1989 LX 5.0 vs GT - Ford Mustang Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old 04-08-2012 Thread Starter
PONY Member
4.6L Member
 
RidinHigh's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Westchester
Posts: 852
 
1989 LX 5.0 vs GT

What's the difference between a 1989 mustang LX 5.0 and a GT?

Spec wise specifically...
-HP, Tourque, weight, stuff like that & if faced with a choice, which would you choose?

Or am I totally bugging and they're the same thing

Thanks guys!!

1994 Mustang GT Project SOLD

2001 Bullitt Mustang GT 5 speed #4372 SOLD (But bought back!)

1989 Manual Mustang Lx 5.0 5 speed SOLD

2003 Automatic V6 Mustang SOLD
RidinHigh is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old 04-08-2012
Rookie
 
meanredstang's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: laurel
Posts: 6
 
I have a 92 gt and love it, I believe the lx is the base model with the v8 swapped for the 4 cyl as far as power I believe the we're the same
meanredstang is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old 04-08-2012
GT Member
5.0L Member
 
stangdawg's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,899
 
The LX notch has less weight (100-200 pounds maybe) as the hatch lid is heavy as sh|t. GT has more ground effects. Also the LX exhaust has straight exit tailpipes which are a bit more showy whereas the GTs are mostly hidden turndowns.

Same motor and power numbers.

1989 GT - Show Car Project
Mods: AFR165 - Comp XE264-12 cam, WC T5Z, Tmoss Cobra Intake, full bolt-ons, 305 rwhp / 345 rwtq
stangdawg is offline  
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old 04-08-2012 Thread Starter
PONY Member
4.6L Member
 
RidinHigh's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Westchester
Posts: 852
 
Thanks guys, I'm about to get a 1989 LX this week so I think I'll just buy the gt front bumper for the fogs

1994 Mustang GT Project SOLD

2001 Bullitt Mustang GT 5 speed #4372 SOLD (But bought back!)

1989 Manual Mustang Lx 5.0 5 speed SOLD

2003 Automatic V6 Mustang SOLD
RidinHigh is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old 04-13-2012
Apprentice
 
wisenthefools's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Location: Queen Creek
Posts: 51
 
Main difference is weight. Gt is around 100lbs. heavier with the body kit and mainly the front bumper brace to support the fogs. Also different interior options in the GT. If you plan on making that LX a GT clone, you'll need to do more than simply slap the GT bumper cover on. You'll need the front bumper brace and the moldings around the whole car are different as well.

IMO, body kits are for fuckin imports, keep em off american muscle. The LX has a much cleaner look and when given the right stance, just looks bad ass all around.

1989 Mustang lx 5.0: MAC long tubes wrapped, BBK catless H-pipe, Magnaflows dumped w/ turndowns, BBK blackout fenderwell CAI, Polished GT40 intake, Steeda tri-ax shifter, 3G swap, Mark VIII fan, UPR clutch cable-quadrant w/ firewall adjuster, 3.73's, Walbro 255, ARP bolts, black 16" pony wheels, Nitto drag radials.
wisenthefools is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old 04-13-2012
SHELBY GT 350 Member
5.0L Member
 
YLDPONY's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Thornville
Posts: 8,798
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by wisenthefools View Post
IMO, body kits are for fuckin imports, keep em off american muscle. The LX has a much cleaner look and when given the right stance, just looks bad ass all around.
Many a true word sir, many people prefer the looks of an LX. No offense to GT owners, there are some great looking GTs out there. But, if it was born an LX, leave it an LX :yelpleased:

'94 Laser red 'vert. Still a 5-oh... for now
YLDPONY is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old 04-13-2012 Thread Starter
PONY Member
4.6L Member
 
RidinHigh's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Location: Westchester
Posts: 852
 
I was personally thinking about doing the bumper for the fog lights so I could see better, but I didn't know you had to get all the other stuff. Thanks for your input guys

1994 Mustang GT Project SOLD

2001 Bullitt Mustang GT 5 speed #4372 SOLD (But bought back!)

1989 Manual Mustang Lx 5.0 5 speed SOLD

2003 Automatic V6 Mustang SOLD
RidinHigh is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old 04-13-2012
SHELBY GT 350 Member
5.0L Member
 
YLDPONY's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Thornville
Posts: 8,798
 
Factory "fog lights" are decorations, not really functional. There are better and easier ways to see much better.

