Thoughts on 390 engine performance? 1968 Mustang GT
Discuss Thoughts on 390 engine performance? 1968 Mustang GT on AllFordMustangs.com, the place for Mustang enthusiasts.
- Page 3
Welcome to our Mustang forums where Mustangers come together to hang out, discuss and enjoy their favorite Mustang hobby with fellow Mustang enthusiasts. We invite everyone to read, post, and enjoy our Mustang forum as well as the many other sections of our site.
You are currently viewing our forums as a guest. By joining our community you gain access to post topics, communicate with members, upload your photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and free so why wait, join our Mustang community today! If you have any problems with registration or your account login, please contact support.
Not sure why anyone would not use a 390 if its an original 390 car. Scat makes some awesome stroker cranks that are a drop in deal,do some head work decent carb easy 450 hp I race a 67 mustang in c/sa 3090 lbs 10.84 by best et... thats a stocker... give me a stroker crank bigger cam...... you get the pic ....LOL
Umm..my 390 car hasnt been a street car in a long time although i own a 1968 car with a 428 that is around that 450 number i put maybe 6-8 thousand a year on gets around 14 mpg but.....370 gear loose convertor, big carb wasnt concernd with mileage.:nogrinner as far as a crawler motor i think the fe is just tooooo heavy even with aluminum heads really any big block i think ( just my opinion )
Ah, I see that is interesting. Reason I ask is because the ZL1 427 engine was completely aluminum, and allegedly produced over 500 hp--now at what cost to MPG I'm not sure, but I guess it was the actual engine architecture that did it.