2013 Mustang gt vs 2013 v6 - Page 4 - Ford Mustang Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Apprentice
 
Blazin' 302's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: San Jose
Posts: 230
 
V6 vs. V8? Auto vs. manual? Cloth vs. leather? Blah, blah, blah! :p

Configuration choices exist for the same reason that color choices do: to broaden appeal and increase sales. Ford could never maintain the line if all they built were purple Mustangs with V8s with automatic transmissions.

Besides, the six-cylinder Mustang has been with us since the beginning. Its current incarnation is easily the best ever and can blow right by many of the "muscular" V8s of yesteryear.

2013 GT Coupe Premium - Performance White/OTT Stripe
400A | 6AT | Comfort | Electronics | RSS+Security | Rearview Camera | Shaker Pro | 19s
3M Crystalline Tint | FRPP GT500 Axle Backs
Blazin' 302 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Apprentice
 
KC3333's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: midwest
Posts: 228
 
The Mustang's niche going back to '64 has been an affordable, fun to drive, sporty (not 'sports') car that seats 4. The originals were built on the Falcon chassis, Ford's Camry of the 60's - including the V8's, GTs, and Shelby's.

That's the definition of a Pony car. Some ponies are Muscle cars, some are not. 2011+ is the blurriest line between the 2 Ford has ever produced, and many of us responded by buying V6's.

Some buyers need a lower purchase price. Some lower cost of ownership via higher MPGs and lower insurance. Some bought the V6 for better handling. Some bought the V8 to win at the track or on the on-ramp, or to hear the throaty rumble.

Ford makes a car called Mustang that allows people with vastly different reasons for buying a car to end up in one model. We all bought the original and best Pony car ever made.



Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app

2012 Boss Yellow Blaze, Recaros/Torsen, Cover/Mats
2012 MCA PP Sterling/Lava 1/11/12 Order, 1/17 VIN, 2/19 Sticker, 2/22 Build Date, 2/26 Shipped, 3/16 ETA, Arrived 3/8, Delivery 3/9 (yeah!)
1979 coupe, turbo, Polar White, red deluxe interior, TRX
1967 convertible, Wimbledon White, red interior, Sport Sprint
KC3333 is offline  
Made Member
 
2011gt85's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: calgary
Posts: 788
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCA2011 View Post
Excellent point, considering THE VERY FIRST PONY WAS AN I6
I know all about the mustang history thanks, but still IMO there shouldn't be a v6 muscle car.


Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
2011gt85 is offline  
GT Member
 
cababah's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,305
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2011gt85 View Post
I know all about the mustang history thanks, but still IMO there shouldn't be a v6 muscle car.


Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
I am inclined to feel the same way but something tells me you and me might not be sitting in our GT's if it wasn't for Ford also making/selling the V6...

2011 Mustang GT 5.0 Coupe/Brembos/3.73

"I'm also 6'5" and 270 lbs. and could crush a person's bones with my bare hands"
-Jozsefsz


cababah is offline  
MACH I Member
 
Joenpb's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,630
 
Quote:
Don't mean to piss in your cheerios but I daily drive/commute my GT in SF/Bay Area traffic each day and always find a good use for the extra power.
Yeah I was off the mark on that comment, especially considering I have a few mods that squeeze a bit more power out of the V6.
Joenpb is offline  
Made Member
V6 Member
S197 Member
 
jonDwon's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: South
Posts: 416
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2011gt85 View Post
I know all about the mustang history thanks, but still IMO there shouldn't be a v6 muscle car.


Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
Well actually, a V6 isn't considered a muscle car. And why do you think there shouldn't be a V6 mustang? If there wasn't, your mustang would more then likely still have the old 4.6 with 300 hp.

2012 V6 Performance Package
jonDwon is offline  
Made Member
V6 Member
S197 Member
 
jonDwon's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: South
Posts: 416
 
Even the V8 isn't a muscle car, it's a pony car :p

2012 V6 Performance Package
jonDwon is offline  
PONY Member
 
3.73-11's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Location: Norcross
Posts: 586
 
some interesting comparison videos for those debating 3.7 vs 5.0. Cars stock for stock if you don't know how to drive and the 3.7 driver does you might get embarrassed, if both driver know what their doing and have similar gearing about .7tenths of a second difference for a base-base msrp difference of $7,000+
Modded vs modded eh and the gt DOES NOT cost only $4,000 more base-base or even optioning them the same.
An interesting article was that motor trend 3.7 perf pack vs a brembo pack car.
Despite hitting the limiter for over fifteen seconds a lap,
the v6 was only two seconds behind the 5.0








2013 mt82 3.7-spl del/sgm/charcoal/tech pack/recaro
Mods, 3.5"ant/dynomax mid exh/bronze tsws 245/50/18 kumho/sportline-pro kit&gt500 mounts/J&M phb/eibach lcas/redline/roush/sk&pedals/gt-wfg/cf blkout/license insert&upper grille, mustang sills, jlt/3.73s/steeda 93perf&sctx3, am mirrors&tlc/roof wing/open lower/stillen lip/steeda sts&bush/rtr'd rear
3.73-11 is offline  
Apprentice
 
joel12gt's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 64
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC3333 View Post
The Mustang's niche going back to '64 has been an affordable, fun to drive, sporty (not 'sports') car that seats 4. The originals were built on the Falcon chassis, Ford's Camry of the 60's - including the V8's, GTs, and Shelby's.

That's the definition of a Pony car. Some ponies are Muscle cars, some are not. 2011+ is the blurriest line between the 2 Ford has ever produced, and many of us responded by buying V6's.

Some buyers need a lower purchase price. Some lower cost of ownership via higher MPGs and lower insurance. Some bought the V6 for better handling. Some bought the V8 to win at the track or on the on-ramp, or to hear the throaty rumble.

Ford makes a car called Mustang that allows people with vastly different reasons for buying a car to end up in one model. We all bought the original and best Pony car ever made.



Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
Yep. They are all mustangs in the end.

EDIT and yea the 4k price difference I was using the 22k number they put out (which was probably a premuim) versus what I paid for my base which was 27k but they had one on the lot with no options (mine had 3.73 only) for 26k
joel12gt is offline  
MACH I Member
V6 Member
S197 Member
 
RickAKATed10's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: Highland
Posts: 2,541
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC3333 View Post
The Mustang's niche going back to '64 has been an affordable, fun to drive, sporty (not 'sports') car that seats 4. The originals were built on the Falcon chassis, Ford's Camry of the 60's - including the V8's, GTs, and Shelby's.

That's the definition of a Pony car. Some ponies are Muscle cars, some are not. 2011+ is the blurriest line between the 2 Ford has ever produced, and many of us responded by buying V6's.

Some buyers need a lower purchase price. Some lower cost of ownership via higher MPGs and lower insurance. Some bought the V6 for better handling. Some bought the V8 to win at the track or on the on-ramp, or to hear the throaty rumble.

Ford makes a car called Mustang that allows people with vastly different reasons for buying a car to end up in one model. We all bought the original and best Pony car ever made.



Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
Probably the best post in this thread.

2012 Mustang V6 Premium | Black on Black - SOLD
Options:6-speed automatic | pony package | HID headlamps | security package | reverse sensing system | comfort package
Build date: 5/12/2011 | Purchased: 6/7/2011
Mods: tape stripe delete | 20% tint | Dynomax SS cat-back exhaust (39507) | smoked side markers | Injen intake (PF9022WB)
RickAKATed10 is offline  
Banned
 
2012 IngotSilver 5.0's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 736
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by apocalypto View Post
Excellent post, but people still make ignorant arguments on what a muscle/Pony car is supposed to be.
Inaccurate post, because a pony car could be a muscle car but a muscle car does not have to be a pony car.
2012 IngotSilver 5.0 is offline  
Banned
 
2012 IngotSilver 5.0's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 736
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3.73-11 View Post
some interesting comparison videos for those debating 3.7 vs 5.0.
Seriously, putting up vids of V6's beating V8's is pointless. Because people could also post vids of stock VW Jetta's beating 11+ 300 hp V6's.

See what I mean?

Quote:
Modded vs modded eh and the gt DOES NOT cost only $4,000 more base-base or even optioning them the same.
There was a 6.3k diff in sticker price between my base 11 V6 auto and my base stick 12 5.0 Stang. But with rebates, I paid 28k for my 5.0 ...

Both cars are great values for their respective performance categories, why don't we just let it go at that.
2012 IngotSilver 5.0 is offline  
Apprentice
 
costang's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Boulder
Posts: 114
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2006GTfan View Post
Not a ton on the road besides the GT500, Corvette, Viper. All the other ones are Euro cars and exotics that cost tons more than a Mustang.
You seem to have forgotten the Boss 302...
costang is offline  
Apprentice
 
Tripleshot McC's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: Laguna Niguel
Posts: 242
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrado68 View Post
Exactly, the video description says it clearly: 2013 Mustang GT 5.0L with MT82 vs. 2013 V6 Mustang convertible with stock automatic transmission

This would be the maximum difference you can have between stock GT and stock V6

Honestly, a stock V6 vert auto is not a car that I would bring to the track at all (and I have one, so I know what I'm saying ). You need at least a race tune and get rid of the stock tyres, to have a proper launch.

Until then, I'm having a lot of fun with a great car, having the best performance for its class, great mpg, cool look and style.

Not everyone wants to bring his car to a track.
Right there with you my friend. I would never take my car to a track, no need to race it, i just love to drive it. And, when you only slightly break the speed limit, the whole world is my track! Oh yeah, and my road trips cost a lot less at 28+ mpg.

2015 Premium GT Vert/MT82/Ruby Red/401a/50th pkg/3:55s/Nav/Rev Sensors
Ordered 3/17, VIN 3/24, Built 4/17, Shipped 4/25, ETA 5/12/2015
Future Mods: MRT hood struts, 50th shift ball, 50th floor mats, 50th trunk mat, MMR reservoir tank, MMR sound tube delete, K&N Filter, Barton shifter & bracket, Tune
Tripleshot McC is online now  
GLOBAL MODERATOR
5.0L Member
S197 Member
 
slorydn1's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Location: New Bern
Posts: 5,999
                 
Garage
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripleshot McC View Post
Right there with you my friend. I would never take my car to a track, no need to race it, i just love to drive it. And, when you only slightly break the speed limit, the whole world is my track! Oh yeah, and my road trips cost a lot less at 28+ mpg.
Yeah, a whole $0.62* less than the 27.7 mpg road trip last week in my 5.0?

*4.8 miles difference over a 16 gallon tank at $3.569 (only use 93)=$0.62

I'll take the 100 ponies and call it good

Relax though, not bashing the 6, I just had to get that out there:smoke:


Hers:2012 Mustang GT Premium,6M,Kona Blue Exterior/Charcoal Interior, 400A, HID/Security Pkg ,Comfort Pkg.
His: 2014 Mustang GT Premium,6M,Sterling Gray Exterior/Charcoal Interior,400A, Reverse Sensing/Security Pkg, Comfort Pkg SMR# 3635
See both histories in New Garage
AFM GLOBAL MODERATOR
slorydn1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184