what size carburetor for a mild 289? 1966 Mustang - Ford Mustang Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 19 (permalink) Old 04-08-2008 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
1966_mustang's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: springfield
Posts: 1
 
what size carburetor for a mild 289? 1966 Mustang

I have a 1966 ford mustang with a mild 289 and a ford speed.
I have 3:25 rear gears.
I would like to replace the carb with a Barry Grant speed demon 575 with a mechanical secondaries.
would this work or do I need to use vacuum secondaries?
1966_mustang is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 (permalink) Old 04-08-2008
Made Member
 
HPMcGee's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Beachwood
Posts: 406
 
What exactly do you mean when you say mild? I think the Barry grants are still base off a 750 cfm holley. they take them and open them up to flow more cfm. Mine was 850 cfm from a 750 model. That said, if your engine is basically stock, that is going to be too much carb. Especially in double pumper form. Mechanical secondaries pump fuel weather or not the engine needs it, as apposed to vacuum secondaries that actuate and draw only as much fuel as the engine demands. Barry Grants are really for race ready engines. You probably don't want to hear this but, if your 289 is nearly stock, you should be looking at something like an edelbrock 600 afb vacuum secondaries. It is cheap. It will never leak because the body is all one peice (not seperate fuel bowls) and you don't have to tune it because they come pretuned and you really don't have to mess around with it. (I had one of those too) Honestly; A barry Grant carb is how you top off a race motor not start the race motor build.

97 Cobra w/T56, alum DS, SPEC111 clutch, 4:10's, T&J Performance Forged 4v(8.9:1), Manley H-beams, Novi 2000 (21psi w/ 2.7'' pulley) Fast Track A/A I/C, Accufab 1696cfm TB, modified intake, Blow-through meter, Barry Grant Fuel syst., longtubes and H-pipe, 40 Flows, MSD ignition, Detroit True Track, 315 NT01's on 17 x 11's, 640 RWHP.
HPMcGee is offline  
post #3 of 19 (permalink) Old 04-08-2008
MACH I Member
S197 Member
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Amherst
Posts: 2,635
 
I ran a spread bore 450 Holley on a stock block 302 and had happy results with it. Vacuum secondaries would be better for you with what you have now.
Dave

2015 Stage 3 Roush
'66' Ranchero w/almost done 302 T-5 swap
2000 4x4 Ranger
2003 4x2 Ranger
'69' Fairlane Cobra, 428 4-speed waiting for work
Dave is online now  
post #4 of 19 (permalink) Old 04-09-2008
Apprentice
Classic Member
 
Montana's Stang's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Crowley
Posts: 131
 
It depends on what you mean by mild but I would not go any bigger than a 600cfm regardless of brand. A 289/302 just doesn't need anything bigger unless it is a long way on the strip only side (and I mean WAY hopped up). It just can't use the amount of fuel flowed by anything bigger. Past 600 cfm you will have nothing but problems in my experience. You certainly don't need anything that is a double pumper. More gas only means more power if you can flow the air to use it and the exhaust to get rid of it after it's done it's work.

Pat Montana

1968 Coupe, 302CID, TopLoader 4-Speed,
.411 9 in. POSI...

WORK IN PROGRESS!!

myspace.com/montanasmustang68
Montana's Stang is offline  
post #5 of 19 (permalink) Old 04-10-2008
Rookie
Classic Member
 
Erwin's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 27
 
I have a 65 with a mild 289 and auto trans. I'm running a Holley 570 Street Avenger as suggested by the engine shop. You can change the springs on it for power vs. economy. The engine is still rather new and I haven't really opened it up yet (less than 100 miles). My understanding is to stay under 600cfm for less than 300hp on the 289 (per Holley web site).

Holley Performance Products 570 CFM Four Barrel Carburetor*0-80570


How do you like the 3:25 rear? I'm thinking of adding a limited slip 3:25. I think I have 2:80 to 1.
Erwin is offline  
post #6 of 19 (permalink) Old 04-10-2008
Made Member
Classic Member
 
shagadoodle's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 394
 
some where someone told me that you don't have a big hp difference in 550 cfm and the 650 cfm
shagadoodle is offline  
post #7 of 19 (permalink) Old 04-10-2008
Apprentice
 
middlebay's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 60
 
Shag,

Check out this link. Jon, seems very knowledgeable about carbs. He's advising me on my update.

