AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 01-16-2008   #31 (permalink)
Veronica is online now Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,314 Threads: 70
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmp6 View Post
The old hot rods had slow engines compared to what you can use now and hot rodding means put the biggest engine in the smallest car.I dislike the mod motor after working at a ford dealer ship here.If i wanted to be different id use a gmc 478 v6 or a tt ford 300.
Hi again. You could use one of those motors. The only problem would be that if someone else used the flathead out of a 49 merc in an identical car, you would have to get used to getting your @ss handed to you. The last series flatheads weren't anything resembling slow. They had all of the advantages of an overhead cam with none of the drawbacks. Those were not slow motors.
Veronica is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008   #32 (permalink)
Cobra6 is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 470 Threads: 2
 Cobra6's Country Flag  View Cobra6's HomePage
Madison   Alabama
Default pretty much sums up this whole thread.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veronica View Post
Hello. : You have a customer that's an idiot. Anyone that would come up with the idea of going through the hassle of fitting a 350 chevy motor into the car, instead of a 351 cleveland, which is a stronger motor and will basically drop right in, doesn't exactly have all of their oars in the water to begin with. I would refuse to do it and just tell him it's because of liability issues, instead of because he's retarded.

Thanks Veronica! - you made my day!
__________________
Beri Fraley
Strong, Proud and Ugly

If you find yourself in a fair fight, you haven't been trained properly.
Cobra6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2008   #33 (permalink)
Veronica is online now Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,314 Threads: 70
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Hi again. That's my job. To spread a little sunshine into the lives of those around me.
Veronica is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008   #34 (permalink)
c6matt is offline Rookie


Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 25 Threads: 6
 c6matt's Country Flag
Birch Run   Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veronica View Post
The last series flatheads weren't anything resembling slow. They had all of the advantages of an overhead cam with none of the drawbacks. Those were not slow motors.
aside from being detonation prone due to the L shped combustion chamber... thats why the flathead died.....ford was behind in engine technogy in the early 50's.. due to a stubborness on henery fords part... its not even debatable..if you want to read about it lee Iococca wote all about it in his book... ..
I have seen a 350 in a 65 mustang, yes it was weird... but to say an SBC is inferior to a SBF doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me... as an engineer.. what is the reasoning, the mechanics behind it? as for cost of aftermarket parts it still seems cheaper to go chevy engine... and early mustang parts are cheaper in general than early mustang parts... I just enjoy cars... and hey, if a guy offered me a chance to take a spin in his chevy powered ford or vice-versa I'm going.. now a V-tec or nissan... thats just sad.. now you need metric wrenches on an old mustang....
c6matt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008   #35 (permalink)
paul289 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 562 Threads: 9
 paul289's Country Flag  View paul289's 6 photos
Marysville   Washington
Default

Ford motors can be built just as easily as Chevy motors. And for similar expense. Therefore, it would be cheaper to put a Ford motor into a Mustang, because you don't need custom motor mounts or bellhousings or crossmembers. So, from a practical standpoint, it is better to coordinate. While we're on the topic of poor coordination, a friend of mine suggested installing a Toyota Supra motor in my Mustang. No thanks.
paul289 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008   #36 (permalink)
andrewmp6 is offline Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,158 Threads: 3
 andrewmp6's Country Flag
Louisville   Kentucky
Default

Try pricing building up a flat head 10 grand for the over head valve kit i can get a world man o war for 10 grand and its 600hp 575 foot pounds 460ci small block.Heres a ford 302 in a camaro The Hot Rod Homepage » Blog Archive » Ford Powered Camaro
andrewmp6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2008   #37 (permalink)
diesel99 is offline Rookie


Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 31 Threads: 5
 diesel99's Country Flag
Fowlerville   Michigan
Default

WHY, WHY, OH WHY, WOULD SOMBODY WANT AN ENGINE WITH THE DISTRIBUTOR UNDER YOUR COWL? We have a name for people like this "Cross dressers".
diesel99 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009   #38 (permalink)
JS73Droptop is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9 Threads: 1
 JS73Droptop's Country Flag
Plainfield   Indiana
Default

That's just as bad as the SBC powered 71 Duster that ran at Pinks All Out here in Indianapolis back in May.
__________________
Current Blue Oval Collection:
'73 Mustang Convertible-w.i.p.

