AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > 2005 + Mustang > 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
 
Introductions | Lounge | 2005+ GT Tech | 2005+ V6 Tech | 2005+ Talk | Mustang Tech | Racing | Regional 
 

Reply
 
Old 10-19-2009   #1 (permalink)
aznjpnboi86 is offline Rookie


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 19 Threads: 10
 aznjpnboi86's Country Flag
Renton   Washington
Default E-Force Supercharged! Long Tube Question!

Hi everyone, I am wondering a few things about my current set-up. First, I am running the stock base 5psi kit and am running an Automatic. I am at 370RWHP & 360FT/LBS. I commute 60 miles a day and would like to drive with this set-up for at least 3-4 more years. Also, one of the local shops said that he would put jba longtube headers with a jba catted x-pipe to reduce pressure on the motor.

How much more hp and torque I can add before I should be concerned about reliability for both Motor and Transmission?

Will these headers really reduce the pressure enough to where it will make the motor last longer?

Can I get away with the stock manifolds?
aznjpnboi86 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #2 (permalink)
KDT
KDT is offline Made Member

S197 Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 310 Threads: 18
 KDT's Country Flag  View KDT's 5 photos
North Central   South Carolina
Default

You are only at 5 psi right now. I am assuming that you are running the conservative tune that comes with the kit. With that in mind, I would say you are very safe with your current setup. Longtubes will lower your boost by relieving some backpressure. At 5 psi, I would say by maybe a lb or so in the upper rpms. I know that a set of Kooks LTs will drop around 2 psi on a system that is over 9 lbs. They will also definately increase horsepower and torque. I would say at least a 20 rwhp gain in your application. I would surely consider adding them. Only drawback, you will have to get another tune when you add them. Sice your car is a daily driver, I would stay at you current boost level. Your tune is the most important thing concerning the longevity of you motor. I personally would not go more than 10psi on stock internals, especially on a daily driver. My car is not a daily driver (so far about 2500 miles per year) and I am only going with around 7.5 lbs of boost.
__________________
08 GT 5 spd Man. SCT X3 w Bamachips 93 perf. tune, FRPP 3:73 gears, FRPP GT500 fuel pump, Dynotech alum. ds, Kooks LTs w X pipe, Steeda CAI, UDPs, cmcv del., lightweight radiator support, Tri-ax shifter, lcas, adj uca, adj panhard bar, Borla Stingers, H&R rear springs, Godspeed Omegas 18x9 fr/ 18x10 rear with Nitto 255/45 & 285/40s, Agent 47 mirrors, GT500 rear spoiler, CDC chin spoiler, billet upper and lower grills, sequential tail lights, tinted windows, FRPP Hoodpins, Supercharger soon !!
KDT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #3 (permalink)
jay_nice is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 58 Threads: 7
 jay_nice's Country Flag
Southern Oklahoma   Oklahoma
Default

You're the first person I've seen on a forum with the E-Force. With that being said, How do you like it?
jay_nice is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #4 (permalink)
hammerdown is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 101 Threads: 11
 hammerdown's Country Flag
Sierra Vista   Arizona
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay_nice View Post
You're the first person I've seen on a forum with the E-Force. With that being said, How do you like it?

I gotta ask the same question. I've had one on layaway since early July, I'll probably have it installed by late November early December timeframe and my car is a DD too.

BTW, did you upgrade your fuel pump system at all? If not, what are your A/F readings looking like in the upper RPM (4K +) ranges?
__________________
2008 Mustang GT/CS, 5M, Stock
(Edelbrock E-Force w/ FRPP GT500 Fuel Pumps on layaway - Only $1,137.08 left to pay).

"You can't create wealth by dividing it...
All you do is reduce everyone and everything to the lowest common denominator."

"2+2=5" - George Orwell
hammerdown is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #5 (permalink)
stlwagon is offline Site Administrator

S197 Member


Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 64,413 Threads: 677
 stlwagon's Country Flag  View stlwagon's 53 photos  View stlwagon's 4 classified ads
Southern   Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to stlwagon
Default

You don't need long tubes. The OEM manifolds are just fine. If you add headers, you will lose boost.
__________________
AFM Site Administrator
2005 Mustang GT
stlwagon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #6 (permalink)
jay_nice is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 58 Threads: 7
 jay_nice's Country Flag
Southern Oklahoma   Oklahoma
Default

^^ Thats true but for a DD it might be a better decision to relieve the strain on the engine.
jay_nice is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #7 (permalink)
shifter87 is offline Made Member


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 706 Threads: 27
 shifter87's Country Flag  View shifter87's 29 photos
Sanford   North Carolina
Default

I have to ask for the amount of money a S/C cost why are you keeping the HP so low when is the pully change coming. The block can handle a lot more than 370RWHP
__________________
2008 Mustang GT,125 NX Shot,3.73 gears,LFP aluminum Drivshaft,JLT INTAKE,BBK LT HEADERS AND H-PIPE,Ford Racing Rear Exaust,Steeda strut,93 Octane Street Tune from TillmanSpeed,93 Octane NOS Race Tune from Tillman Speed,B&M LCA, WOT Box, Comp Engineering 3 way adjustable rear shocks

Best ET 12.16 @ 117
upcoming MODS- C&L intake Manifold or FRPP Intake Manifold, STAGE 2 XFI™ SPR comp cams
shifter87 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #8 (permalink)
stlwagon is offline Site Administrator

