302 vs. 351 comparisons - Ford Mustang Forum
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-14-2009 Thread Starter
beretboy2003's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: southwest
Posts: 3
302 vs. 351 comparisons

Hey guys i'm looking to take a foxbody and turn it into my road racing project. I seems that most have the 302 in them but some have the 351. Is there that big of a difference? My goal is to have around 350-400 rwhp but i also want the most reliability and the one that the most aftermarket parts are avaliable for. Also what's the difference in a 5.0 H.O? Suggestions?
beretboy2003 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-14-2009
PONY Member
Old man's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Macon
Posts: 617
If they have a 351 it is because someone put one there. My favorite budget engine is a 351W. They are very robust reliable engines and MOST 302 parts fit except components related to balance and deck height.

The 302 HO motor came in many forms, from flat tappet cam versions to hydraulic roller cam versions. Peak power was in the 220 HP range mostly due to small heads with limited flow.

Mostly because of the taller deck and beefier crank and rods, the 351W is a little heavier than a 302. The taller deck cuts down on rod angle and allows use of a longer rod, and truck engines use better bolts and machining on rod end caps to make a stronger rod. I've run truck rods at 7000-7500 RPM without a single case of failure in years of drag racing.

You'll want aftermarket heads for any Ford motor. Heads range from the poorest flowing E7TE castings at about 165 cfm through D0OE 351 castings at 189 cfm up to 250 cfm with good aluminum heads like the TFS or AFR heads.

The ultimate head by far is a "Yates" SB head at 368 cfm. A 330 inch motor of mine made well over 700 HP naturally aspirated with them with a very wide power band using a single 4 bbl carb.

Old man is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-14-2009
cindys_sn95's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Gulfport
Posts: 7,171
easier and cheaper to get 400 hp with 351w!
cindys_sn95 is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-14-2009
Made Member
5.0L Member
347Vert's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Benton Harbor
Posts: 327
IMHO - If you looking at going through the curves stay with the 302.

Hundred pounds lighter on the nose resulting in better front/back weight distribution compared to the 351. Given the products out there you will not have a problem coaxing out 350-400rwhp, especially if you decide to stroke it. If you do stroke it, then go with the 331 stroker for the better rod ratio and to meet your longevity criteria. Further, the 302 reciprocating assembly is lighter and journals smaller (less friction) for quicker revs coming out of the corners.

Last, have fun with your project!

Have you truly entered Jesus ONE "Kingdom of GOD" or the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church through "water (baptism) and Spirit (Laying of Hands)" John 3:5 ??? Jesus fulfills Ezekiel 36:25-27 prophesy. You see entering the Early Church in this same pattern in Acts 2:38 and specifically explained in Acts 8:14-17 and Acts 19:5-6. Enter His ONE "Kingdom of GOD" to receive Jesus as the "Lamb of GOD" (John 1:29, 1 Corinthians 5:7, 1 Peter 1:19) for ETERNAL LIFE John 6:54.
347Vert is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-14-2009
Mbuehler86's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville
Posts: 42
i have a 351w in my mustang with cast iron GT-40 heads and it still only weighs 2750lbs., i'd go with the 351w for sure, they produce way more torque and horsepower and with the longer stroke you can get over 11:1 compression with flat tops, i noticed a huge difference when i swaped mine out for a 351w the torque is crazy
Mbuehler86 is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-14-2009
YerDugliness's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: near Houston, TX
Posts: 43
If you can afford it, why not go with a 351 alloy block/heads? You'd get close to the weight of a 302 iron engine and enjoy the better power range of the 351. There is no replacement for displacement (not mine, wish I knew who said it first ).

YerDugliness is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 04-14-2009
SHELBY GT 350 Member
302Feen's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Norman
Posts: 4,008
My vote is for the 351!
IMO, the thing that gives the 351 the advantage is the 302 can only be poked and stroked to a 347 whereas a 351 can be pushed to even a 427! We all have to admit it, it doesn't matter whether you have 100HP or 400HP, we all eventually want to go even faster!

-1994 Mustang GT "The Red Baron": 3.73 gears,K&N filter,GT40 tubular intake,BBK Full Length Headers,modified midpipe & Flowmaster muffs, timing at 12*. Best time- 14.74 @ 93.16
-Check profile for pics of our car collection!
- AmericanMuscle ROCKS!!
- "True Hot-Rods don't have valve covers!"
302Feen is offline  
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome