AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Talk
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 11-11-2006   #1 (permalink)
PaulK is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8 Threads: 3
 PaulK's Country Flag
Pierre   South Dakota
Default Looking for advice on a '66 coupe performance build

Greetings. I have found a 351W that I'm currently planning on stroking to 418 or 427 for my '66 coupe. Just not sure if that's the best way to go or instead stay with a 347 stroker that I'm sure would fit much better as a direct bolt-in replacement for the 289 currently in there? I'd like to have somewhere between 400 - 500hp and as much of an aggressive rumble as possible but keep the car streetable. Cruising will be it's primary purpose with an occasional trip to the track where I'd like to be in the low 12's/high 11's. My other plans besides all the necessary goodies for the motor are a 3000 or so stall converter and 3.50 posi setup in back.

I'd sure appreciate any advice anyone might have on things to consider in this build. I'm not set on going any specific route other then, again, I want it to be as radical as possible without giving up the ability to enjoy taking it cruising. I'm also not willing to "chop" the car up to make it a better racer. Just can't bring myself to do that to a nice old '66 coupe!

Thanks in advance for any advice you may have!
PaulK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006   #2 (permalink)
gsharapa is offline Rookie


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2 Threads: 0
 gsharapa's Country Flag
Frisco   Texas
Default 1966 Gt 350r

I've had both and the 351 is much more of a challenge to put in. You can very easy make 500 plus HP with the 347 and tons of items to purchase for that engine so I'd recommend staying with the 347. Mine has a 450 HP 347 with webers.....
__________________
Gary
GT 350R
gsharapa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006   #3 (permalink)
PaulK is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8 Threads: 3
 PaulK's Country Flag
Pierre   South Dakota
Default

Thanks for the advice, Gary. That has been my one concern with the 351. I was looking at it last night and wonder if I'm not going to have hood clearance issues with it as well. I also just put brand new Edelbrock carb and Performer intake on the 289 that's in there plus new water pump, all new chrome, etc, and it would be nice to still be able to use some of that stuff at least to start (I fear the 600 carb won't be enough anymore though).

If I do stick with the 347, any suggestions from your past experience on what stroker kit to go with and which heads work best for this application? I'd like to shoot for that 10.5:1 CR mark or so because I want to be able to run pump gas.

Thanks again!
PaulK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006   #4 (permalink)
5.0 in a 66 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 682 Threads: 2
 5.0 in a 66's Country Flag
Parkersburg   West Virginia
Default

If you want to build a 347, I'd use a Performer RPM intake, 600 or 750cfm carb, custom cam, 11:1 compression, headers, and CNC Trickflow heads. You can get 11:1 to run on 89 octane easily with the proper cam. I'd expect about 475hp out of it. You may also consider a Wieland excellerator single plane intake and a possible 490-500hp with plenty of lowend torque.
__________________
66 coupe 5.0/T5, home-brewed power 4 wheel disc setup, 350hp+, looks like it belongs in 1968
5.0 in a 66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006   #5 (permalink)
PaulK is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8 Threads: 3
 PaulK's Country Flag
Pierre   South Dakota
Default

Thanks 5.0! What are your thoughts on the Victor Jr intake? I'm guessing that's pretty comparable to the Weiand you are referring too. Any suggestions on the right cam specs (lift, duration, etc)?
PaulK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006   #6 (permalink)
5.0 in a 66 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 682 Threads: 2
 5.0 in a 66's Country Flag
Parkersburg   West Virginia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulK
Thanks 5.0! What are your thoughts on the Victor Jr intake? I'm guessing that's pretty comparable to the Weiand you are referring too. Any suggestions on the right cam specs (lift, duration, etc)?
I think the VicJR is too big for 99.99% of street engines, not to mention it's near impossible to fit under the hood. The Wieland eXcellerator is a mild single plane more akin to a PerformerRPM than anything, not comparable at all to a VicJR.

I could put together some cam specs when I get in front of my PC this evening. What are you wanting? Hydraulic or solid cam? Roller cam or traditional? These will make a big difference in the specs. What trans? How tame do you want it to be? These are all questions a REAL custom cam place will ask (I see you answered some of them in your original post of I'd be asking more )
HTH
--Kyle
__________________
66 coupe 5.0/T5, home-brewed power 4 wheel disc setup, 350hp+, looks like it belongs in 1968
5.0 in a 66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006   #7 (permalink)
1965mustang is offline Apprentice

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 117 Threads: 8
 1965mustang's Country Flag
Atlanta   Georgia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulK
Greetings. I have found a 351W that I'm currently planning on stroking to 418 or 427 for my '66 coupe. Just not sure if that's the best way to go or instead stay with a 347 stroker that I'm sure would fit much better as a direct bolt-in replacement for the 289 currently in there?
I've tried both engines. I'd never do the 351W again. You'll end up with no clearance for maintenance, expensive headers, and too much weight on the front.

I'd suggest the 347/331 stroker.
__________________
1965 Mustang FIA vintage road race car
1995 Mustang Cobra R
1994 Mustang Cobra (purchased new)
2004 F350 SD XLT Sport 4X4 V10
2010 Mustang GT w/ Track Pack
1971 Porsche 911
1973 Porsche 911 2.7L
1965mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006   #8 (permalink)
PaulK is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8 Threads: 3
 PaulK's Country Flag
Pierre   South Dakota
Default

I appreciate all your guys' advice and it sounds like the 347 is definitely the way to go.

