AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > 4.6 Mustang > 4.6L Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.

Reply
 
Old 02-12-2007   #1 (permalink)
braupe is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 521 Threads: 48
 braupe's Country Flag  View braupe's 20 photos  View braupe's HomePage
Arlington, Granbury   Texas
Send a message via Yahoo to braupe
Thumbs up 2001 Mustang GT beat a 350Z?

I keep seeing 350Z's around town and I want to race one pretty bad, but don't know if I cold take one. I know I could hang with one, especially reading the stats from an old motor trend I have. Supposedly I am just a pinch faster in stock trim. Anywho just looking for some input.
__________________
2001 Mustang GT-"GONE"
Bassani x-pipe Catted, Flowmasters, CAI, March UDPs, Steeda Tri-ax, Functional Hood scoop, Matrix lowering springs, Steeda C/C plates, Roush LCA, Alpine-9885 Head Unit.

2003 F150 Sport 4X4 4.6-SOLD
1999 F150 Xlt Flaresode 4.6-SOLD

2000 VW Jetta GLX VR6- God I miss my stang.
braupe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #2 (permalink)
Kyle F is offline Top Dog

5.0L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,367 Threads: 231
 Kyle F's Country Flag  View Kyle F's 63 photos  View Kyle F's 1 classified ad  View Kyle F's HomePage
Knoxville   Tennessee
Send a message via AIM to Kyle F Send a message via Yahoo to Kyle F
Default

You would lose. They have more power, beter gearing, and lighter weight. They are on par with a S197. Ofcourse this is assuming the person in the 350Z knows how to drive and is willign to push it.
__________________
2006 Mustang GT in Torch Red
C&L Intake, Evolution Performance Tune, Borla Axle Backs, Hurst Shifter, 4.10's, JBA Long Tubes, Prothane Engine Mounts, Steeda UDPs, FRPP Charge Motion Delete Plates

84 Bronco, 302 C6 on 32 10.50's
Kyle F is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #3 (permalink)
coolwaterblvd is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 975 Threads: 4
 coolwaterblvd's Country Flag  View coolwaterblvd's 10 photos  View coolwaterblvd's 4 products for your review
Sumter   South Carolina
Default

From what I have experienced is I think they are so afraid to race and find out they have waisted their money that you might not even be able get one to even line up. I have seen a few take off and have not been impressed. I think they do not take the car up into enough RPM's like they are afraid to blow up the car, because the redline is so high like the Honda S2000. I by no means am trying to knock the 03-04 cobras but I have seen the same thing with even modified ones that go beaten by slower cars because they don't know how or are afraid to redline the car to get the full potential. It is almost like most of the VETT guys, a lot of them wont even look at you for fear their 45K was waisted after getting beat by a guy with a less expensive car.
coolwaterblvd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #4 (permalink)
braupe is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 521 Threads: 48
 braupe's Country Flag  View braupe's 20 photos  View braupe's HomePage
Arlington, Granbury   Texas
Send a message via Yahoo to braupe
Default

I guess ill wait until i get 4.10's. I did see one run at the track. He ran a 9.0 in the 1/8th. But I also saw one run a 8.8.
__________________
2001 Mustang GT-"GONE"
Bassani x-pipe Catted, Flowmasters, CAI, March UDPs, Steeda Tri-ax, Functional Hood scoop, Matrix lowering springs, Steeda C/C plates, Roush LCA, Alpine-9885 Head Unit.

2003 F150 Sport 4X4 4.6-SOLD
1999 F150 Xlt Flaresode 4.6-SOLD

2000 VW Jetta GLX VR6- God I miss my stang.
braupe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #5 (permalink)
braupe is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 521 Threads: 48
 braupe's Country Flag  View braupe's 20 photos  View braupe's HomePage
Arlington, Granbury   Texas
Send a message via Yahoo to braupe
Default

I looked up the stats of a 2006 350Z

hp=300@6400
tq=260@4800
Weight=3400

2001 Gt

hp=260@5250
tq=302@4000
weight=3417

They are close in numbers, but if they have better gearing, and can launch and stay in their powerband then they got me. I'll try to race one at the track. Then I'll try again with better gearing.
__________________
2001 Mustang GT-"GONE"
Bassani x-pipe Catted, Flowmasters, CAI, March UDPs, Steeda Tri-ax, Functional Hood scoop, Matrix lowering springs, Steeda C/C plates, Roush LCA, Alpine-9885 Head Unit.

