AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > 4.6 Mustang > 4.6L Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.

Reply
 
Old 06-03-2004   #1 (permalink)
ilblissli is offline Rookie


Joined: May 2004
Posts: 37 Threads: 5
 View ilblissli's HomePage
Send a message via AIM to ilblissli Send a message via MSN to ilblissli Send a message via Yahoo to ilblissli
Default The Cold Air Intake thread

I recently bought a 2001 GT and was wondering what the best CAI is. I have already looked at the tech articles and reviews (but they were all for the 5.0) and I searched the 4.6 tech forum but it yielded very little information on this subject.

So my question to you is. What intakes are available? What intake is the best? And Why? Is there anything else we should be concerned about when looking at when getting a CAI?


PS. Lets please not make this into a "you should get gears and under drive pulleys instead" discussion. Thanks in advance!
ilblissli is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #2 (permalink)
Kevin62773 is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 607 Threads: 93
 Kevin62773's Country Flag  View Kevin62773's HomePage
Maryland   Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin62773
Default

Well you should get the gears and pulleys for sure but you get them when you like. As for CAI go you can't go wrong with the K&N FIPK kit i' m Matt will chime in on this one to. There is also the densecharger kit. I think these kits are your best bet there are kits outher that look better but i think the FIPK is the way to go. Oh by the way the other day i had my hood up and my engine running and i had never done this before i pulled my throttle from under my hood i could not beleive how much the FIPK sucked in the air man the whole kit jumped and there was a big sucking sound it was kinded of cool there is no doubt it is way better then stock or even stock and just the drop in filter for that matter.
__________________
**No advertising in signatures, doing so will result in an infraction**
Kevin62773 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #3 (permalink)
98GTdrop-top is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 97 Threads: 11
 98GTdrop-top's Country Flag
Indianapolis   Indiana
Default

densecharger all the way baby...
They're all the same, and don't yeild much of a power increase. It was the first mod i did as well, though.
__________________
Rio Red 98 GT Convertible
Full Densecharger cold air intake
Steeda Intake spacer
Steeda underdrive pullies
Flowmaster cat-back
Dropzone sport springs (2'' drop on all four corners)
B&M Quick-Shift Electronic Shift Kit

In Summary, all of the cheapest performance mods I could find.
At least it looks and sounds fast...
98GTdrop-top is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #4 (permalink)
97GTstang is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 809 Threads: 28
 97GTstang's Country Flag
West Babylon   New York
Send a message via AIM to 97GTstang
Default

first mod i did too. I vote densecharger. (densecharger and k&n fipk were both rated #1 by mmff). They are the best b/c the both suck up colder air, and are both plastic not metal so they absorb less heat. IMO go with densecharger, they have good prices too. But you really cant go wrong with either. If you get one though dont waste your money on any other brand densecharger and k&N are the only two ones i would even consider.
__________________
1997 Mustang GT Pacific Green Auto... modified
97GTstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #5 (permalink)
ilblissli is offline Rookie


Joined: May 2004
Posts: 37 Threads: 5
 View ilblissli's HomePage
Send a message via AIM to ilblissli Send a message via MSN to ilblissli Send a message via Yahoo to ilblissli
Default

Does densecharger have an official website? How does the install of a dense charger compare to the k&n? From what I’ve read about densecharger, the filter is actually up in the fender somewhere. Do you have to cut a hole to get it there? Also if the filter is up in the fender wouldn't it get wet when driving in the rain having the wheel spin water onto it?
ilblissli is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #6 (permalink)
Kevin62773 is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 607 Threads: 93
 Kevin62773's Country Flag  View Kevin62773's HomePage
Maryland   Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin62773
Default

