AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustang > 5.0L Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions | Mustang Lounge | 5.0 Talk | 5.0 Tech | 94-95 Tech | Mustang Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 07-17-2008   #1 (permalink)
FordGuy1971 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 20 Threads: 6
 FordGuy1971's Country Flag  View FordGuy1971's 10 photos
Byers   Colorado
Default 1984 Mustang Small block is it HO or Standard?

I have a 1984 small block from a Mustang installed in my 1971 Mustang Grande. I have installed an Edelbrock performer intake and carburetor. I know that the distributor and waterpump are form the orginal 1971 block. I would like to replace the harmonic balancer that is currently installed. No timing marks etc and looks over all worn out. I was looking at two different TCI offerings from the Elastomer Balancer seriers for the Ford Small Block, external balance eaither the 28oz or the 50oz. After readling I found that the 50oz is for HO 302's. So how do I tell if I have a HO 302 that would require the 50oz?


FordGuy1971 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008   #2 (permalink)
5.0ForLife is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 420 Threads: 27
 5.0ForLife's Country Flag
Yorkton   Saskatchewan
Default

If your engine is For sure from an 84 Mustang, then yes it is a H.O. engine. 82 was the first year for the H.O.
__________________
Currently sans Mustang


Gone but not forgotten: '83 Charcoal GT 5 spd,
'89 Black/Titanium GT 5 spd, '90 Black LX Hatch 5 spd, ...
5.0ForLife is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008   #3 (permalink)
347HO is offline Apprentice


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 175 Threads: 0
 347HO's Country Flag
Seattle   Washington
Default

when you installed the intake, did it have the spider assembly holding the lifters straight in their bores?
You can also check the the size of the existing damper weight. If it's huge, that would be the 50oz.
347HO is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008   #4 (permalink)
5SpeedGT is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 507 Threads: 1
 5SpeedGT's Country Flag
Petrolia   Ontario
Default

Not all HO engines are rollers, so checking for the spider assembly is not an accurate way to tell.

5.0forlife is correct, HO 302's were first used in '82. From '82 to the '85 CFI cars, they were all flat tappet cams. The '85 4V was the first to get a roller cam. Starting in '86, Ford went to roller blocks across the board. Non-HO's even got the roller cam. Truck engines stayed flat tapett though.

If the engine (HO or not) is '82 or newer, it is a 50oz balance. (351W's stayed 28oz until the end of production)
5SpeedGT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008   #5 (permalink)
EagleAutosports is offline Forums Moderator

4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 34,753 Threads: 148
 EagleAutosports's Country Flag  View EagleAutosports's 546 photos  View EagleAutosports's 3 classified ads  View EagleAutosports's 1 products for your review  View EagleAutosports's HomePage
Graham   North Carolina
Send a message via MSN to EagleAutosports Send a message via Yahoo to EagleAutosports
Default

1984 engines, even the H.O. version, used flat tappet cams so it won't have the retainer spider. Since it's an 84 engine, it's a 50 ounce balance.
__________________
MOOG Certified Tech.
For mods and sound clips, see profile and gallery.

Ask me why I ran "only" a 13.54.

Member: NMRA
Member:
White Mustang Registry #362
Member: Fuzzy Dicer
EagleAutosports is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008   #6 (permalink)
FordGuy1971 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 20 Threads: 6
 FordGuy1971's Country Flag  View FordGuy1971's 10 photos
Byers   Colorado
Default

Thanks everyone. I have ordered aTCI® Elastomer Balancer 50oz and also a TCI Timing Pointer. Should have it next week. I will let eveyone know how it goes.
FordGuy1971 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1984, 302, harmonic balancer, small block



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2007 Mustang... Will a CAI void my warranty? blackbeast07 2005+ Mustang V6 Tech 14 04-08-2009 02:25 PM
2007 Mustang GT... Painted my factory wheels black jmanpatsfan Wheels and Tires 52 02-04-2009 04:25 PM
2006 Mustang GT... Do I need to upgrade valve springs with a competition stage 2 cam? silverstang01 2005+ Mustang GT Tech 43 07-16-2008 02:10 PM
2006 Mustang GT... What's a good suspension setup?? Tommy Stang 2005+ Mustang GT Tech 9 10-16-2007 05:56 PM
Ordered 4.10s for my 2000 Mustang GT... A few questions about install dawrr 4.6L Tech 16 10-07-2007 05:55 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110