2003 F150 Sport 4X4 4.6-SOLD
1999 F150 Xlt Flaresode 4.6-SOLD

2000 VW Jetta GLX VR6- God I miss my stang.
braupe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #6 (permalink)
nghtrnnr is offline Senior Member

S197 Member


Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,996 Threads: 233
 nghtrnnr's Country Flag  View nghtrnnr's 5 photos
Brooklyn   New York
Default

the 350z...i'll stop short of calling that car a joke but i would be absolutely shocked if you couldnt beat it...stock to stock i have beaten them each and every time...they have never been a concern of mine....dont get them confused with the g35 though...the g35 is a bit harder...that one might give ya a headache but the 350 is firmly etched onto my list of cars to look for after a viper smokes me...


oops...i didnt read deep enough...i thought you had the s197 gt...uh...okay they might hurt ya a lil in a 2001 gt....get the gears bro...i'm a huge huge fan of gears...best bang for buck and the one mod short of the heavy stuff that you'll feel as you drive it from the mechanic
nghtrnnr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #7 (permalink)
meangreen92 is offline Top Dog

5.0L Member


Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,021 Threads: 111
 meangreen92's Country Flag  View meangreen92's 14 photos
Southern   Ohio
Default

From a dig, you should be able to stay ahead for a while, but at some point, (75-80 MPH?) it may creep past you. Those cars get the job done at higher speeds.
But in a first and second gear pull, the Mustang is king. I beat one up an on ramp one time, and I ain't got no 260 horsepower.
I think they have a special edition that's faster than the rest, but there prolly aren't alot of them out there.
__________________
1992 Deep Emerald Green Mustang GT Hatch, 5 speed, 2.73s, Mac fenderwell cold air intake, '93 Cobra MAF, Mac 70mm throttle body & spacer, Explorer intakes, Mac unequal headers & offroad pipe, Magnaflow catback, Walbro 110lph fuel pump, Jet adjustable FPR, MSD Blaster coil, Accel 8mm wires, FRPP aluminum quadrant, UPR firewall adjuster, stock cable, Granatelli upper control arms.
Waiting to go on: Granatelli lower control arms, and GT40 Iron heads!
meangreen92 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #8 (permalink)
BlueStreak03 is offline Top Dog


Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 11,054 Threads: 392
 BlueStreak03's Country Flag  View BlueStreak03's 78 photos  View BlueStreak03's 5 products for your review
Trinity   North Carolina
Send a message via AIM to BlueStreak03 Send a message via Yahoo to BlueStreak03
Default

I'll take the torque over the HP any day. 99+ GT's have beaten 350's pretty regular from what I've seen.
__________________
Sometimes I think that government fits that old-fashioned definition of a baby: An alimentary canal with an appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other.
- Ronald Reagan

Stangless...for now
BlueStreak03 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #9 (permalink)
Kyle F is offline Top Dog

5.0L Member
S197 Member


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,367 Threads: 231
 Kyle F's Country Flag  View Kyle F's 63 photos  View Kyle F's 1 classified ad  View Kyle F's HomePage
Knoxville   Tennessee
Send a message via AIM to Kyle F Send a message via Yahoo to Kyle F
Default

I Think getting one from a dig will yield you the best results because of the Torque advantage, but as said above they need to be revved to get the power out of them.

I drove one and it was quick. I also have beaten one with a LT1 Z-28, but I had a 6-speed as well and it had a 3.42 gear, but I got him on a Roll at 50mph. I left him at 120 when I shifted to 5th and I still had the Torque to pull. Mods on the LT1 at the Time were a Moroso CAI, Flomaster Cat-back, and 93 Octane Tune. It was nose to nose up until I grabed 5th and I was slowly pulling away and my LT1 was in Prime running condition so maybe that would help you to gage what your results would be.

Personally with numbers that close tis really a drivers race. Just stay away from the twisties.
__________________
2006 Mustang GT in Torch Red
C&L Intake, Evolution Performance Tune, Borla Axle Backs, Hurst Shifter, 4.10's, JBA Long Tubes, Prothane Engine Mounts, Steeda UDPs, FRPP Charge Motion Delete Plates

84 Bronco, 302 C6 on 32 10.50's
Kyle F is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #10 (permalink)
Dave Mustang is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 671 Threads: 25
 Dave Mustang's Country Flag  View Dave Mustang's 1 photo  View Dave Mustang's HomePage
602   Arizona
Send a message via AIM to Dave Mustang
Default

300hp 350z = Pretty quick if they rev the snot out of the engine
287hp 350z = Slower than an rx-8... I've smoked a few of these clowns
__________________
1996 Mustang GT 248A
barely any mods, Daily driver
1965 Chevy c-10
350 chevy getting pulled for 402BBC and Th400
1984 Caprice Classic

305 getting pulled for mild 350, hoping for high 14s
Dave Mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #11 (permalink)
tripleblack is offline Forums Moderator

4.6L Member


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 14,673 Threads: 693
 tripleblack's Country Flag  View tripleblack's 48 photos
Atlanta   Georgia
Default Power/weight ratio

Quote:
Originally Posted by braupe View Post
I keep seeing 350Z's around town and I want to race one pretty bad, but don't know if I cold take one. I know I could hang with one, especially reading the stats from an old motor trend I have. Supposedly I am just a pinch faster in stock trim. Anywho just looking for some input.
Lets see what the specs say...

