AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustang > 94-95 Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions | Mustang Lounge | 5.0 Talk | 5.0 Tech | 94-95 Tech | Mustang Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 12-15-2006   #1 (permalink)
influenze is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 473 Threads: 80
 influenze's Country Flag  View influenze's 29 photos
San Angelo   Texas
Send a message via Yahoo to influenze
Default the quickest stock 5.0

Okay guys, i've got a question for you all. What year was the fastest stock 5.0 produced and what year was the slowest 5.0 produced, and what year is your favorite.
__________________
94' vert with polished bomz cai, magnaflow high flow catted x-pipe, flowmaster series 40's, msd blaster coil, 3:73's, 5 speed manual, yellow top optima battery juicing up the stereo system and more hp coming soon!
influenze is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006   #2 (permalink)
sanitarium16 is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member


Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 150 Threads: 23
 sanitarium16's Country Flag
Bellmore   New York
Default

by slowest you mean the least HP? If thats not the case the SN95 5.0 is the slowest.
__________________
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.7L
sanitarium16 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006   #3 (permalink)
influenze is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 473 Threads: 80
 influenze's Country Flag  View influenze's 29 photos
San Angelo   Texas
Send a message via Yahoo to influenze
Default

slowest meaning 0 to 60 or even 1/4 mile times from a factory stock 5.0 straight outta ford. knowing the horsepower as well would also be nice.
__________________
94' vert with polished bomz cai, magnaflow high flow catted x-pipe, flowmaster series 40's, msd blaster coil, 3:73's, 5 speed manual, yellow top optima battery juicing up the stereo system and more hp coming soon!
influenze is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006   #4 (permalink)
sanitarium16 is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member


Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 150 Threads: 23
 sanitarium16's Country Flag
Bellmore   New York
Default

i believe the 94-95 5.0's were the slowest due to the increase in weight in the SN95. I think the 1989 was the quickest (excluding cobras). The 5.0 ditched its forged internals in 92 i think
__________________
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.7L
sanitarium16 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006   #5 (permalink)
adriano_917 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 851 Threads: 91
 adriano_917's Country Flag  View adriano_917's 33 photos  View adriano_917's 2 classified ads
El Paso   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanitarium16 View Post
i believe the 94-95 5.0's were the slowest due to the increase in weight in the SN95. I think the 1989 was the quickest (excluding cobras). The 5.0 ditched its forged internals in 92 i think
i'm gonna have to disagree with u the mustang gt 94-95 were and are fasters than 86-93 gt mustangs.. the 94-95 gt mustangs do 0 to 60 in 6 flats and 1/4 in low 14's.... with the little mods that i have, i have timed my car from 0 to 60 in 5.76's

1987 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 14.4 (Automobile, April 87
1989 Ford Mustang GT 5.0l Manual 6.2 14.8 (MT Jan ‘89)
1988 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 15.0 (MT Jan ‘88)
1990 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 6.4 14.9
1991 Ford Mustang GT 7.3 15.6
1992 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 6.2 14.8
1985 Ford Mustang GT 6.4 14.9 (C&D, Jan. 85)
adriano_917 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006   #6 (permalink)
adriano_917 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 851 Threads: 91
 adriano_917's Country Flag  View adriano_917's 33 photos  View adriano_917's 2 classified ads
El Paso   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by influenze View Post
slowest meaning 0 to 60 or even 1/4 mile times from a factory stock 5.0 straight outta ford. knowing the horsepower as well would also be nice.
this is a good page if u want to know everything about 82-93 gt mustangs, hope it helps !!!
my favorite mustang is the 1970 mustang boss 302
1982 Mustang GT
adriano_917 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006   #7 (permalink)
influenze is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 473 Threads: 80
 influenze's Country Flag  View influenze's 29 photos
San Angelo   Texas
Send a message via Yahoo to influenze
Default

1994 Ford Mustang ('94) at AmericanMuscle.com use this link and scroll down the page for the specs I came up with on the 94's. My favorite is my 94 convertible gt, but i also like the 92's and 93's.
__________________
94' vert with polished bomz cai, magnaflow high flow catted x-pipe, flowmaster series 40's, msd blaster coil, 3:73's, 5 speed manual, yellow top optima battery juicing up the stereo system and more hp coming soon!
influenze is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006   #8 (permalink)
84 predator mus is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 257 Threads: 6
 84 predator mus's Country Flag  View 84 predator mus's HomePage
Horton   Kansas
Send a message via MSN to 84 predator mus
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanitarium16 View Post
i believe the 94-95 5.0's were the slowest due to the increase in weight in the SN95. I think the 1989 was the quickest (excluding cobras). The 5.0 ditched its forged internals in 92 i think
couldnt agree more. in 93 they went to hypereutectic pistons.

i personally have never seen a bone stock 94-95 5.0 spank a stock 87-92 5.0. when i got my 89 GT back in 2000 it had 95K on it, still had 2.73 stock gears with a trashed 5 speed. went to the track the next day and ran a 14.8 1/4 time. mind you this car has no mods, the air silencer was still hooked up. friend of mine owned a 88 5.0 coupe with SD, had a 5 speed, 3.08 gears, no mods, ran a 14.0 flat in the 1/4 and his motor had around 145K at the time.

