Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_canuck999 Hey all, I'm sort of new to the modding, but next week I'm looking to get in a new exhaust + probably some other stuff like intake, and anything else that might help. I've been trying to find how to do a dual exhaust setup, does anyone have any good ideas ? Now, intake wise, do I just switch the air box with a 9" (I think) K&N Cone Filter, or is there more to it / better ideas ? Also, any other suggestions on some relatively low cost mods that increase performance/power would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance. |
Alright;its been said lots before, speed costs and how much do u want to spend. Also what are your goals expectations out of your Mustang.
I havn't found anyone making a dual exhaust setup for a 2.3 altgough there may be some out ther. I made my own Cat-back dual exhaust
syatem using Cherry Bomb glasspacks, a tail pipe , a Y pipe and some other misc parts. Cost roughy $200.00. It dosen't sound bad, bur hard to notice any preformance improvement wiout some mearsuments. A
cat-back sys like that on this eng probably only gives you mabey 10 hp
gain, if that.
Another good optionIs to find an engine out of say a 83 or so Ford
Crown Victoria. get a carbed one. You can get one used for about $300.00 if u shop around. Stock they're about 145 hp, but thats a good gain for the money. Also a reliable hp gain w/ a good engine. Your state emissions may be a factor here
For an intake manifold on the 2.3 eng I'd go with the cone K&N to about a 3" pvc to the Throtle body. Try adapt it to cold air if u can.This step will eliminate removing the air silincer found on other post on this board.
Also a 65mm Throttlebody from (I think a 94 or 95 V6 must) will help.
Amost forgot, removing wire from knock sensor ( located on underside
of intake manifold helps a lot.
These are just some of the thing you can do, there are others of course, like cam, head, underdrive pullys and others i may have forgotten about.
I woudn't expect much if any hp gain out of spark plugs and wires, mostly for reliability at higher rpms. If your still undecided, read other posts on this board. Some good ideas here. I don't know if there are any correct methods here or not. some just better than others for what u want.. Janstang