AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 03-17-2009   #1 (permalink)
Hondo78 is offline Rookie


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 17 Threads: 3
 Hondo78's Country Flag
Palo Alto   California
Cool 289 Rebuild- or 347 stroker?

I am looking for opinion on the rebuild of my 1965 -289, from someone who has driven both the stroker version and 10:1 289 version.

What is the seat of the pants gain? (Drive-ablility)

Was it worth the time, and Dollars. $1200 seems cheap for the stroker kit all balanced and forged.

Were both engines balanced well?
Hondo78 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009   #2 (permalink)
Jonk67 is offline Made Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 629 Threads: 10
 Jonk67's Country Flag  View Jonk67's 1 photo
Smyrna   Tennessee
Default

There are a lot of factors there, what heads will you use? This is where the ford engines suffer, the stock heads are very restrictive. Will the stroker be a roller motor? You're adding 50+ cubes so of course there's going to be a HP/TQ advantage, it's the additional parts that will decide how much= heads, cam, intake, carb, headers, etc.
I haven't driven both but my stock 200Hp 289 wasn't keeping me happy anymore so I pulled it and had it stroked to 331 and should have it back in within a month I hope. Added AFR 165 heads, cam, etc. to match. Hope to jump from 200hp to 325-350, I know I'll feel that seat of the pants.
I looked at going 347 but with the 289 it was too close to max rod angle for me, it's a DD that'll see some track fun so I didn't need to max out in my mind. Many have gone 347 with 302 based rollers w/o problem due to new piston kits that are improved.
Unless you're pushing the engine for power or using a blower/turbo, etc. the forged parts aren't necessary, cast will hold up fine. Fordged is also a little heavier for all the reciprocating parts.
Jon
__________________
'67 Coupe 289 C4, Candyapple red w/red deluxe int., PS, ext. decor group, light group, foxbody seats.
Next to install> stroked 333, AOD, 9" w/3.50:1, PDB.
'09 Black Warriors In Pink with glass roof - the wifes Mustang.
"If it ain't broke, I haven't fixed it yet" -Jon
Jonk67 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009   #3 (permalink)
Hondo78 is offline Rookie


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 17 Threads: 3
 Hondo78's Country Flag
Palo Alto   California
Cool 347 stroker

I have done some reading on the subject, I see some areas that can cause issues, just wondering if the change is worth the effort.

I am attempting to keep this car with the look of perod correctness, less of course the brakes and rolling stock.

With my heads the 347 makes 11:1 compression, not a problem really, but I would like to drive it to summer events.

Let me know how yours drives in normal conditions not just at WOT, I had issues with the car chattering when letting the clutch out from a start. (I rememeber this from the 70's the body flexing too much) I want to know if the extra torque makes normal to spirited lauches less shakey.
Hondo78 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009   #4 (permalink)
72 fastback is offline Apprentice


Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 92 Threads: 9
 72 fastback's Country Flag
hamden ct 06514   Connecticut
Default

If ypur car waas chattering from a start it was probally a pilot bushing isssue or a belll housing mis-alignment.
72 fastback is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a stroker kit for the 289 Block? geo65 Classic Tech 8 05-21-2009 01:50 PM
342 stroker or 347 stroker Black Lightning 5.0L Talk 17 01-11-2009 08:20 PM
Stroker Kit, Or Regular Engine Rebuild Kit What's The Difference? generationGT 5.0L Tech 8 10-18-2008 10:43 PM
Cams for 347 stroker bmw5002 Classic Tech 2 04-28-2008 04:04 AM
347 Stroker Horse Power? Hemlock 5.0L Tech 5 01-22-2007 11:29 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112