here we go hehe another CAI debate. Ok the FIPK is easier to install. The dencharger has a extra curved pipe into the fender some people argue you will get colder air this way there has been many test that have shown that the less bend in the tubes the better meaning that the air travels straiter the better it flows if you look at the FIPK design even at the top where it curves a little to go into the thottle body even then it's so slight. Either way they are both good kits i think the FIPK looks better then the densecharger if your looking for the easier instal go with nthe FIPK look at it like this maybe a little colder air from the fender wall and maybe don't matter anyway you might not really want that bend. You have to remember after market mods make claims to make sales thats for sure if you look at the desigh of the K&N kit it basic and it works no bends fat pipe and it's K&N every racing team uses there filters well most of them. Take your pic it's all what you like.
__________________
**No advertising in signatures, doing so will result in an infraction**
Kevin62773 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #7 (permalink)
97GTstang is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 809 Threads: 28
 97GTstang's Country Flag
West Babylon   New York
Send a message via AIM to 97GTstang
Default

densecharger is not a hard install. You definetly need a helper to do it though. Like stated earlier the densecharger does have more bends, but i believe the densecharger's throttle body pipe is wider than k&n's. K&N has the filter in the engine bay with not bends, and a smaller tb pipe, so theoretically it sucks up hotter air, but has a direct flow route. Densecharger on the other hand sucks cool air from the fender and gets a little turbulant due to the bends but then has a wide tb pipe. So both systems have there pro's and con's. Now as far as the filter getting wet in the fender. First off you do not need to drill a hole fore the pipe, the hole the down tube goes into is already in the side of your fender. You do need to drill holes to put the screws into but thats about it. Now when its in the fender you have a wheel well platic thing that separates the wheel well from the inside of the fender, so no the wheel does not spin water onto it. Finally, yes if you go through a very deep pudle the filter could theoretically suck up water, but the pudle would have to be half way up the fender, hopefully you wouldnt be driving through that anyway. I have had my densecharger on for a year driven in rain snow, everything never had any problems. After heavy rain driving going through pudle's etc... the filter is always dry, on rare occassions the filter will get a little wet (spray from the road) but it is not like soaked in water, so there is really no problems. You can check out densecharger at www.densecharger.com the owner is a guy names John Demolte he is a great guy to deal with. If you have any questions for him dont hesitate to ask he will be happy to help you.
__________________
1997 Mustang GT Pacific Green Auto... modified
97GTstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #8 (permalink)
propellerhead is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member


Joined: May 2004
Posts: 98 Threads: 4
 propellerhead's Country Flag  View propellerhead's HomePage
Foat Wurth   Texas
Default

So how do you replace the filter on the K&N FIPK? Do you pull it off right there in the box in the hood? Does the FIPK kit come with a K&N filter? Are there paper filters for the FIPK?

What about the Densecharger? Do you get on your back and reach up inside the fender?
__________________
2004 Mustang GT (1 of 8,000,000+)
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/593952
propellerhead is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #9 (permalink)
Kevin62773 is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 607 Threads: 93
 Kevin62773's Country Flag  View Kevin62773's HomePage
Maryland   Maryland
Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin62773
Default

Yes the FIPK comes with the filter and you can also buy the cleaning kit and the oil spray to clean it every few months for like 10 bucks. I can't beleive MANA has not yet chimed in on this to sell him on the FIPK.
__________________
**No advertising in signatures, doing so will result in an infraction**
Kevin62773 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #10 (permalink)
97GTstang is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 809 Threads: 28
 97GTstang's Country Flag
West Babylon   New York
Send a message via AIM to 97GTstang
Default

the denseharcer, similar install to the fipk, only difference in yes, you have to get on your back and put a pipe into the fender, and then attack the filter to it. It is really nothing to be afraid of, I installed mine with my useless g/f at the time, and she was able to do what i needed done to install it. It is not a hard install at all. But like i said before you cant go wrong either way, i may be pushing densehcarger but only b/c i have it and like it and am happy with it. K&N fipk is also very good, so it is really up to you, you will be happy either way. Also the densecharger comes with a k&n filter.
__________________
1997 Mustang GT Pacific Green Auto... modified
97GTstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2004   #11 (permalink)
ilblissli is offline Rookie


