AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 06-05-2008   #1 (permalink)
drewxjn is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 11 Threads: 5
 drewxjn's Country Flag
Irmo   South Carolina
Default 302 horse power

I am going back and forth on whether or not I want to keep the stock 302 or swap it out for a 351w. If I keep the 302 I am going to bore it and stroke it. How much horse power can you get out of a 302 bored 0.030 over with good cam, intake, and everything else. Looking at getting around the 400 mark at the rear wheels. Does anyone now if this is possible?
drewxjn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008   #2 (permalink)
Powered By Ford is offline Rookie


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 11 Threads: 5
 Powered By Ford's Country Flag
Queen Creek   Arizona
Default 302 Building 400 Horses

Getting 400 h.p. out of a 302 is achievable. If you bore it over .030 and run a moderate cam, you'll get about 350 h.p. Figure you port the heads a bit, and and mount a decent four-barrel on it, then you've hit around 400. Lets not forget that you can buy a 347 stroker kit for it. Then you'd be past 400 by a bit. 351W's can build 400 easy too. It's just a matter of what you like better, 302 or 351.
Powered By Ford is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008   #3 (permalink)
Rejoin the Herd is offline Apprentice

5.0L Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127 Threads: 14
 Rejoin the Herd's Country Flag
Southwest
Default

400 hp at the rear wheels means 420 to 430 at the crank. You will need good after market heads, a good cam, dual plane intake, 650 cfm carb, headers and good ignition to make that kind of power from a 302.

Check online under Crate engines. Most builders will list components used to make a variety of horse power from small block fords. This will give you a good idea of the components needed to make the power you want.
Rejoin the Herd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008   #4 (permalink)
rpmcarter is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 498 Threads: 54
 rpmcarter's Country Flag
Kingwood   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powered By Ford View Post
Getting 400 h.p. out of a 302 is achievable. If you bore it over .030 and run a moderate cam, you'll get about 350 h.p. Figure you port the heads a bit, and and mount a decent four-barrel on it, then you've hit around 400. Lets not forget that you can buy a 347 stroker kit for it. Then you'd be past 400 by a bit. 351W's can build 400 easy too. It's just a matter of what you like better, 302 or 351.
What do you consider a moderate cam? also what are the RISK you take by redoing the heads on a 114k engine and putting back together for a while, not quite ready to do a complete rebuild. I posted this before but got no reply. so I'm hitching a ride on this fellas thread.
__________________
"After all ......looks ARE important"

1967 Diamond Blue Convertible
all original
Wifey's ' 71 Mach I
rpmcarter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008   #5 (permalink)
drewxjn is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 11 Threads: 5
 drewxjn's Country Flag
Irmo   South Carolina
Default 302 horse power

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powered By Ford View Post
Getting 400 h.p. out of a 302 is achievable. If you bore it over .030 and run a moderate cam, you'll get about 350 h.p. Figure you port the heads a bit, and and mount a decent four-barrel on it, then you've hit around 400. Lets not forget that you can buy a 347 stroker kit for it. Then you'd be past 400 by a bit. 351W's can build 400 easy too. It's just a matter of what you like better, 302 or 351.

I am looking at boring it .030 over and stroking it to 347. Also looking at Victor Jr. Heads. Looking at a 4 barrel 850 cfm carb. Not sure what type of cam would be best or what flex plate would be best? Will the stock trans be up for this power or should i look at a race ready on? Should i use a dual plane intake or single. Looking at Edelbrock intake. What type of distributor would be the best fit for the 302?
drewxjn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008   #6 (permalink)
66w/son is offline Rookie


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 20 Threads: 1
 66w/son's Country Flag
louisville   Kentucky
Default

my 302 in 66, gt 40 heads, dual plane performer, 0.30 over, mild cam, roller rockers, holley 600, msd hei ignition, hooker headers, c-4 with shift kit and 9 in rear end everything port and polished,balanced,and blueprinted 2500.00 and you get 390 at the crank and around 360 370 at the rear wheels on the dyno.
66w/son is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008   #7 (permalink)
Buckhunter is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 36 Threads: 13
 Buckhunter's Country Flag
Brownstown   Illinois
Default

66 ....... thats not bad ............ I just may use the same formula with my 68
Buckhunter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008   #8 (permalink)
66w/son is offline Rookie


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 20 Threads: 1
 66w/son's Country Flag
louisville   Kentucky
Default drew

850 is to much carb for a smallblock you'll spend a lot of time adjusting and adjusting (air, fuel, timing, vaccuum) ive got a 69 camaro with a 454 and went with a 850 on it ran like **** adjusted constantly finally went down to a 650 and a little timing adjustment and she ran smooth as silk, 600-650 is plenty for a 302. thats just my expereince and opinion.
66w/son is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cheap 2.3 horse power? 93mustang2.3 2.3L Talk 5 07-11-2008 10:17 AM
How Many Horse Power Does 1988 Mustang Stock Heads Support? Millusos 5.0L Talk 1 01-12-2008 07:59 PM
horse power what works best carlover17 5.0L Tech 4 05-03-2006 12:32 AM
What kind of horse power will I have with theese mods ? redhotstang00 V6 Talk 7 09-22-2004 02:45 PM
horse power 5.0L Tech 6 04-17-2002 04:06 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112