Jasper reman engine review - Ford Mustang Forum

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 11 (permalink) Old 03-14-2014
OneMoreMod
Guest
 
OneMoreMod's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Jasper reman engine review

I just picked up my 2005 GT yesterday after having a Jasper reman engine installed. I have to say that I'm really impressed with it so far. The engine arrived with steak seasoning in the crate as swag as well as fishing lures. The engine came with a nice light gray paint. It certainly looks better than the rusty metal that the stock Ford engine tends to look like after a while.

I've only put 60 miles on it but I can tell there are a lot of differences from stock. The first thing is that the engine is quiet. I don't mean like quiet quiet, but none of the usual engine knocks, rattles and ticks like they usually have. Since I bought the car at 40,000 miles, it always rattled at startup. It doesn't now. It's just smooth all the way. The throttle response is more smooth as well.

The car does pull a lot harder at takeoff than it ever did. I now wonder if my car ever ran correctly. Some of that is probably the new Exedy Mach 350 clutch, but I do notice a huge improvement in low end torque. It's really hard not to chirp in 1st gear. I am on an 87 tune right now during the 500 mile break-in period, so I don't know about high end power yet. I also lost my FRPP cams because I would have voided the warranty having them installed. I am only allowed to mod everything except for the long-block itself, which includes cams. So, I did lose the high end power the cams provided. I traded them for an FRPP manifold that hasn't arrived yet, so hopefully that may make up some of the difference in the high end.

So far, I am impressed with the quality of this reman and if you want a close to OEM engine that has improvements, I would recommend the Jasper reman.

I will write back as soon as the break-in period is over and I can go back to my 92 octane tunes and get the break-in oil out of the system.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 11 (permalink) Old 03-14-2014
SHELBY GT 350 Member
4.6L Member
S197 Member
 
JBert's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Central Massachusetts
Posts: 6,060
 
sounds good so far, thanks for the update


| 2010 GT coupe | Daily Driver with some Steeda and GT500 take-off stuff for the occasional track day
JBert is offline  
post #3 of 11 (permalink) Old 03-14-2014
OneMoreMod
Guest
 
OneMoreMod's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBert View Post
sounds good so far, thanks for the update
I've never driven a car that wasn't broken in before, but I can tell things are starting to loosen up. I thought I would have to relearn to drive my car, but it is starting to drive like it's old self again, only without the annoying squeaks, rattles and ticks from the engine bay. For whatever reason, the new engine seems to have cured the infamous center stack rattle problem.
post #4 of 11 (permalink) Old 03-15-2014
GT Member
 
T.Wayne's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,412
 
Good

Good to see you kept us posted. Like I said they have a pretty good reputation around here for fleet vehicles. It is good to know a option, besides a $5000.00 short block is available for us working stiffs.

T Wayne
T.Wayne is offline  
post #5 of 11 (permalink) Old 03-16-2014
OneMoreMod
Guest
 
OneMoreMod's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks T. Wayne. The more I drive the new engine the more I like it. It's a little torqueier (new word!) I think because of the higher flow oil pump. Since the VCT system is driven by oil pressure, it seems the car is more responsive because of it. It's like how you might fantasize your 4.6 as being in a perfect world, where there is no noise except the noise of a powerful motor. No ticks, clatters, no rattles, no waiting for the car to warm up to get rid of the noises, the transmission is even quieter (I thank Exedy for that) and the acceleration is MUCH smoother. I can't wait to get it on a dyno. I will post again once that happens. I don't anticipate that happening for a couple of months though.
post #6 of 11 (permalink) Old 03-16-2014
PONY Member
4.6L Member
S197 Member
 
FastStang14's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Location: Horizon City
Posts: 446
 
Garage
please keep us posted.
I was looking at a reman 5.4 to swap into my 96.

If the engines are good, I'll jump.
Beats the gamble of an ebay or junkyard motor.

2006 Mustang GT
JLT Series 3 CAI, Flowmaster ATs, OBX LTs O/R H, FRPP Hot Rods, FRPP 4.10 gears 91 Bama Tune, Steeda CMDP, Steeda UDPs, FRPP Cobra Differential.

Some cosmetics
FastStang14 is offline  
post #7 of 11 (permalink) Old 03-17-2014
GT Member
 
T.Wayne's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,412
 
Yes

Quote:
Originally Posted by OneMoreMod View Post
Thanks T. Wayne. The more I drive the new engine the more I like it. It's a little torqueier (new word!) I think because of the higher flow oil pump. Since the VCT system is driven by oil pressure, it seems the car is more responsive because of it. It's like how you might fantasize your 4.6 as being in a perfect world, where there is no noise except the noise of a powerful motor. No ticks, clatters, no rattles, no waiting for the car to warm up to get rid of the noises, the transmission is even quieter (I thank Exedy for that) and the acceleration is MUCH smoother. I can't wait to get it on a dyno. I will post again once that happens. I don't anticipate that happening for a couple of months though.
Yes keep us posted. That is how we all gain good fixes and solid MODS.

T Wayne.
T.Wayne is offline  
post #8 of 11 (permalink) Old 03-20-2014
OneMoreMod
Guest
 
OneMoreMod's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Jasper reman engine review-0320141942d.jpg

Here's pics of the engine bay after my manifold install.
post #9 of 11 (permalink) Old 03-24-2014
OneMoreMod
Guest
 
OneMoreMod's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Just went in for my 500 mile service. No issues, still running strong. I drove it out to Forks (yes, home of the insipid Twilight series) and it was a lot of fun. No issues to report at all.
GT Member
 
cman's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Chesteremere
Posts: 1,103
 
Using the stock cams over the FRPP cams is probably why you feel better low end torque. Cams with more overlap usually sacrifice bottom end torque in favor of more power in the higher RPM ranges.

Glad everything is going great.

2005 black GT premium (5spd) / GT500 front LCA/upper strut mounts / Koni Adjustable (yellow)shocks with Roush Springs / FRPP 4:10 rear gear / BMR rear UCA/LCA+relocation brackets / MGW Shifter / Bassani axle backs / Cervinis heat extractor hood and Ducktail spoiler / Carroll Shelby CS69 20x9/20x10 wheels / MSD Blaster 2 coils / Roush TVS2300 Supercharger+Brenspeed 560R upgrade / Exedy Mach 500 Stage 3 Clutch / Afco Dual Fan Heat Exchanger upgrade / JLT Catch Can / axle exchange one piece aluminum DS / Silly grin on my face every time I turn the key.
cman is offline  
OneMoreMod
Guest
 
OneMoreMod's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by cman View Post
Using the stock cams over the FRPP cams is probably why you feel better low end torque. Cams with more overlap usually sacrifice bottom end torque in favor of more power in the higher RPM ranges.

Glad everything is going great.
I think that is definitely part of it. I didn't have the cams on for long, maybe 3 weeks to a month at most. I think it still has more torque than even before I installed them. That being said, I probably wouldn't get those cams again. Maybe something like Comp NSR 127100 - 127200's or something less lopey that is less of a pain to live with.

I just think the car never really ran correctly because of oil system issues that were present when I bought it that also affected torque.
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome