Discuss 2003 Mustang GT, Which Exhaust Setup of These 2 Should I Get? on AllFordMustangs.com, the place for Mustang enthusiasts.
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you
registering on our forum and making your first post.
#1 permalink
Rookie
4.6L Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts:
14
Threads:
3
Riyadh
2003 Mustang GT, Which Exhaust Setup of These 2 Should I Get? Greetings everyone.
Title says it, after research and thinking I ended up with these two Headers\Mid-pipe\Catback combinations that I've fallen in love with
:
1.
BBK Long Tube Headers,
BBK O/R X-Pipe,
Magnaflow MagnaPack Catback.
2.
Mac Long Tube Headers,
Mac O/R ProChamber,
Borla Stinger S-Type Catback
Thx!
#2 permalink
Apprentice
4.6L Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts:
233
Threads:
57
Chicago
Illinois
i vote first one
__________________
"Let me get this straight ... your honda has 1.8 liters where as my mountain dew has 2?"
#3 permalink
Made Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts:
366
Threads:
18
Watertown
South Dakota
i vote for #1 absolutely
__________________
1997 Blurple V6
#4 permalink
Senior Member
4.6L Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts:
2,588
Threads:
44
charlotte
North Carolina
Yeah go with #1, although it will sound pretty good either way.
__________________
-04 Mustang GT-Intercooled Kenne bell 2.1L supercharged @10psi, C&L cold air intake, mass air flow, Sumitt racing 75mm throttle body, Magnaflow catback with Bassani X-pipe, chip and dyno tuned, 3:73 gears, B&M short shifter, FMS lowering springs and UPR caster camber plates, UPR upper/lower control arms, UPR subframe connectors. Kumho 275 up front/Kumho XS 315 in rear. Currently 420RWHP/435lbtq
#5 permalink
Made Member
Classic Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts:
1,276
Threads:
2
Fall River
Massachusetts
You stand to gain more power, with number 2 it was proven in a shoot out in MM&FF, Mike. SCT Tuner.
#6 permalink
Made Member
4.6L Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts:
1,630
Threads:
42
Boxford
Massachusetts
im a fan of the 2nd. prochamber has a very nice sound and borlas give it a deep tone.
__________________
Procharged 2002 Mustang GT 5 Speed 351 rwhp
353 rwtq at
10 psi
Next summer looking to go with:
Bilstien shocks + struts, Lowering springs (brand still TBD (any suggestions?)), MM CC plates, front + rear sway bars, subframes, and upper and lower control arms.
Time to make the pony ride some rails
#7 permalink
Made Member
4.6L Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts:
1,128
Threads:
37
East St.Paul
Minnesota
i say #2
__________________
03 MUSTANG GT,4R75W KENNE BELL 2.1 S/C NON-INTERCOOLED 6PSI
#8 permalink
Rookie
4.6L Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts:
14
Threads:
3
Riyadh
guys check out these 2 clips:
#1
#2
so confusing, but till now i slightly prefer the 1st
#9 permalink
Made Member
4.6L Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts:
635
Threads:
42
Grovetown
Georgia
numba 1.....except i would go with bassani for the lts and mid pipe
from what i have read it is a much better quality...
__________________
04 Mustang GT: Flowmasters, 20% Tint -14.202 @ 97.67
06 GSXR600: New toy
#10 permalink
Made Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts:
393
Threads:
16
longmont
Colorado
bbk headers absolutely suck they stamp a dent in there tubes to clear the steering arm don't go with bbk u will hate them i sent mine back i have a bbk h though and its great but choose another set of headers man.. no joke so #1 witha diff set of headers
#11 permalink
Rookie
4.6L Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts:
14
Threads:
3
Riyadh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
gostriderblack bbk headers absolutely suck they stamp a dent in there tubes to clear the steering arm don't go with bbk u will hate them i sent mine back i have a bbk h though and its great but choose another set of headers man.. no joke so #1 witha diff set of headers
i prefer to have headers\midpipes of the same company just being extra cautious with fitment
#12 permalink
Made Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts:
393
Threads:
16
longmont
Colorado
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GeaTea i prefer to have headers\midpipes of the same company just being extra cautious with fitment
ya i put bbk mid on headmen l/t and i took some serious force to make em fit
#13 permalink
Apprentice
4.6L Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts:
233
Threads:
57
Chicago
Illinois
after the videos i still say number 1 but either way u cant go wrong
let us know which one you go with
__________________
"Let me get this straight ... your honda has 1.8 liters where as my mountain dew has 2?"
#14 permalink
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
2,033
Threads:
14
Tampa
Florida
Number 2 but just throw a Mac Catback on, MUCH cheaper than the Borls Stingers,also a Deeper Chambered Rumble plus equal or more power!
__________________
99 SVT Cobra-Stock Teksid Block .020 over,Balanced Rotating Assembly,Manley Forged Pistons & H Beam Rods,Forged Cobra Crank,Stock HCI,Total Seal Plasma Moly Rings,Federal Mogul Bearings,ARP Studs,Melling Billet Oil Pump,Mac O/R H & Durablack 2.5 Catback,JLT RAI,Vogtland 1.6 Springs,Maximum Motorsports CC Plates,Subframes,Steeda Tri-Ax,Nitto 555's,U7146 Predator,Custom Diablo Tune,Member 7 Quart Club! 314HP/307Torq
2003 Mustang GT, Which Exhaust Setup of These 2 Should I Get? 
:
