AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 01-12-2009   #1 (permalink)
kzoo67fastback is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5 Threads: 2
 kzoo67fastback's Country Flag
SW Mich.   Michigan
Default 400 hp 289 ?

I am looking to build an original 289 to make my 67 fastback more driveable and cheaper to operate (enjoy).

A little story. My father spent 5 years purchasing the proper parts to rebuild an original 69' Boss 302. Once his work was completed, it found a home in his 67 fastback. A couple of months after putting the Boss into the fastback he suffered some major health issues which led to him losing a leg (no gas pedal action there).

Needless to say the car was not driven in close to 3 years by him or me for that matter. Kind of hard to see someone taking care of your baby right and I felt guilty. I kept it warm and made sure the fluids were ok.

He passed away earlier this year and my Mom gave me the fastback. My dad had this thing for about 22 years and it brought me alot of joy to have the keys.

One problem though...the Boss 14 to 1 compression and only runs on 110 and higher. When you only get 4 miles to the gallon anyway you don't spend much time cruising when the fuel is $6-7/gal.

My solution is this: unload the Boss on someone who is looking for an ORIGINAL 69' Boss motor; spend the proceeds building a hot 289.

Can a 289 be built to 400+ hp?

Thanks.

Sorry for rambling. SMB
kzoo67fastback is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009   #2 (permalink)
Jonk67 is offline Made Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 629 Threads: 10
 Jonk67's Country Flag  View Jonk67's 1 photo
Smyrna   Tennessee
Default

I read an article on the '67 TransAm series Coupes and they (Shelby Team) cranked the 289 out to 390-410HP can't remember exactly. I believe you would have to wind it up around 8K to get that HP though so it still wouldn't be a streetable motor (hard to idle,low vac., etc.) and I'm sure your mileage wouldn't approach double digits either.
I'm stroking my 289 to 331 just to be on the conservative side and get some mpg, have no idea what the HP will be at but adding AFR alum. heads.
If you stay all stock and stroke to 347 your stock heads would probably need some serious professional work in order to flow, ford heads are very restrictive, that's why the Boss got the large valve 351C heads.

Keep us updated on what route you go and the HP/TQ #'s you get. After my rebuild I want to dyno mine just for curiousity.
Jon
Jonk67 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009   #3 (permalink)
blea9082 is offline Apprentice

Classic Member
4.6L Member


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 130 Threads: 3
 blea9082's Country Flag  View blea9082's 16 photos
Littleton   Colorado
Default

A 289 certainly can put out >400hp, but like jonk67 says, it would not be a good motor for street driving. What you really want to have are good torque numbers, at as low an rpm as you can get. Torque is what you feel on the street, makes the car seem powerful. That is why a stroked or stroked and bored motor is recommended because with higher cubic inch displacement you usually get higher torque.

By the way, you might want to "post" the B302 engine for sale on www.boss302.com. Somebody there will want it for sure. But don't describe it as "original". A stock B302 had 10.7:1 compression, so if yours has 14:1, it has been modified and certainly not original any more.

Good luck!
__________________
1969 Boss 302 (Vintage Race Car) Calypso Coral
2002 Saleen SC281 True Blue
1967 Coupe, 5-speed, Grabber Orange
blea9082 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009   #4 (permalink)
Rejoin the Herd is offline Apprentice

5.0L Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 127 Threads: 14
 Rejoin the Herd's Country Flag
Southwest
Default

To make 400 hp with a 289 you will need at least 10 to 1 compression and peak power at about 7800 rpm. To do this would take race quality engine parts (meaning all forged internals, race prepped after market heads, roller cam, etc. Two big problems with such an engine, will be almost impossible to drive on the street, but bigger problem is the 289 block will not last long turning the rpm needed to produce 400 hp.

Also due to short cylinder bore (the cylinder bores do not reach down into the block far enough to support the pistons when stroked), a 289 is not a good block to stroke.

You may want to consider a 302 crate engine stroked to 331 or 347. With good heads, cam, intake, and headers many crate engines are close to 400 hp.

