[aznjpnboi86]

Well, I called and spoke with Edelbrock about those numbers and they said that it is right on. They said expect 20-25% loss with an automatic and the fact that I am using a Mustang Dyno kind of smashs those numbers too. Oh, my baseline dyno for my Mustang before the Edelbrock was 232 RWHP and 242 FT/LBS. So I gained around 122 RWHP & 81 FT/LBS on 6.5psi of Boost. I am using Edelbrock's canned tune because John at Horsepower Ranch said there was tuning involved. I might go to a local Dynojet to see what those numbers are.

[sixers007h]

Wow those stock numbers are super-low, for a mustang dyno or not. You might have a lemon.

[jaja6009]

That sucks it baselined so low. Maybe get a custom dynotune in the future and throw on a smaller pulley.
Good Luck!

[RetroGT2006]

Wow those numbers are damn low for a baseline and even for a blown GT with 6.5lbs! That stinks bro, sorry to hear.

[stlwagon]

Originally Posted by aznjpnboi86

Well, I called and spoke with Edelbrock about those numbers and they said that it is right on. They said expect 20-25% loss with an automatic and the fact that I am using a Mustang Dyno kind of smashs those numbers too. Oh, my baseline dyno for my Mustang before the Edelbrock was 232 RWHP and 242 FT/LBS. So I gained around 122 RWHP & 81 FT/LBS on 6.5psi of Boost. I am using Edelbrock's canned tune because John at Horsepower Ranch said there was tuning involved. I might go to a local Dynojet to see what those numbers are.

You apparently got one of the low HP stock motors so those FI numbers aren't too bad afterall.

[stlwagon]

Originally Posted by sixers007h

Wow those stock numbers are super-low, for a mustang dyno or not. You might have a lemon.

I've seen them dyno as low as 232 on an automatic.

[mustangdave2008]

I think a good custom tuner could really help you.

[toddan]

a custom tune is a must and I really wouldnt count on the Edelbrock until the car has been tuned . My Whipple gained about 40hp and 45 torgue from the tune and the car drove totally different