'94 Laser red 'vert. Still a 5-oh... for now
YLDPONY is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old 04-13-2012
Rookie
5.0L Member
 
nitrousfed89's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: hondo
Posts: 21
 
The lx comes in notch and hatch back. The gt ground effects and all brackets weigh about 100 pounds and the hatch weighs about 80 pounds not counting the extra metal and bracing to support the heavy hatch when open. I personally think the lx notch back is a cleaner looking car. If u line up stock lx notch and a gt the notch is quicker. 100 lbs = .1 sec at the track hope I helped
nitrousfed89 is offline  
Apprentice
5.0L Member
 
88Foxer's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Brighton
Posts: 88
 
I agree with YLDPONY the fog lights are just decorations I have a 88 GT and even with fog lights that are new I feel they are garbage. I also think the LX has a clean look to them and in my opinion as well you should leave it. Don't get me wrong I do like my GT got a great deal on it but I have seen some really tough looking LX cars. Could have save money with an LX in a resto as well since I replaced most of the moldings/ground effects on my car.
88Foxer is offline  
GT Member
5.0L Member
 
stangdawg's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,899
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHigh View Post
I was personally thinking about doing the bumper for the fog lights so I could see better, but I didn't know you had to get all the other stuff. Thanks for your input guys
And the moldings and fender extensions for the GT are very pricy. One door molding is $75 as an example.

I'd also recommend leaving it as is.

1989 GT - Show Car Project
Mods: AFR165 - Comp XE264-12 cam, WC T5Z, Tmoss Cobra Intake, full bolt-ons, 305 rwhp / 345 rwtq
stangdawg is offline  
Rookie
5.0L Member
 
SEXY_FLAT_BLACK's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: Kirklan
Posts: 5
 
I have a GT and i think they look nicer then the lx but that why they mad the two. And for the 100lb you can always lose wait on your car. For the fog light you can not really tell when they are on or off so that would be kind of a wast of money. But thats just me 2 cents. Have fun eather way with the car

"If you are not first your last"
88 Ford GT Mustang 5.0
05 Jeep Grand cherokee 4.7L
SEXY_FLAT_BLACK is offline  
BOSS Member
5.0L Member
 
ALMOST STK's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Prunedale
Posts: 3,979
 
The factory data supplied by Ford themselves to the Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association and published along with every other specification for the car you can think of.

Their definition of curb weight is full of fluids, ready to drive, but without cargo or passengers. The consensus seems to be although most GT's came with A/C because the people paying for the GT package tended to want more heavily optioned cars, they could be ordered without it. Maybe it was standard but could be deleted. Otherwise the only thing the GT package really got you over a 5.0 hatchback was the body cladding, the seats, the foglights, and the 2-tone paint availability, and maybe "convenience group" interior lighting.

LX coupe 5-speed 3010
LX Hatch 5-speed 3069
GT Hatch 5-speed 3144
LX Convertible 5-speed 3231
GT convertible 5-speed 3365

LX coupe AOD 3076
LX Hatch AOD 3135
GT Hatch AOD 3210
LX convertible AOD 3297
GT convertible AOD 3431

These are the base weights for each model. Add to them the following options weights accordingly:

A/C 40
Power Locks 6
Power Window 6
AM/FM Cassette 2
Premium Sound 5
Radio Delete -9




That's EPA mileage. Derived from a government-mandated test cycle; not Ford.

"Curb Weight" is specified according to SAE standard J1100 "total weight of vehicle including batteries, lubricants, and other expendable supplies but
excluding the driver, passengers, and other payloads"
ALMOST STK is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183