the lowest 1/4 time ive seen a 94-95 5.0 go was 15.3 secs. so to say a stock 94-95 vs a stock 87-92 5.0 that the 94-95 is faster is just imaginary.

oh btw , reason i didnt list the 93 in with the foxes vs SN is that the 93 engine is basically the same as the 94-95 5.0, degraded in power and has junk pistons.

just my .02 worth.
__________________
84 Predator Mustang GT302R [Gone]
89GT: built fairly good (sold)
92LX: 4cyl to 5.0 conv. completed on the cheap (sold)
88GT: 302/AOD,stock 2.73's and traclok, LT's, custom 2 1/2" exhaust made by me with thrush chambered mufflers dumped at rear axle, hayden electric fan..more to come, daily driver.
84 predator mus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006   #9 (permalink)
adriano_917 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 851 Threads: 91
 adriano_917's Country Flag  View adriano_917's 33 photos  View adriano_917's 2 classified ads
El Paso   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by influenze View Post
1994 Ford Mustang ('94) at AmericanMuscle.com use this link and scroll down the page for the specs I came up with on the 94's. My favorite is my 94 convertible gt, but i also like the 92's and 93's.
that page is so wrong, i've got the milestone poster wich i bought from ford and the 94gt mustangs does 0 to 60 in 6.2 and 1/4 mile in 14.3. of course the covertibles are a little bit slower.
adriano_917 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006   #10 (permalink)
influenze is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 473 Threads: 80
 influenze's Country Flag  View influenze's 29 photos
San Angelo   Texas
Send a message via Yahoo to influenze
Default

I have the 94 gt convertible, how much slower is it from the hardtop?
__________________
94' vert with polished bomz cai, magnaflow high flow catted x-pipe, flowmaster series 40's, msd blaster coil, 3:73's, 5 speed manual, yellow top optima battery juicing up the stereo system and more hp coming soon!
influenze is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006   #11 (permalink)
FoxChassis is offline Senior Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,442 Threads: 12
 FoxChassis's Country Flag
NOYB
Default

Fastest/quickest would be an '87-'88 (and '89 49-state) SD coupe or a '93 Cobra. One built well from the factory and with a good driver could net high 13s.

Slowest would depend on what you want to put under the umbrella of a "5.0". Ford had been using that designation for the 302 engine since the late '70s. And the '79 Mustang had "5.0" emblems on its fenders just as the '82-'93 5.0L Mustangs did. A 140 HP '79 5.0L Mustang is surely slower than the heaviset of SN95 5.0Ls.
__________________
'83 GT, '84 LTD LX, '85 LTD LX (parts car), '96 B2300 SE, '99 CVPI
FoxChassis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006   #12 (permalink)
influenze is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 473 Threads: 80
 influenze's Country Flag  View influenze's 29 photos
San Angelo   Texas
Send a message via Yahoo to influenze
Default

not including cobra's, just stock gt's
__________________
94' vert with polished bomz cai, magnaflow high flow catted x-pipe, flowmaster series 40's, msd blaster coil, 3:73's, 5 speed manual, yellow top optima battery juicing up the stereo system and more hp coming soon!
influenze is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006   #13 (permalink)
adriano_917 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 851 Threads: 91
 adriano_917's Country Flag  View adriano_917's 33 photos  View adriano_917's 2 classified ads
El Paso   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by influenze View Post
I have the 94 gt convertible, how much slower is it from the hardtop?
like 2 or 3 tenths...
adriano_917 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006   #14 (permalink)
FoxChassis is offline Senior Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,442 Threads: 12
 FoxChassis's Country Flag
NOYB
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by influenze View Post
not including cobra's, just stock gt's
GT = '82+

So you're exluding the '79 "5.0" and any other '82+ model that had a "5.0" but was not a GT, i.e. GL, GLX, and LX?
FoxChassis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2006   #15 (permalink)
influenze is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 473 Threads: 80
 influenze's Country Flag  View influenze's 29 photos
San Angelo   Texas
Send a message via Yahoo to influenze
Default

no, just excluding cobras and other special vehicle team versions, in other words, none that are supercharged
__________________
94' vert with polished bomz cai, magnaflow high flow catted x-pipe, flowmaster series 40's, msd blaster coil, 3:73's, 5 speed manual, yellow top optima battery juicing up the stereo system and more hp coming soon!
influenze is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stock 2.3 head for racing RMcCanney 2.3L Talk 2 09-01-2008 12:15 PM
Mustang II T-5 5.0 Flywheel Questions? bdavid Mustang II Tech 3 06-07-2007 06:52 PM
Modded 5.0 vs my stock 06 very close-video Cdvision Kill Stories 10 07-14-2006 01:58 PM
Stock 5.0 + 1/8 Mile = 9.256 @ 74.91 Greg_Hager Mustang Lounge 9 06-07-2003 04:20 AM
Anyone know stock specs for 1986 Saleen SSC 5.0 cylinder heads? GT Dan 5.0L Tech 4 08-07-2002 05:01 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112