How to Get more power out of 2.3L - Ford Mustang Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 05-07-2012 Thread Starter
Rookie
2.3L Member
 
mr306's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 47
 
Question How to Get more power out of 2.3L

How can I get more power out of a 2.3? The first things that come to mind are turbocharging and getting a new cold air intake. But where can I find parts that will fit?
mr306 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 05-07-2012 Thread Starter
Rookie
2.3L Member
 
mr306's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 47
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr306 View Post
How can I get more power out of a 2.3? The first things that come to mind are turbocharging and getting a new cold air intake. But where can I find parts that will fit?

i also thought of nitrous but i'm not sure that would be healthy for my engine
mr306 is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 05-07-2012
PONY Member
2.3L Member
 
evintho's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Santa Rosa
Posts: 552
 
Cool

Here's your answer right here..............
1983 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe 5sp

135K......it's barely broken in! Offer him $1000, go up to $1200 if you have too. Swap the motor into your 'Stang and part out the rest of the TC. You'll make your money back in no time. (I just parted an '87 TC for $2800.......bought it for $300).
The factory TC motor has twice the horsepower of your N/A 2.3 right outta the box! The TC motor will have a 60/63 T3 turbo (which is good). Add a 3" exhaust, browntops, CAI and couple of other minor mods and you'll be pushing 300 hp without batting an eyelash!

'89 LX ragtop with turbo'd TC motor - Thunderstang!
'86 Turbo Coupe (daily driver)
'88 Turbo Coupe (parts car)
evintho is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 05-07-2012
BOSS Member
2.3L Member
 
TOM RENZO's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Danbury
Posts: 3,905
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by evintho View Post
Here's your answer right here..............
1983 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe 5sp

135K......it's barely broken in! Offer him $1000, go up to $1200 if you have too. Swap the motor into your 'Stang and part out the rest of the TC. You'll make your money back in no time. (I just parted an '87 TC for $2800.......bought it for $300).
The factory TC motor has twice the horsepower of your N/A 2.3 right outta the box! The TC motor will have a 60/63 T3 turbo (which is good). Add a 3" exhaust, browntops, CAI and couple of other minor mods and you'll be pushing 300 hp without batting an eyelash!

????????????? 300 HP do you know it is quite expensive to get that type of wheel ponies from a 2.3 and do you know the HP of a 1983 TC is like 145 TOPS!!! Tough call and expensive to accomplish. The 300 HP magic number from a 2.3 is not cheap. But it is definitely a start and with an 83 the entire engine other than the short block has to be DUN OVER. Peace Tom

HAVE YOU DRIVEN A FORD LATELY!!!

"As I lay rubber down the street, I pray for traction I can keep, but if I spin and begin to slide, please dear God protect my ride"

I SPEND MONEY I DON'T HAVE, TO BUILD CARS I DON'T NEED,TO IMPRESS PEOPLE I DON'T KNOW.
TOM RENZO is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 05-07-2012
PONY Member
2.3L Member
 
evintho's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Santa Rosa
Posts: 552
 
Cool

Tom,
Maybe I was a little overzealous. I was trying to motivate the newb! Yes, I'm aware reaching 300 hp at the wheels would be expensive. I never specified wheel hp. That's probably around 375 flywheel hp.
The reasoning for my post:
mr306 is probably of the younger generation and is looking for 'fast and cheap'. His ride will most likely be street driven with emphasis on impressing friends and ladies.

mr306, please don't take any offense by me talking about you like you're not here! We're just a couple of old farts respectfully disagreeing with each other!

Tom, yes the '83 was 145 fresh off the showroom floor and I'm sure it's lost a good 20% hp since then but it's still quite a bit more than his N/A 2.3. I'm sure some good headwork would be needed, log or header, fuel system upgrades, yada, yada, yada. My point to mr306 was to 'go turbo' and there's no easier way than to swap from a donor car. 135K is fairly low mileage for an almost 30 year old car and it's in his backyard for a very reasonable price. I'm aware of your credentials and I'm sure you're aware of mine, also. Just trying to clarify my post. God Bless.

'89 LX ragtop with turbo'd TC motor - Thunderstang!
'86 Turbo Coupe (daily driver)
'88 Turbo Coupe (parts car)
evintho is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 05-08-2012
BOSS Member
2.3L Member
 
TOM RENZO's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Danbury
Posts: 3,905
 
John No issues i know you better. I was just posting some info on the cost of an older 2.3 that is lacking in many areas for HP gains. I truly understand where you were going. Those early TC were a little disappointing to say the least. Later models with IC better computers and intake and exhaust systems would be a plus. But dipping in to a turbo 2.3 either way is a good choice. Peace Tom.

Note 306 me and JOHN go way back and we respect each other HONEST. Just some feisty CHIT CHAT Thanks God Bless JOHN Peace Tom

Note JOHN is spot on about the GARRETT. Totally a plus over an IHI !!!!!!!

HAVE YOU DRIVEN A FORD LATELY!!!

"As I lay rubber down the street, I pray for traction I can keep, but if I spin and begin to slide, please dear God protect my ride"

I SPEND MONEY I DON'T HAVE, TO BUILD CARS I DON'T NEED,TO IMPRESS PEOPLE I DON'T KNOW.
TOM RENZO is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 05-09-2012 Thread Starter
Rookie
2.3L Member
 
mr306's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 47
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by evintho View Post
Tom,
Maybe I was a little overzealous. I was trying to motivate the newb! Yes, I'm aware reaching 300 hp at the wheels would be expensive. I never specified wheel hp. That's probably around 375 flywheel hp.
The reasoning for my post:
mr306 is probably of the younger generation and is looking for 'fast and cheap'. His ride will most likely be street driven with emphasis on impressing friends and ladies.

mr306, please don't take any offense by me talking about you like you're not here! We're just a couple of old farts respectfully disagreeing with each other!

Tom, yes the '83 was 145 fresh off the showroom floor and I'm sure it's lost a good 20% hp since then but it's still quite a bit more than his N/A 2.3. I'm sure some good headwork would be needed, log or header, fuel system upgrades, yada, yada, yada. My point to mr306 was to 'go turbo' and there's no easier way than to swap from a donor car. 135K is fairly low mileage for an almost 30 year old car and it's in his backyard for a very reasonable price. I'm aware of your credentials and I'm sure you're aware of mine, also. Just trying to clarify my post. God Bless.
hey that's fine. i dont care what people say. and your 100% right about everything. and are you sure about 300hp? even if that would work it sounds expensive.
mr306 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Tags
turbocharging 2.3l

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182