Google crate engine. There are many companies that sell them.
Rejoin the Herd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009   #5 (permalink)
Dustysdawg is offline Apprentice


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 77 Threads: 7
 Dustysdawg's Country Flag  View Dustysdawg's 8 photos
Sierra Madre   California
Default

You can get 302's crate motors with 460 HP and 400 ft/lbs of torque from Motorsport or Roush. They are not exactly 302's because they are stroker 347's, but it is the same block. They both have catalogs that you can download with all different variation of these motors.

Motorsport uses a new boss 302 with 4 bolt mains. The Roush uses 302's with 2 bolt mains. Both run about 9:1 or 9.5:1 compression and made to run on pump gas. Both max out at under 6000 rpm.

Another interesting site to learn about this stuff is FordStrokers.com 331-347-393-408-418-427 stroker kits and ford parts.

DD
Dustysdawg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009   #6 (permalink)
Buckhunter is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 36 Threads: 13
 Buckhunter's Country Flag
Brownstown   Illinois
Default

stroke it to a 347 ...........
__________________
I bought a Comp Cams hydraulic roller instead of a custom ground cam because j.allen at camshaft innovations has the ABSOLUTE WORST customer relations I have ever experienced ................... 8^) ................... I LOVE my Comp cam ........ thanks j.
Buckhunter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009   #7 (permalink)
kzoo67fastback is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5 Threads: 2
 kzoo67fastback's Country Flag
SW Mich.   Michigan
Default

Thanks for the input everyone. I am definately not looking to put together a race motor and had thought it may be easier to put a crate 302 in the car. My thought is if I change the motor on this car again, I am not going smaller than what it currently has, and it will be the last time.

Well it looks like I got some options and can't do anything until the snows leaves us for the year.

Its nice to have a place to go for engine info. I am a body/resto man and while I know how an engine works, the techinical things are beyond me.

Thanks again.
kzoo67fastback is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009   #8 (permalink)
67frankenstang is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 34 Threads: 11
 67frankenstang's Country Flag
Camden   New Jersey
Default

once i get my 289 properly tuned dyno'd, ill post up the numbers. this probably wont be untill it gets alittle nicer outside. i have forged pistons, balanced crank, extremely worked heads, a decent sized cam, 10.5 / 1 compression, its .30 over, edelbrock 6500 rmp intake and a 750 carb. when i had the car open headers, it sounded like a full out race car, and with the full exhaust it sounds like a nasty street car. i cant wait to get the numbers.
__________________
1967 Ford Mustang Coupe.
Worked 289, built up C4 transmission and 8 inch HD rear. Full MSD ignition, Edelrock 750 carberator and 6500RPM intake, hooker supercomp headers, 3 inch x-pipe and 50 series flowmasters. many other mods.
"Daily driver" 2007 Ram 1500 quad cab Hemi with CAI, Exhaust, cosmetic mods
67frankenstang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009   #9 (permalink)
paul289 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 568 Threads: 9
 paul289's Country Flag  View paul289's 6 photos
Marysville   Washington
Default

Sounds similar to mine. Got the 1.94/1.6 valves and all, put out 180 hp using a Comp Cams XE250H camshaft (250 degrees duration, 206 @ .05" lift). Don't get your hopes too high.
__________________
Proud owner of a '65 289 coupe w/ C4. Equipped with Edelbrock Performer intake K&N air filter, and 600 cfm carb, Comp Cams Xtreme Energy valvetrain, Comp Cams XE262H cam, MSD ignition, and ported heads. Suspended by 600# 1" drop front and stock rear springs, KYB shocks, 1" front and 7/8" rear sway bars, and Traction Master style traction bars. Your friendly suspension kid.
paul289 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
289 engine balance internal or external? sgomustang Classic Talk 11 05-27-2009 12:58 PM
Is there a stroker kit for the 289 Block? geo65 Classic Tech 8 05-21-2009 01:50 PM
What would you pay for a 289 block? 74stang2togo Classic Talk 8 09-24-2008 09:21 PM
1986 Mustang 289 Hipo heads need new pushrods? 5LiterJeff 5.0L Tech 10 04-06-2007 05:31 PM
351 w exhaust on 289 steve shields Classic Tech 4 09-20-2006 06:00 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112