AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > 2.3 and SVO Mustang > 2.3L Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | 2.3L Talk | 2.3L Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 04-08-2007   #1 (permalink)
HalfPackLX is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 137 Threads: 33
 HalfPackLX's Country Flag  View HalfPackLX's 2 photos
Keizer   Oregon
Default what compression ratio is my 1989 Mustang 2.3l?

What is the compression ratio on my 1989 2.3l mustang?
How much do i need to have the head milled for 10:1 compression?
__________________
God Bless You
HalfPackLX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007   #2 (permalink)
74stang2togo is offline Forums Moderator

Mustang II Member
2.3L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,381 Threads: 170
 74stang2togo's Country Flag  View 74stang2togo's 8 photos  View 74stang2togo's HomePage
Central   Texas
Send a message via AIM to 74stang2togo Send a message via Yahoo to 74stang2togo
Default

Bone stock most EFI 2.3s that were non-turbo had about 9:1 to 9.5:1 compression depending on year.

As far as how far to have it milled, you'd have to talk to a machine shop.
__________________
1976 Ford Mustang II Ghia: 302 with a 600cfm Edelbrock carb, Edelbrock Performer 289 intake, Dynomax Blackjack headers, 2.5" exhaust with Flowmaster Super 44s. RJS 11-gallon fuel cell, C4 tranny, chrome 16" pony wheels, fuzzy dice, brown vinyl half-top, and painted in the tackiest color ever (harvest gold, that's why I call it "The Goldenrod").

Also have a 2003 Dodge Ram (lightly modded daily driver/tow rig/office/dining room/home away from home/workshop... I call it "The Big Blue Dawg".)
74stang2togo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007   #3 (permalink)
HalfPackLX is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 137 Threads: 33
 HalfPackLX's Country Flag  View HalfPackLX's 2 photos
Keizer   Oregon
Default

Thanks, for the info. I thought it was around 9:1. When I bring the engine in for machining I'll just tell them what I want.

__________________
God Bless You
HalfPackLX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007   #4 (permalink)
artistang is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 233 Threads: 19
 artistang's Country Flag  View artistang's 75 photos
Sewanee   Tennessee
Default

OK, I'll take a stab at this one, just follow the bouncing ball....LOL

Basicly, "static" compression ratio is the ratio of the "swept volume"(stroke) divided by the "volume at TDC". Also taken in consideration is the "head gasket volume", "dish/dome volume"(dish is positive volume, dome is negative), "head volume", and "deck volume".

Assuming your stock compression ratio is 9.0-1 and you have a 2300 cc or 140cuin motor and "deck volume" is the only thing you want to changeby shaving the head....

Each cyl displaces 35 cubic inches. Using the above formula (and knowing the bore and stroke of a 2.3l/140cuin is 3.44" x 3.70") we can calculate the "volume at TDC".

"volume at TDC"= "swept stroke volume"(pi X r2 X H) divided by Compression ratio
= [3.1416 x (1.72" x 1.72") x 3.70"] / 9.0
=3.82 cuin "volume at TDC" stock 9.0-1 compression ratio (A)

to get the "volume at TDC" in a 10.0-1 compression ratio, substitute 10.0 into the formula
= [3.1416 x (1.72" x 1.72") x 3.70"] /10.0
= 3.43 cuin "volume at TDC" with 10.0-1 compression ratio (B)

to get to 10.0-1 compression ratio, substract B from A and you need to lose .39 cuin.

By shaving the head, the only place you can "lose" "volume at TDC" is in the "deck volume"...

"Deck volume is (pi x r2 x "deck height" Or "deck clearance")

Now, we can substitute and calculate how much "deck height" you must lose.

[3.1416 x (1.72" x 1.72")] x "deck height"= .39 cuin
"deck height"= .39 cuin / [3.1416 x (1.72" x 1.72")]
=.39 cuin / 9.29inin
=0.041981"
or rounded off, "deck height" loss to achieve 10.0-1 compression ratio from 9.0-1 is 0.042" . (or 1.1mm for the metric geeks)

A shop manual is necessary to know how much "deck height" can be safely removed from a 2.3l. .042" is quite a bit and you may wind up "out of service limits". If you do have it shaved, be sure to turn the motor over by hand after assembly to insure proper piston/valve clearance. Also, make sure the head bolts (I assume the 2.3l has head bolts and not studs) are not "bottoming out" to insure a good head gasket seal.

Note: As I said before, this will give you the "static" compression ratio. You must also take your cam into consideration because extended valve opening/overlaps can reduce your "effective compression ratio". "Static" compression ratio and cam choice must be considered as a system!

good luck!

Hope I ain't bored everyone by doing the calculations (which I did not double check) on line, but I aint had that much fun in years and it shore brought back memories.........

Memories of when I didn't check piston to valve clearance by hand before firing off an engine.........
artistang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2007   #5 (permalink)
HalfPackLX is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 137 Threads: 33
 HalfPackLX's Country Flag  View HalfPackLX's 2 photos
Keizer   Oregon
Default

well thanks for all the calculations. I should copy it to a word document so I don't loss the info. I will have to think it over and do the calcs. I do plan on putting a higher lift cam in it.
__________________
God Bless You
HalfPackLX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007   #6 (permalink)
artistang is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 233 Threads: 19
 artistang's Country Flag  View artistang's 75 photos
Sewanee   Tennessee
Default

Please notice I said....Assuming your stock compression ratio is 9.0-1...

Do not take these figures litteraly. It is to only show you how to calculate amount of material to be removed. Since you are adding a cam into the mix, I would only remove enough material to bring the head to factory specs (flat) and think about increasing the compression ratio in another fashion......such as dish/dome pistons. You can also add a stoker crank, but you would probably have to have some machining on the block to create rod clearances. Either way, be sure to check piston-valve clearances. I think I stated in another thread that .100" piston-valve clearance for straight shifts and .070" for automatics. (I will check on myself there). The extra clearance for the straights is that if you miss a shift and the valves float, you won't wind up with an oil pan full of scrap metal.
artistang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007   #7 (permalink)
HalfPackLX is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 137 Threads: 33
 HalfPackLX's Country Flag  View HalfPackLX's 2 photos
Keizer   Oregon
Default

yeah I figured I'd find out my compression for sure first then do the math. I will be buying forged pistons. Probably from racer walsh. So I may as well call them when I'm ready to buy and ask them about what they know also. They deal with a lot of 2.3l and 2.5l setups.
__________________
God Bless You
HalfPackLX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1997 Mustang GT... 70mm throttle body question rbailey1010 4.6L Tech 11 04-08-2009 02:53 PM
S197 Mustang GT... Disappointing dyno results Nukedood56 2005-2009 Mustang Talk 58 03-04-2009 02:24 PM
2001 Mustang GT... Need advice on installing new head bolts Dendro_4.6 4.6L Tech 10 10-27-2008 03:59 PM
2006 mustang GT... Need help with tuning. knarfmustang 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 62 04-26-2008 01:46 AM
2005 V6 Mustang... Need help with mod desicions Martinez1708 2005-2009 V6 Mustang Tech 17 11-07-2007 03:47 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112