I'm going to throw in my 2 cents about reproduction parts since I'm going through a restoration of a '68 Mustang coupe at this time.
My advice...WHENEVER POSSIBLE, REUSE YOUR OLD PARTS!!!!
I've been involved with Mustangs ever since I purchased my very first car, a '68 fastback in 1988.
My first NPD catalog looked more like a comic book than the current 250+ pages. So many more parts are available in reproduction than ever before...in one hand, this is great since we have so many options. On the other hand, we now have more inferior quality reproduction pieces being made that is maybe 80% to 85% accurate to the original piece it replicates.
Here are a few recent examples of what I'm talking about.
Front bumper- Dynacorn reproduction..attractive price of a little over $100...Unfortunately, I had to go through three bumpers before I could even present a bumper to my body man. Two had terrible weld beads along the edges of the bumper that were chromed over and the third had a wave issue in the bumper. I eventually went to a local bumper shop that had several original cores sitting on a shelf and purchased a bumper that had a superior chrome finish, thicker material, and better fit. It cost me twice as much as the reproduction piece would have been, but in the end it was worth it.
Lower Driver Door Hinge - Scott Drake
I thought I would be saving myself some time by buying a Scott Drake labeled reproduction piece, rather than rebuild the original...what a mistake. My body shop calls me one day complaining about how the driver door moves up and down and does not have the proper door detent hold when it is partially opened. Sure enough, the inferior reproduction part is to blame. I ended up rebuilding the original piece with a hinge kit and having my brother in-law weld a small crack. The door works like it should now.
Instrument cluster lens kit from Mustangs Unlimited-
Clear Lens ok, but the silver centers were totally unlike the original. I ended up purchasing a set of Scott Drake pieces which were closer to the originals.
Vent window seals. Scott Drake reproduction
I bought a pair and the driver's side piece had a problem. Looked almost like it was pulled from a mold too quickly. Returned the item for another one and it was better.
I have to say the most frustrating part of my current restoration is having to deal with part returns because of inferior quality issues. Where's the quality control before sending these parts out to the consumer at the factory or even with the parts vendor?
I have to waste my time repacking items for returns and spending my own money for shipping the item back to the vendor. What about the delays during the restoration???...I have to send back part "A" because it didn't fit right, so now I have to wait for a replacement or find an alternate part. In the meantime, I can't go on with the restoration, because part "A" is needed before I can assemble item "B".
Paul,
Thank you for your honesty about Scott Drake. You admit to repackaging items sold behind the Scott Drake label when in fact it is made overseas by another vendor. Frankly, I used to think the Scott Drake name meant something....a quality reproduction part you could count on for fit and finish. Why would you cheapen your reputation by putting out reproduction parts you already know don't meet OEM specs and have quality control issues just to make a buck? If these vendors are the only source, drop them. Maybe consider tooling them yourselves or find an alternate source that can make them to the level of quality we should expect.
When I hear the Scott Drake name now, I think.... a quality reproduction part you could count on... about 22% of the time! Please feel free to bring this up during your next company meeting.
Mike, you hit the nail on the head....
