AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 10-05-2005   #1 (permalink)
rstbkt69 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9 Threads: 5
 rstbkt69's Country Flag
Ridgecrest   California
Default Need Advise! Rebuilding 1969 Coupe ...Should I go with original 6 or install

I'm rebuilding a 69 coupe for my wife (yeah right). She really wanted a 6cyl because of economy and she doesn't intend on driving it too hard. The parts car has a 200 cid that looks good on the outside. The old oil is not too dark and the tranny that is in the car has clean fluid also. The car I'm working on has a running 250 cid that needs a rebuild. At least a valve job will be needed and I thought I may as well go through the whole thing. Before I figured out the difference in engine sizes my original thought was to rebuld the motor in the parts car so she could still drive the other car as I made progress on all the restoration I could before taking the driveable car out of commission. That way she could drive her car for a longer period before i tore into it. What I will actually be doing is taking things off the driveable car and putting them into the parts car. The whole undercarriage of the drivable car is rusted something terrible. The donor car is rust free and just needs everything from the car with the 250 cid. So what would you do? keep a number matching engine in the final project. Put in the larger engine. Or convince her to put in a 289 or a 302. I haven't found many parts for the 250. the 200 seems to have alot of parts out there but not near as much as a small block V-8.
Thanks
Jim
rstbkt69 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2005   #2 (permalink)
ScottHalliday is offline Site Administrator


Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,765 Threads: 398
 ScottHalliday's Country Flag  View ScottHalliday's 3664 photos  View ScottHalliday's 167 products for your review  View ScottHalliday's HomePage
St. John's   Newfoundland
Send a message via Yahoo to ScottHalliday
Default

Sounds like a great project. I think I would go with 289 V8 but hang onto the original 6 cylinder. From what I understand it is not that difficult to convert your 6 cylinder pony to a small block V8. The 289 engine is a sweet heart. I would definately take the performance over the fuel economy besides the 289 is not much harder on fuel. One thing for sure your pony would have alot more get up and go, and from my perspective more fun to drive. Just my thoughts.
__________________
Scott Halliday
Site Administrator
1992 Red 347 Automatic Limited Edition Convertible
1991 Red 5.0L 5-Speed Hatchback
1989 Black 5.0L 5-Speed Coupe
ScottHalliday is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2005   #3 (permalink)
5.0 in a 66 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 682 Threads: 2
 5.0 in a 66's Country Flag
Parkersburg   West Virginia
Default

A 250ci car basically is a V8 car. They use a V8 8" rear, and 5-lug V8 front suspension and brakes. You'd need a radiator, engine, and V8 engine bay wiring, and V8 motor mounts. It's a lot easier than doing it on any other year, and it looks like it would be about $250 in new parts plus a motor. I'd do it in a microsecond
HTH
__________________
66 coupe 5.0/T5, home-brewed power 4 wheel disc setup, 350hp+, looks like it belongs in 1968
5.0 in a 66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2005   #4 (permalink)
Jess is offline Apprentice

Classic Member
V6 Member


Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 214 Threads: 38
 Jess's Country Flag  View Jess's 6 photos
Modesto   California
Default 6 or V8

Guys

The 250 car is best to do. Believe it or not the hard stuff is done. You have the suspension, you have the brakes and probably good rear gears. Mustangs Plus has the new adjustable motor mounts 5.0,302 or 351 sits in there as pretty as you please. I had a custom radiator built 4 core 24 inch with a flex or clutch fan and it is a done deal. A piece of cake.

Don't do the 200. It is a snake pit. That is what I started with. It is really more work and money than it is worth unless there is one big special reason driving you like your wife and that was the car you went on your honeymoon in and you were the first owner. Do the 250, you won't be sorry.

Jess
Jess is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005   #5 (permalink)
rstbkt69 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9 Threads: 5
 rstbkt69's Country Flag
Ridgecrest   California
Default

Just about got her convinced to let me drop a 289 or a 302 in it. A Fastback blew past us yesterday with a really sweet sound and I told he a six would not sound like that. Even though I have heard so nice sounding 6's.
rstbkt69 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1969 Coupe How much for a Californian Car? krankieone Classic Talk 8 10-07-2003 03:28 PM
What is the Original Radio in a 1969 M-Code MACH I YodaFan1138 Classic Tech 2 03-11-2003 09:26 PM
Need list of original colors offered for my 68 coupe? cdn mustang Classic Tech 2 12-18-2002 03:34 PM
Should I install Cable Clutch or Hydrolic Clutch in my 1967 Coupe? X1Lightning Classic Tech 8 11-24-2002 04:45 AM
Want to install a tach in a 67 Coupe. please help. Shovel Man Classic Tech 12 10-12-2002 10:03 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112