Cold Air Intake vs Stock Airbox - Ford Mustang Forum
Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 23 (permalink) Old 04-23-2002 Thread Starter
leftystang89's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh/PA
Posts: 34
cold air intake vs airbox

I read somewhere online that if you take the airbox out to put a cold air induction in that you reduce air flow and lose horsepower....the article said that if you just remove the silencer and add a K&N filter you have more airflow and just as much horsepower if not more than the cold air induction. Anybody care to verify this info...or is it just B.S.
leftystang89 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 23 (permalink) Old 04-23-2002
GT Member
5.0L Member
spyder's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,049
Send a message via AIM to spyder
well the stock airbox on my 94 gt is already in the fenderwell, i dont see how the "cold air kit" will really help. and i read somewhere that in reality it only adds 2 horsepower , on a good day. if u take the stock airbox with k&n filter vs cold air with k&n , you will not notice any difference. i'd recomend just the filter. just my two cents.


DEAD: 1994 GT (a pine tree fell on it during a windstorm...great huh)

NEW: 1995 GT Convertible, Triple Black; receiving all the goodies from the 1994 gt and some more stuff too
spyder is offline  
post #3 of 23 (permalink) Old 04-23-2002
MACH I Member
5.0L Member
Vortex's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Ocala
Posts: 2,692
Send a message via AIM to Vortex
I dont really see how that report started... Usually the CAI kits are a tube thats bigger than the factory one. Plus you usually have less restrictive bends. There is always the fact that engines run better with colder air, even if cold doesnt boost HP, hot air loses HP. so you're gaining back what you should have to begin with.
This is true Unless, you use one of those flex tubes that are half the size. Ive never seen anything good come from them..
Just my opinion.
Vortex is offline  
post #4 of 23 (permalink) Old 04-23-2002
PONY Member
5.0L Member
EricD's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 343
Send a message via AIM to EricD
The air box does a good job of getting the air in and with a K&N there in not much else you can do there to make alot of horse power with the intake tub. Unless you drill and tap it for a dry NOS system. HAHAHA I agree with Vortex on this one the less restrictive tub with it's bigger diameter will get you something but not alot. Cold air is better than hot air. We all learned that in 1st grade. Run a snorkel on it in fall. The ones the guys run on there off road trucks that cross rivers. j/k:p

88 GT 5.0
Cold air inductin
Factory 5 upper and lower control arms
FMS 3.55 Motorsport H.D clutch
a/c dalete under drive pullies

88 GT NA 306, AFR 165s FTI cam, no numbers yet

Last edited by EricD; 04-23-2002 at 11:23 PM.
EricD is offline  
post #5 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-22-2002
Twister's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,479
I was talking to a K&N rep at the 1998 SEMA show....he told me that the reason why they did not have a cold air kit for a FOX body at the time was that they did not see anything better than the normal mod of removing the scilencer and putting in a panel filter....
Twister is offline  
post #6 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-22-2002
stangman1's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 37
the stock air box sucks in the hot air from the engine bay.
stangman1 is offline  
post #7 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-22-2002
Twister's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,479
Stangman, look at a is sealed off from the engine bay
Twister is offline  
post #8 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-30-2002
PONY Member
marks86gt's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Fairfield
Posts: 580
The only way to get any power gains is to upgrade the entire system from filter to lower intake. The answer to going from engine bay to fenderwell is simple. If your race, keep the filter in the engine bay, if you drive in traffic put it in the fenderwell. Look at it this way, a racer will not build up much heat under the hood. The air will also have the shortest travel with an underhood. A large portion of the time the car will wait to be staged while turned off. A cooler engine will also make more power. Versus the driver on the street who constantly sits at traffic lights, building up heat under the hood. The only air flow provided by a slow turning fan. Getting cool air from the fenderwell is the only choice for a street driver.

My 2 cents

Sold'86 GT Jalapeno Red 'vert, 200,000 miles Lots of Mods!!!!

2006 Mustang GT
C&L Racer, Eibach, SCT, CHE, CMCV Deletes, PRP, 4:10s on the way.

New toy:
1989 Mustang 2.3L Auto. 5.0 waiting in the garage...
marks86gt is offline  
post #9 of 23 (permalink) Old 09-09-2003
5.0L Member
kchronister's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 49
Well I can speak to this re: my 95GT.

First went from stock to a K&N replacement and the silencer removed. Drove that for a year, then went to a CAI w/fenderwell intake.

I didn't note much difference with the K&N replacing the stock cone filter. I did notice with both stock and the K&N filter that the car lost "oomph" after it was running for a bit -- presumably due to the engine compartment getting hotted up (esp since it took longer to get the effect the colder the weather was)

However, i've noticed a distinct difference moving from K&N stock replacement to the CAI. I think there's a flat out difference -- the car simply has more go to it. But I will certify there is a definitive difference in terms of not having the "it's hot now" dropoff in power any longer. So my experience would be the complete opposite of what leftystang heard.

YMMV, of course.

95 GT Convertible
Last of the 5.0's...
Stock -- for now.
kchronister is offline  
PONY Member
5.0L Member
95mustanglover's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Wilmington
Posts: 287
Send a message via AIM to 95mustanglover
Same Hear Started With Cone K&n Then Performance K&N Now CAI With Performance K&n In The Fender The Best Is CAI Thats All There Is To It Its Better For Ur Engine And Better For U

1995 Mustang GT 5.0 HO
Mods: March Under Drive Pulleys, BBK CAI, MAC Full Length Headers & Hi-Flow H-Pipe With Cats, Flow Master 2 Chambers, BBK Caster/Camber Plates, Ebiach Sportline Springs , KYB Gas Adjust Shocks & struts, K&N Filter Charger, 180 degree thermostat, 3:73 FMS, Catapult Trailing Arms, BBK 255Lbph And Adjustable Regulator, Gripp Subframes, Cobra RR Hood, Red Top Battery, Pro 5.0 Shifter, Zex 75 Shot System, 1/4 Inch Wheel Spacers Rear, M&M 6 Point Cage
Plans Stroke It And
95mustanglover is offline  
5.0L Member
Marco's Avatar
Joined: May 2003
Location: Edmond
Posts: 96
I have the Ram air kit from Kenne Bell and I took it to the track and never saw a difference. I took the kit off and is only running th eopen filter under the hood

1994 GT (Cobra Clone) Yellow
Lowered, pullies, exhaust,

1993 Mustang GT ( Blk on Blk) 84K RIP

1993 Ford Lightning ( Black) 201K
All Original with Gen II rims
Body Work is under construction now
Marco is offline  
teh n00b's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2
On a 90 GT is the silencer inside the fender?
teh n00b is offline  
Twister's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,479
Originally posted by teh n00b
On a 90 GT is the silencer inside the fender?
Twister is offline  
S197 Member
jjgt06's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Mosinee
Posts: 55
i get a kick out of these companys saying put our cai on and gain 15 to 20 hp. if you want 15 more hp out of a cai,you have to have your motor running at 6000 rpm to get this, who gos around at 6 grand all the time? you only gain a deeper sucking sound out of cai,s if you like that sound, more power to you,each to your own!!jj
jjgt06 is offline  
5.0L Member
89GTVert's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Bellingham
Posts: 165
I dont see how a "cold air" intake gets air thats any colder than the stock airbox because the source is the same. I would venture a guess that the only real advantage to a CAI is the tubing. If there is any gain from a CAI it would probably just be the tubing, thats why I am going to replace my stock tube with an aluminum one and keep my K&N panel filter.

89' GT Ragtop.
Ford Racing "C" springs
SLP Loudmouths
Summit o/r x-pipe
BBK equal length headers
BBK strut tower brace
Chipped by DynoSources
89GTVert is offline  
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome