ford Mustang II Ghia: 302 with a 600cfm Edelbrock carb, Edelbrock Performer 289 intake, Dynomax Blackjack headers, 2.5" exhaust with Flowmaster Super 44s. RJS 11-gallon fuel cell, C4 tranny, chrome 16" pony wheels, fuzzy dice, brown vinyl half-top, and painted in the tackiest color ever (harvest gold, that's why I call it "The Goldenrod").

Also have a 2003 Dodge Ram (lightly modded daily driver/tow rig/office/dining room/home away from home/workshop... I call it "The Big Blue Dawg".)
74stang2togo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007   #6 (permalink)
dawrr is offline Senior Member

2.3L Member
4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,574 Threads: 123
 dawrr's Country Flag  View dawrr's 16 photos  View dawrr's 1 classified ad
Northeast   Connecticut
Send a message via AIM to dawrr
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fionndruinne View Post
Alright, so lower RPMs equal better mileage, so I thought. But... that means I'd get the best fuel economy at about 45-50 MPH!
How... fun.
Not necessarily...

Without getting into complex math and crap, let me try to explain this simply and quickly.

The higher the RPM, the more gas you consume (typically). IF you mash it at a low rpm and let off at a higher rpm, you may actually use more gas at the lower rpm. For our purposes, lets assume you are using cruise control.

At 55 mph, your rpms are around 2000, right?
At 65, you're around 2400...

At 55 mph, you're using less fuel in the same amount of time, but at 65 mph you're covering 18% more distance in the same amount of time.

To find your ideal speed/rpm, simply drive at a single speed on the highway for about 20 minutes after filling up. Calculate your gas mileage. Do it again for another speed. Do it again at another speed. Eventually, you'll find an ideal rpm. But, with your car, you're probably not going to see much of a difference.

That's a good thing
__________________
--2000 Mustang GT--
Going for 800hp in 2009
dawrr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007   #7 (permalink)
fionndruinne is offline Rookie

2.3L Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 18 Threads: 5
 fionndruinne's Country Flag
Coquille   Oregon
Default

Ahh, alright, that makes sense. I had wondered about the RPM/speed to time ratio, and whether it made much of a difference.

How about the health of the car's innards? Is it going to put more wear on my engine if I habitually drive at 2400RPMs/65MPH than at, say, 1900-2000RPMs/50MPH?

Obviously, how late I am for work dictates how fast I drive most of the time. Heheh.
fionndruinne is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2005+ V6 Mustang... Bad drone from new dual exhaust blackbeast07 2005-2009 V6 Mustang Tech 11 11-17-2007 07:25 AM
Mustang GT ... need FRPP GTA muffler install help superman112 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 17 10-02-2007 06:48 PM
2005 Mustang GT... Please help me identify and repair T3650 transmission sensor 5twenty 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 8 10-02-2007 01:43 AM
Thinking about a custom exhaust for my Mustang GT S197GTGRIFF 2005-2009 Mustang Talk 16 09-28-2007 02:36 PM
1991 Mustang Fly Wheel cjemera 5.0L Tech 7 07-26-2007 09:12 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112