Your GT coupe weighs 3347#, while his Z weights a lot more at 3815#. Definite edge to the stang.

His standard hp output is 287hp, and with your mods, you are making about the same. Call it even on hp.

His torque output is 274#, while yours is somewhere around 320#. Another definite edge to the stang, particularly with your lighter weight.

All things being equal, I'd say that even a stone stock GT with just 260hp would still have a better power/weight ratio, and a lot more torque.

Close race, but the edge in a drag race would go to the car with the lighter weight and the torque.
__________________
tripleblack

"You can never be free until you let yourself go."
tripleblack is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #12 (permalink)
reivaxtorres is offline Senior Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,275 Threads: 64
 reivaxtorres's Country Flag  View reivaxtorres's 146 photos
Ontario   California
Send a message via AIM to reivaxtorres Send a message via Yahoo to reivaxtorres
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tripleblack View Post
Lets see what the specs say...

Your GT coupe weighs 3347#, while his Z weights a lot more at 3815#. Definite edge to the stang.

His standard hp output is 287hp, and with your mods, you are making about the same. Call it even on hp.

His torque output is 274#, while yours is somewhere around 320#. Another definite edge to the stang, particularly with your lighter weight.

All things being equal, I'd say that even a stone stock GT with just 260hp would still have a better power/weight ratio, and a lot more torque.

Close race, but the edge in a drag race would go to the car with the lighter weight and the torque.
tripleblack, where did you get the info on the z? from everything ive seen, coupe vs coupe, the z is lighter than the stang by around 100-200lbs.

there was a post earlier about there being a "special edition" z, and its true, but it was only out for 05, it was the 35th anniversary Z.
03-05 Z made 287hp and 274tq and rev to 6k
05 anniversary Z,and all 06+ Zs made 300hp and 268tq, and rev up to 7k

my car has 218rwhp (modded 98gt, stock intake/exhaust manifolds, cams, heads), and my friends 05 Anniversary Z made 238rwhp bone stock, didnt even have an intake kit or filter.
my car made 284rwtq, his made 218rwtq. at the 1/8mile, his car came it at 9.4-5, mine came in at 9.2-3 on average, and i always beat him out of the hole until i shifted into 3rd, tahts where he started catching up. on the freeways from around a 60mph roll, its not until i hit 4th gear that he starts to pass me, in the mean time i am neck-to-neck with him.
stock vs stock, the 01 GT (5spd) should be able to beat him, but barely. but then again, who keeps mustangs un-modded for long? as for the Z, more than likely it will be stock seeing as to how its $$ to mod it ($1k+ for a catback...)
__________________
RIP Gloria A. Torres
4/26/61 - 10/30/07
The best Mom-lady I could have ever asked for

Last edited by reivaxtorres; 02-12-2007 at 01:30 PM. Reason: typo, lol
reivaxtorres is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #13 (permalink)
tripleblack is offline Forums Moderator

4.6L Member


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 14,673 Threads: 693
 tripleblack's Country Flag  View tripleblack's 48 photos
Atlanta   Georgia
Default Specs

I got the specs from:

http://www.edmunds.com/used/2004/nis...484/specs.html

Gross weight on the Z is listed as 3815# (this is the weight of the standard coupe - the "enthusiast" coupe runs about a hundred pounds more with bigger brakes, suspension, etc.) I just noticed that there was no gross weight listed for the Mustang, (they are placed in the same slot on the page, so I grabbed the wrong one) so that's part of the problem. So if just the curb weight is used, the Z is 3188.

Which is indeed lighter than the 3347# mustang (159 pounds).

Sorry for the confusion - my mistake.

With the questioners' modifications, I still suspect it would be a horserace with a stock Z.

From the information on Edmunds, the Z's come in the following versions, plus 2 types of convertibles:

1. Standard
2. Enthusiast
3. Performance
4. Track

Edmunds agrees - as I posted above, the Z's power output is stock at 287 hp, and 274 ft# of torque.

The modifications the questioner listed would proabably add about 25 hp to the 260 his car had from the factory. He would also see some increase in his stock torque of 302 ft#. Finally, removing all those catalytic converters would save considerable weight as well.

I bet if your car was a 99 or later, you would give him a run for his money stock (he has to overcome that torque advantage off the line), though he would probably overhaul you down the stretch with that extra horsepower. The weight differential would make only a slight difference - perhaps a tenth of a second.