S197 Member


Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 64,413 Threads: 677
 stlwagon's Country Flag  View stlwagon's 53 photos  View stlwagon's 4 classified ads
Southern   Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to stlwagon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay_nice View Post
^^ Thats true but for a DD it might be a better decision to relieve the strain on the engine.
What strain?? Headers really aren't going to help anything.
__________________
AFM Site Administrator
2005 Mustang GT
stlwagon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #9 (permalink)
jay_nice is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 58 Threads: 7
 jay_nice's Country Flag
Southern Oklahoma   Oklahoma
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stlwagon View Post
What strain?? Headers really aren't going to help anything.
The stress on the engine from the S/C is what I'm talking about. Since the headers will take some of the boost away it would help out with the stress on the engine.
jay_nice is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #10 (permalink)
sqidd is offline Senior Member

S197 Member


Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,460 Threads: 76
 sqidd's Country Flag  View sqidd's 116 photos  View sqidd's 1 classified ad  View sqidd's HomePage
South Eastern   Michigan
Default

Quote:
Hi everyone, I am wondering a few things about my current set-up. First, I am running the stock base 5psi kit and am running an Automatic. I am at 370RWHP & 360FT/LBS.

Find a new tuner

Quote:
Also, one of the local shops said that he would put jba longtube headers with a jba catted x-pipe to reduce pressure on the motor.


It's called Back Pressure

Whomever you talked to at that shop is trying to tell you what you want to hear so he can sell you some exhaust. By all means, you will see an improvement in HP and TQ but it will not add any provable (see below) life to your motor. And the HP/TQ gains are quite small when you look at them from a dollar per horsepower perspective. Exhaust is in the $150-200/HP range for a car with a blower. Economically that is a very bad ratio.


Quote:
How much more hp and torque I can add before I should be concerned about reliability for both Motor and Transmission?

About 80hp and 90ftlb


Quote:
Will these headers really reduce the pressure enough to where it will make the motor last longer?

Reducing backpressure technically will make life easier in the motor. But the claim of “last longer” is borderline lying. The length of time you warm your motor up in the morning will have a far greater effect on the life of the motor than the stock backpressure. In a scientific setting you would be hard pressed to prove that a reduction in backpressure will make the motor last longer. The rest of the car will be falling apart long before back pressure has any effect on your motor.

There is also not very much back pressure with the stock exhaust anyway. That’s why you don’t get big gains with headers, mid pipes and axle backs. Ford did a great job when they engineered the exhaust for the Mustang. It is not a 3rd Generation Camaro, that’s for sure (they have incredibly restrictive exhaust).


Quote:
Can I get away with the stock manifolds?

I am running 450HP right now through the stock manifolds and in the spring I will be running 650HP through them. I think its safe to say you will be fine with the stock manifolds.
__________________
Under Construction. Better, Stronger, Faster than it was before.
sqidd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #11 (permalink)
sqidd is offline Senior Member

S197 Member


Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,460 Threads: 76
 sqidd's Country Flag  View sqidd's 116 photos  View sqidd's 1 classified ad  View sqidd's HomePage
South Eastern   Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay_nice View Post
Since the headers will take some of the boost away it would help out with the stress on the engine.
The simple answer is no.
__________________
Under Construction. Better, Stronger, Faster than it was before.
sqidd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009   #12 (permalink)
jay_nice is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 58 Threads: 7
 jay_nice's Country Flag
Southern Oklahoma   Oklahoma
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sqidd View Post
Find a new tuner



It's called Back Pressure

Whomever you talked to at that shop is trying to tell you what you want to hear so he can sell you some exhaust. By all means, you will see an improvement in HP and TQ but it will not add any provable (see below) life to your motor. And the HP/TQ gains are quite small when you look at them from a dollar per horsepower perspective. Exhaust is in the $150-200/HP range for a car with a blower. Economically that is a very bad ratio.



About 80hp and 90ftlb



Reducing backpressure technically will make life easier in the motor. But the claim of “last longer” is borderline lying. The length of time you warm your motor up in the morning will have a far greater effect on the life of the motor than the stock backpressure. In a scientific setting you would be hard pressed to prove that a reduction in backpressure will make the motor last longer. The rest of the car will be falling apart long before back pressure has any effect on your motor.

There is also not very much back pressure with the stock exhaust anyway. That’s why you don’t get big gains with headers, mid pipes and axle backs. Ford did a great job when they engineered the exhaust for the Mustang. It is not a 3rd Generation Camaro, that’s for sure (they have incredibly restrictive exhaust).



I am running 450HP right now through the stock manifolds and in the spring I will be running 650HP through them. I think its safe to say you will be fine with the stock manifolds.
Quite informative. Thanks for the correction.
jay_nice is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009   #13 (permalink)
aznjpnboi86 is offline Rookie


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 19 Threads: 10
 aznjpnboi86's Country Flag
Renton   Washington
Default

To respond to post #3 & #4, I like my current system plus the fact that the supercharger runs efficiently at low boost pressure. I am using a KB BAP but throughout the dyno run, I maintained at 11.5 A/F so it is turned off at the moment.

To also respond to post #7, I am perfectly fine with where I am at now. Even though the car can withstand higher amounts of boost and horsepower, I am not one of these guys who runs 10 psi and 450rwhp. I have taken the philosophy that someone will always be faster and as long as I beat these ricers around here, that is all I care about. It seems like everyone is worried about rwhp but I am happy that I got 370rwhp on an automatic. My money is in my 69 Mustang 351w stroked to 408 which has about 600 hp. Thats why!
aznjpnboi86 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112