AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 11-05-2008   #1 (permalink)
shommel is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 184 Threads: 96
 shommel's Country Flag
Indianapolis   Indiana
Default whats the difference between...

the quick steering ratio box and power steering? also why did gts have the quick steering and not just power steering?(or did they come with both)how tough is it to add power steering to a non power steering 65 mustang?
shommel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008   #2 (permalink)
Veronica is offline Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,024 Threads: 71
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Hello. you could get power steering on a car that also had the GT package, as long as it was an 'A' code car. The K codes all had manual steering in 65/66. The purpose of the quicker steering was to make the car more responsive. Kind of like a sho' 'nuff sports car.

It isn't tough to change a car over to power steering, but, it would be pretty expensive. Besides the pump itsel, along with bracket, you would also need a different drag link and ider arm, along with valve body assembly and the cylinder. Not cheap.
Veronica is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008   #3 (permalink)
67ragtopStang is online now Made Member


Joined: May 2008
Posts: 772 Threads: 39
 67ragtopStang's Country Flag  View 67ragtopStang's 4 photos
Cape Cod   Massachusetts
Default

What is the differnce in ratios for standard and quick ratio steering boxes?
67ragtopStang is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008   #4 (permalink)
Blackshadow is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member
Classic Member


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 157 Threads: 2
 Blackshadow's Country Flag  View Blackshadow's 277 photos
Pacific Northwest   Washington
Default

16:1 for the quick, 20:1 for most non gt manual cars
Blackshadow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008   #5 (permalink)
67ragtopStang is online now Made Member


Joined: May 2008
Posts: 772 Threads: 39
 67ragtopStang's Country Flag  View 67ragtopStang's 4 photos
Cape Cod   Massachusetts
Default

Thanks Blackshadow. Are the gearboxes themselves, the same for power and non-power steering?
67ragtopStang is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008   #6 (permalink)
Blackshadow is offline Apprentice

2.3L Member
Classic Member


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 157 Threads: 2
 Blackshadow's Country Flag  View Blackshadow's 277 photos
Pacific Northwest   Washington
Default

Most steering boxs using power steering unit are 20:1 ( just because more standard cars produced) but since the gearbox isn't a hydraulic motor and you just basically need the drag link and ider arm, along with valve body assembly and the cylinder, it will work with both. but like Veronica says above it is costly unless you can find used .. but most of the used is worn out. For all new guessing it would be $2000+ if I was going to spend that much I would look at the rack and pinion setups. I have seen them for non power $875 plus or minus, for power setup for $1100 to $1500. but you still would need a pump.
Blackshadow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008   #7 (permalink)
65rangoon is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: May 2008
Posts: 69 Threads: 5
 65rangoon's Country Flag
West Chicago   Illinois
Default

it would be pretty expensive to change over. just the drag link/valve (all 1 unit on 65/66) is $450-500 alone. then the hoses are about $50, the slave cylinder, different LH inner tie rod, power steering pump
65rangoon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2008   #8 (permalink)
kens67mustang is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 198 Threads: 4
 kens67mustang's Country Flag  View kens67mustang's 62 photos  View kens67mustang's 1 classified ad
altoona   Pennsylvania
Default powersteering

Quote:
Originally Posted by shommel View Post
the quick steering ratio box and power steering? also why did gts have the quick steering and not just power steering?(or did they come with both)how tough is it to add power steering to a non power steering 65 mustang?

powersteer is different from a quick ratio box.....you could get a quick ratio,without the powersteeing,the quick ratio box is just that, the ratio for the gears in the box allow for quicker response for steering effort,while the p/s makes the turning easier.a performance enhansment for sure .
kens67mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008   #9 (permalink)
The Greek is offline Senior Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,538 Threads: 0
 The Greek's Country Flag
Jacksonville   Florida
Default

All manual steering boxes were 19:1 with the exception of the "Special Handling" boxes which were 16:1.

All of the power steering boxes were 16:1. The P/S system used on the early Mustang was an external power assist. The system was separate from the steering box. The later P/S systems have the power assist built into the steering box. That started in 1971.

The 19:1 boxes are easier to steer, but it takes more turns of the steering wheel to go full right to full left. The 16:1 box takes more effort, but also less turns of the steering wheel.

A large diameter steering wheel also lessens the turning effort on a manual steering set up. That's why old cars have such huge steering wheels, most had manual steering and that's how they lessened the effort.

I put the quicker 16:1 box on my manual steering and I suggest not going to any smaller steering wheel than a 14". Especially with wide tires.

I wouldn't waste my money on converting to a stock P/S system. The things were always problematic and to see those hoses hanging down under the car, sucks. If you want P/S go with the rack and pinion system, as said. It'll be cheaper, easy to install and definitely less problems.
The Greek is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2008   #10 (permalink)
1965stang is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 173 Threads: 12
 1965stang's Country Flag
Carrollton   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Greek View Post
A large diameter steering wheel also lessens the turning effort on a manual steering set up. That's why old cars have such huge steering wheels, most had manual steering and that's how they lessened the effort.

I wouldn't waste my money on converting to a stock P/S system. The things were always problematic and to see those hoses hanging down under the car, sucks. If you want P/S go with the rack and pinion system, as said. It'll be cheaper, easy to install and definitely less problems.
+1 with what The Greek said. I took my old steering wheel/column off last weekend in preparation for my R&P install this weekend - that thing was huge when I got it off finally. That comment aside, I totally agree with The Greek and the R&P decision for power steering. I did tons of research about swapping out all my manual stuff and converting over to power steering. Then one day I realized, why would I spend all that money converting over to a power steering system and technology that's 40+ years old, when for a little more I could get modern steering. That swayed me, but you may be going for a more vintage look/feel using the older power steering systems. It all comes down to what you want to get out of it.
__________________
2003 V-6 - the usual bolt-ons. Gremlin taking up residence in the idler pulley. I'll finish this one when I'm done with the other one.
1965 coupe - Born - straight six standard issue
Now - 5.0 motor, T5 tranny, R&P, full length subframe connectors, draglink bars, hedman headers
Coming soon - disc brakes, electronic ignition and a whole host of other stuff I forgot to mention. The list goes on and on. Basically, it's my new toy
1965stang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big difference with JLT and 93 race tune blackstang17 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 5 07-18-2008 07:39 PM
Difference between Programmers ApollDest V6 Talk 2 05-03-2007 01:02 PM
Camshafts Difference KY COBRA 4.6L Talk 2 04-25-2007 08:06 PM
Stragety Flash vs X-Cal 2: Difference? bigwilly43729 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 3 04-22-2007 12:22 PM
Is there a difference between the 1995 and 1996 dash?? JFIVEO Mustang Tech 6 05-17-2005 09:26 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112