Carburetor, Carburetors, Carbs, Carb Parts. Pony Carburetors - Your Ford Carburetor Restoration and Part Sales Specialist

He's got great info on his site.

1968 Coupe, 289 2bl, 3spd, Medium Quasar Blue- fire damaged in April 2007
middlebay is offline  
post #8 of 19 (permalink) Old 04-11-2008
Rookie
 
MARKMARTIN's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 37
 
I have a pretty much stock 302 roller in my car and I use the Edelbrock #1406 - 600cfm. It works great! No powervalve to blow out like the holley.
MARKMARTIN is offline  
post #9 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-23-2009
Rookie
 
garrardao's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 2
 
I've got a 68 mustang with a 289 and i am thinking about putting an edelbrock carburetor on it but in not sure which one to use, can anyone tell me what the difference is between the 1405 and the 1406? And maybe which one they would recommend that i should use! I would appreciate it!
garrardao is offline  
Made Member
 
Gary 69 mach I's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: muskogee
Posts: 446
 
I was having trouble choosing a carb for my 351c.I decided on the holley 670 street avenger duel feed, ele choke ,vac sec.OOOhhh man i love it.I did have a holley 600 on it.For your 289 the holley 570 may be a good choice.Mine came with a 2hr video on how to tune,trouble shoot,ect..Check it out.
Gary 69 mach I is offline  
Rookie
 
garrardao's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 2
 
Hey thanks! I'll take a look at them!
garrardao is offline  
GT Member
 
mccance's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: atlantic
Posts: 1,299
 
actually barry grant makes a great carbureter and will set it up for your engine. when I bought mine I called barry grant directly they asked for all my engine specs including the altitude where I live and sent the carb out I bolted it on and it was perfect. and btw it is not a rebuilt holley. they look similar but are a completely new casting with smoother bores and numerous other differences. the real question here is why do you want mechanical secondaries and the barry grant carb in the first place. are you looking for more horsepower? are you looking for a better looking carb?

why exactly are you looking for a new carb because for a mild 289 you will be hard pressed to beat the original autolite carb that was on it from the factory.

65 mustang. supercharged 302 currie 9 inch, 5 speed.

67 mustang built for my daughter

89 convertible lx in progress

click on the house icon to see my garage page with build info.
mccance is offline  
Made Member
Classic Member
5.0L Member
 
steve sturgin's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 389
 
hi garrardao,

The differenc between the 1405 and the 1406 is the 1406 is electric choke and the '05 is manual choke.

I have the 05 and it is all good.

Steve

1966 Fastback
steve sturgin is offline  
PONY Member
Classic Member
 
Little Mule's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Williamsburg
Posts: 395
 
I have a slightly modified 289 in my 67 and I tried a vacuum 600 holley and a electric 650 edelbrock double pump. I got lucky in the fact that the guys who have been helping me plan out my mods at the speed shop and parts store had spare carbs they let me try running on the car before I bought.
Really liked the performance on the 650 more so than the 600. I've been told a few times that I'm waisting extra gas, but I'm still happier with it.

Mods are edelbrock performer intake, comp cams camshaft (can't remember the specs right now) - kept it street size though, new lifters and double valve springs to match the cam. Alum. rockers, long hooker headers, dual flowmaster series 40 exhaust and and MDS ignition system. I'm also going to add an X-pipe to the exhaust. Had a valve job done on it as well.

Never dyno'd it, but I might once I finish the work and am actually home long enough to do so.

Kris
Little Mule is offline  
Apprentice
Classic Member
 
tbunker's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Dartmouth
Posts: 230
 
Definitely for a 289 driver you are going to want to stay below 600cfm. When you get too big of a carb on an engine you can experience hesitation and flat spots.

Also, try and stay away from Pony Carburetors. They are nothing but a headache/waste of money for myself and several others.

65 Mustang 289 C4. Edelbrock 600cfm (no more Pony Carb Autolite), Shorty Headers with 2 1/2" collector & glasspacks, Shiftkit, 5-leaf stock height rear springs, 620lbs/1" drop front springs, Gas Adjust shocks, 14x7 American Racing S200 Daisy Rims, low-mid range cam, 1 1/8" front sway bar & 3/4" rear sway bar, & ~3.80's (I think) in the rear.
tbunker is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Random Question

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183