'94 Crown Vic LX-daily driver

Gone but never forgotten:

1981 Fox-body hatchback(my first car)
JS73Droptop is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009   #39 (permalink)
Angliagasser is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 73 Threads: 15
 Angliagasser's Country Flag  View Angliagasser's 1 photo
Rochester   Washington
Default

Like they say, "You can't fix stupid"!
Angliagasser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009   #40 (permalink)
disdrummin is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 7 Threads: 3
 disdrummin's Country Flag
Salem   Oregon
Default

I know he's your customer but please try and steer him from ruining a great car, theres no need to put a chevy in there when you could do it with a ford. I hate to vent but i really hate seeing chev 350's in fords. If i saw that car at a show i would be really disappointed. He should just get a camaro, if he wants a chevy engine. Just my opinion, i saw it on the post and couldn't help but reply.
disdrummin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009   #41 (permalink)
andrewmp6 is offline Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,158 Threads: 3
 andrewmp6's Country Flag
Louisville   Kentucky
Default

I'm not trying to be a jerk but this is from last year hes done put a engine in it by now i hope.
andrewmp6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009   #42 (permalink)
jspagna1 is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 197 Threads: 3
 jspagna1's Country Flag  View jspagna1's 14 photos
Northeast   Connecticut
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JS73Droptop View Post
That's just as bad as the SBC powered 71 Duster that ran at Pinks All Out here in Indianapolis back in May.
Oooh that is scary!
__________________
1966 Mustang Coupe
Ford Racing 5.0 HO Motor(Crate)/B303 cam/1.7 RR
TFS TW Heads/Edelbrock Perfor RPM/Holley 650 DP
Mallory Dist/MSD Blaster/Holley Electric Fuel Pump
2.5" Exh H pipe/Flowmasters 40's/Dr.Gas Tailpipes
Lakewood T/A Bars/Aluminum Drive Shaft + loop
Auburn 3.55's/SSBC disc's/C-4 wTCI 2800 stall
Fiberglass hood/trunk/bumpers!(100% Sicilian)
jspagna1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009   #43 (permalink)
Rigger is offline Apprentice


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 61 Threads: 3
 Rigger's Country Flag
Aurora   Colorado
Default

Well now, it seems everybody has pretty much the same opinion. But after just going through and rebuilding my 302 to get 400hp, I have a different opinion. It seems that just about every part I needed to replace I either had to special order, or go looking for it online, or make a part that wasnt quite right work. Where if I had a 350 I could run down to the nearest 7/11 store for a new timing cover for around 15 bucks, instead of having to locate one online for $100. But then again if I was rebuilding a 350 I wouldnt need a new timing cover because it is just that a cover. It doesnt have water pasages in it that corode away and need to be replaced. And if I had a camero or a chavelle, I also wouldnt need to suffer with the original messed up door hinges because they dont make them for my 72 mustang. And I could replace that rusted cowl instead of fabricating a new one for the same reason. To say that the aftermarket has caught up with ford is a complete joke. I could fully understand why a person would want to put a 350 in a mustang. Hell if I had known 3 months ago what I know now, I would have been tempted to do it too. The fact of the matter is that you can get 350 parts all day long at your neighborhood convenience store for almost nothing and here I sit. Still waiting on mail order parts for my 302 because I cant get them locally. But I did get mad enough to put in a GM HEI distributer. There was no way I was going to pay 400 bucks for a decent ford distributer when I could get a gm style for 45 dollars.
Attached Thumbnails
installing-350-chevy-into-1966-mustang-intake.jpg  
Rigger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009   #44 (permalink)
Shnate is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 82 Threads: 12
 Shnate's Country Flag
Ukiah   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 74stang2togo View Post
Well, the main advantage of a Chevy 350 over a Ford 351 Cleveland is that there are a lot more Chevy 350 engines out there than there are Ford 351 Clevelands, therefore there are more parts.

The need to upgrade a 351 Cleveland's oil system for any performance usage would be another factor.


Not saying I think it's a great idea, though I'll admit to having been tempted to try it... and it's opposite (putting the 460 that's in my backyard into my '75 Chevy... seriously not gonna happen, got way too nice of a 400sb in there to consider it, and a fresh and nicely upgraded TH350 tranny.)
So why not a windsor?
Shnate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009   #45 (permalink)
Shnate is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 82 Threads: 12
 Shnate's Country Flag
Ukiah   California
Default

Rigger, i was looking at your picture you posted and I really like the way you did your intake. It's not a supercharger tucked back there somewhere is it? I was just wondering what did you use to connect the intake pipe to the carb?
Shnate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2005 Mustang GT... Installed MAC axle back exhaust mystang68/05 2005+ Talk 10 06-20-2009 11:53 AM
1997 Mustang GT... 70mm throttle body question rbailey1010 4.6L Tech 11 04-08-2009 02:53 PM
2005+ Mustang... What's needed to install daytime running lights? prqwler01 2005+ Mustang GT Tech 9 05-08-2008 12:22 AM
Superchargers for the S197 Mustang GT ... I have some questions Visitor 2005+ Talk 14 10-24-2007 09:36 PM
1997 Mustang GT with Vortech supercharger oiling question Nicks79 4.6L Tech 23 09-27-2007 12:43 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110