As for the cam, so far I've been told I should go with a hydraulic roller. I want it to sound as radical as possible but without harming performance or streetability. There is a C-4 in the car and I have been figuring on a converter in the 3000-3500 stall range but that too is up for debate/suggestions.

Clear as mud?!
PaulK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2006   #9 (permalink)
Knightnsd is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: May 2006
Posts: 81 Threads: 8
 Knightnsd's Country Flag  View Knightnsd's 5 photos
San Diego   California
Default

I have not tried the 347 but will tell you that my s code was missing its big block and I went with the stroked windsor. It made it around the shock towers but the HOOD CLEARANCE gets tight , limiting my air cleaner options and I dropped the spacer plate I was hoping to lift the carb up a bit with.
Knightnsd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2006   #10 (permalink)
5.0 in a 66 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 682 Threads: 2
 5.0 in a 66's Country Flag
Parkersburg   West Virginia
Default

A Hydraulic roller 347ci with 220/220 duration and .549/.549 lift and a 110 LSA installed straight up made 483hp with a set of AFR 165 heads, 10.5:1 compression, port matched wieland excellerator, 750cfm, headers, and a windage tray.

Hyd roller is only feasable with a roller 86-01 block, otherwise you're looking at upside of 1k for the cam retrofit
__________________
66 coupe 5.0/T5, home-brewed power 4 wheel disc setup, 350hp+, looks like it belongs in 1968
5.0 in a 66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2006   #11 (permalink)
gsharapa is offline Rookie


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2 Threads: 0
 gsharapa's Country Flag
Frisco   Texas
Default

Paul,

Give Keith Craft a call (Keith Craft Racing) as he is an expert in building small and big block Fords. He builds a killer 331 stroker but he can do most any small or big block Ford. His speciality is heads and horse power!!! I had one of his 427 small blocks in a superformance cobra. Made 638 HP, 93 Octain and very streetable. Sounded awesome.........He has a great website as follows:

http://www.keithcraft.com/

Example of his 450 HP 331/347 strokers:

331/347 standard crate engine
450hp
425 ft. lbs. of torque
$7,475.00 331/347 standard crate engine
450hp/425 ft pounds of torque
Fully machined production block, New Scat or Eagle 4340 forged crank, New Scat or Eagle 4340 H beam rods, Mahle coated or SRP forged pistons, Plasma moly rings, Federal Mogul bearings, Hyd roller camshaft, Hyd roller lifters, AFR 185 heads or cnc’d Brodix 5.0 Heads, Scorpion roller rockers, ARP head bolts, Fel Pro gaskets, Edelbrock Victor Jr intake, Canton 7qt oil pan, Ford Racing damper and spacer, 28 oz balanced, blueprinted and assembled. Includes carburetor, water pump, distributor with polymer gear, Ford Racing or Moroso plug wires, Keith Craft logo'd valve covers & gaskets. ............$7,475
Call 1-870-246-7460 or Email Us
__________________
Gary
GT 350R
gsharapa is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006   #12 (permalink)
PaulK is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8 Threads: 3
 PaulK's Country Flag
Pierre   South Dakota
Default

Thank you all for the wonderful advice. I was rummaging around at the local salvage yard today and found some 5.0's in Crown Vics and Lincolns ranging from '88 through '90 which, from the way it sounds, should all be rollers (right?) so I'm going to head out again tomorrow to take one out and bring it home.

Now it's on to figuring out which 9" rearend to get from the same place to replace my 8". I'm going to post a new thread asking for advice there too so if any of you guys are willing and able to help I would once again be very appreciative!
PaulK is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2007   #13 (permalink)
kens67mustang is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 250 Threads: 4
 kens67mustang's Country Flag  View kens67mustang's 62 photos  View kens67mustang's 1 classified ad
altoona   Pennsylvania
Default 8" vs 9"

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulK View Post
Thank you all for the wonderful advice. I was rummaging around at the local salvage yard today and found some 5.0's in Crown Vics and Lincolns ranging from '88 through '90 which, from the way it sounds, should all be rollers (right?) so I'm going to head out again tomorrow to take one out and bring it home.

Now it's on to figuring out which 9" rearend to get from the same place to replace my 8". I'm going to post a new thread asking for advice there too so if any of you guys are willing and able to help I would once again be very appreciative!

you are aware,you can still use the 8"........it'll take the power up to around 450hp..............the 9" will take more.
kens67mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whats the widest tire you fit on 1965 Mustang Coupe 65289pony Classic Tech 11 09-26-2008 07:46 PM
1967 Shelby Coupe Spec/Info?? ADClark1966 Classic Talk 6 01-09-2008 10:24 PM
Just A Little More Performance Please SCHOONER Classic Tech 3 06-12-2006 11:25 PM
Evolution Performance Dyno Day - Saturday, June 17th Evolution Mid Atlantic 1 06-07-2006 12:02 PM
coupe to convert. spitters Introductions 1 05-31-2006 10:57 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110