Joined: May 2004
Posts: 37 Threads: 5
 View ilblissli's HomePage
Send a message via AIM to ilblissli Send a message via MSN to ilblissli Send a message via Yahoo to ilblissli
Default

The dense charger seems to be quite a bit cheaper than the FIPK. Is that just because we are paying for k&n's name?
ilblissli is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004   #12 (permalink)
97GTstang is offline Made Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 809 Threads: 28
 97GTstang's Country Flag
West Babylon   New York
Send a message via AIM to 97GTstang
Default

i am sure that is part of the reason. Although K&N lets densecharger include it's filters and use it's name with there kit too, and it is still cheaper so i dunno.

**EDIT**
just found this while looking for something else, take a look

http://www.stangnet.com/tech/lee50guru/dense_tech.html
__________________
1997 Mustang GT Pacific Green Auto... modified
97GTstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004   #13 (permalink)
Mana4Real is offline Top Dog

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,153 Threads: 258
 Mana4Real's Country Flag  View Mana4Real's HomePage
San Ramon   California
Send a message via AIM to Mana4Real Send a message via Yahoo to Mana4Real
Default

I'm just getting tired of the same questions being asked over and over again. Plus the fact that I've been really busy lately makes it really hard for me to get to everysingle post. I say get the K&N FIPK all the way. Had one and it made a huge SOTP feeling. I also noticed a difference in throttle response immidiately. Everyone that I've recommended a FIPK to has loved it. I haven't had a single person unhappy with it. I sell these kits everyday at work. It's up to you. I'm not in the mood to argue with it about anyone. I've had a bad week. But the FIPK comes highly recommended by me.
__________________
-Matt
Mana4Real is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004   #14 (permalink)
Mana4Real is offline Top Dog

4.6L Member


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,153 Threads: 258
 Mana4Real's Country Flag  View Mana4Real's HomePage
San Ramon   California
Send a message via AIM to Mana4Real Send a message via Yahoo to Mana4Real
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 97GTstang
densecharger and k&n fipk were both rated #1 by mmff. They are the best b/c the both suck up colder air, and are both plastic not metal so they absorb less heat. IMO go with densecharger, they have good prices too. But you really cant go wrong with either. If you get one though dont waste your money on any other brand densecharger and k&N are the only two ones i would even consider.
I'm totally with you. But I vote FIPK because it's smog legal.

Somewhere down the line you said DC is 100mm, I believe the FIPK is like 3.5" which is somewhere around 88mm... Bigger isn't always better. You can lose velocity with too big of a tube.

FIPK comes with a cleaning kit, you don't have to buy it.

I thought I replied to this thread anyways... Guess I didn't
__________________
-Matt
Mana4Real is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004   #15 (permalink)
ilblissli is offline Rookie


Joined: May 2004
Posts: 37 Threads: 5
 View ilblissli's HomePage
Send a message via AIM to ilblissli Send a message via MSN to ilblissli Send a message via Yahoo to ilblissli
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mana4Real
I'm just getting tired of the same questions being asked over and over again.
I apologize. As I said, I did read through the product reviews section first and also did a search, but didn't get the information I was looking for.

Perhaps we can make this a sticky, or include this thread in some sort of FAQ?
ilblissli is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cold Air Intake question GTRmustang95 4.6L Tech 15 01-11-2009 09:50 PM
Cold Air Intake vs Stock Airbox leftystang89 5.0L Tech 22 04-26-2008 07:38 PM
cold air intake javi 2005+ Mustang GT Tech 24 04-15-2008 05:42 PM
C & L's new cold air intake kit stylnTang 2005+ Mustang GT Tech 26 04-27-2006 11:19 PM
Ever heard of this cold air intake GTRmustang95 4.6L Tech 9 04-21-2005 08:47 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110