Quote:
Originally Posted by reivaxtorres View Post
tripleblack, where did you get the info on the z? from everything ive seen, coupe vs coupe, the z is lighter than the stang by around 100-200lbs.

there was a post earlier about there being a "special edition" z, and its true, but it was only out for 05, it was the 35th anniversary Z.
03-05 Z made 287hp and 274tq and rev to 6k
05 anniversary Z,and all 06+ Zs made 300hp and 268tq, and rev up to 7k

my car has 218rwhp (modded 98gt, stock intake/exhaust manifolds, cams, heads), and my friends 05 Anniversary Z made 238rwhp bone stock, didnt even have an intake kit or filter.
my car made 284rwtq, his made 218rwtq. at the 1/8mile, his car came it at 9.4-5, mine came in at 9.2-3 on average, and i always beat him out of the hole until i shifted into 3rd, tahts where he started catching up. on the freeways from around a 60mph roll, its not until i hit 4th gear that he starts to pass me, in the mean time i am neck-to-neck with him.
stock vs stock, the 01 GT (5spd) should be able to beat him, but barely. but then again, who keeps mustangs un-modded for long? as for the Z, more than likely it will be stock seeing as to how its $$ to mod it ($1k+ for a catback...)
__________________
tripleblack

"You can never be free until you let yourself go."
tripleblack is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #14 (permalink)
XR7GT is offline Apprentice


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 130 Threads: 3
 XR7GT's Country Flag
Gilroy   California
Default

I wasn't impressed with the 350z. My friend has one with exhaust and intake (no tune). My stang with intake and exhaust (no tune as well). My stang beat his car from dig till about 85. Up top, it creeps up very slowly. Againts my almost stock SRT-4 it didn't stand a chance up top. 350z has a good overall balance. However IMO you pay too much for that car with what you get.
XR7GT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #15 (permalink)
reivaxtorres is offline Senior Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,275 Threads: 64
 reivaxtorres's Country Flag  View reivaxtorres's 146 photos
Ontario   California
Send a message via AIM to reivaxtorres Send a message via Yahoo to reivaxtorres
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tripleblack View Post
I got the specs from:

2004 Nissan 350Z specs, auto safety at Edmunds

Gross weight on the Z is listed as 3815# (this is the weight of the standard coupe - the "enthusiast" coupe runs about a hundred pounds more with bigger brakes, suspension, etc.) I just noticed that there was no gross weight listed for the Mustang, (they are placed in the same slot on the page, so I grabbed the wrong one) so that's part of the problem. So if just the curb weight is used, the Z is 3188.

Which is indeed lighter than the 3347# mustang (159 pounds).

Sorry for the confusion - my mistake.

With the questioners' modifications, I still suspect it would be a horserace with a stock Z.

From the information on Edmunds, the Z's come in the following versions, plus 2 types of convertibles:

1. Standard
2. Enthusiast
3. Performance
4. Track

Edmunds agrees - as I posted above, the Z's power output is stock at 287 hp, and 274 ft# of torque.

The modifications the questioner listed would proabably add about 25 hp to the 260 his car had from the factory. He would also see some increase in his stock torque of 302 ft#. Finally, removing all those catalytic converters would save considerable weight as well.

I bet if your car was a 99 or later, you would give him a run for his money stock (he has to overcome that torque advantage off the line), though he would probably overhaul you down the stretch with that extra horsepower. The weight differential would make only a slight difference - perhaps a tenth of a second.
oh, i agree, with a 99+ car and the mods i have, i would have beat my friend.
and i didnt mean to sound rude or anything in my post above, i was just wondering if i had been misinfored and been giving out the wrong info.

tripleblack, i agree with edmunds also on the hp & tq numbers, but thats for the 03-05 versions only. the 06+ (and the 35th anniversary edition) Zs all came with a 300hp/260tq(i was wrong earlier, apparently its 260tq, not 268) engine, according to my friends window sticker/dealer info and Nissan 350Z Full Review.

with his mods, in the 1/4 mile, with his mods, i will be very surprised if a Z beats him.
__________________
RIP Gloria A. Torres
4/26/61 - 10/30/07
The best Mom-lady I could have ever asked for
reivaxtorres is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New to this forum, what do you think about 2001 Mustangs? MustangAnnies Introductions 90 06-06-2008 02:11 PM
my first 2001 mustang. braupe 4.6L Tech 6 01-16-2007 12:11 PM
2010 Mustang Information!!! kscoyote Mustang Lounge 25 09-17-2006 07:22 PM
Front Row Seat, Mustang kills Camaro Snake Pliskin Kill Stories 0 07-16-2006 09:48 AM
How hard woudl it be to add a new 2001 Mach 460 6 disc cd-player to a 1994 mustang GT ceaser Audio & Alarms 2 02-24-2004 06:34 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112