390 FE or FT in a 1967? - Ford Mustang Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 12 (permalink) Old 03-19-2009 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
JoeKramer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Bremerton
Posts: 3
 
390 FE or FT in a 1967?

I have a 390 out of a '72 truck and they are referred to as an FT (ford-truck, meant for trucks).
Are they basically the same as an FE (ford-edsel, meant for cars) motor?
Will the FT fit in the 67 Mustang like the FE?

Anyone know that the differences are?
JoeKramer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 12 (permalink) Old 03-19-2009
Apprentice
Classic Member
 
kens67mustang's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: none
Posts: 237
 
ALL 390's are FE's. the 360's and others are known as FTs.and the 390 will fit in a '67...........................since they were optioned w/ the 390..just need the right motor mounts,etc.
kens67mustang is offline  
post #3 of 12 (permalink) Old 03-19-2009
Apprentice
Classic Member
 
cody browning's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Myrtle Beach
Posts: 88
 
yep i have a 64 t-bird with a 390 and i have never heard them referred to as ft's and i have seen a couple stangs with the 390... personally i love my 289 waaaaaaaay better than that big old 390 but if you want big cubes and you have the block then go for it cause i know they fit
cody browning is offline  
post #4 of 12 (permalink) Old 03-20-2009
Rookie
5.0L Member
 
Mgino757's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 41
 
FT's are good for low speed applications like trucks. If I were you and I had a choice, I'd go with an FE 390. FE's were made for passenger cars and definitely more suitable for a Mustang. There is worlds difference in performance. There are no aftermarket parts for the FT. Parts are not interchangeable between FT's and FE's. FT's are low compression, low performance motors. They towed stuff pretty good though. A '72 FT is all done by 3800 RPM. To answer your question, yes it will fit, but the performance will suck, to say the least. One book I recommend you reading to learn more about the difference between an FT and FE is How To Rebuild Big Block Ford Engines by Steve Christ. Very good book. You can buy it for less than $20 on Amazon.com.

1985 Mustang GT conv. underdrive pulleys, equal length headers, true dual exhaust, 3.55:1 8.8'' rear end. 235,000+ miles. Running with 17 degrees of initial timing.

1996 Thunderbird LX stock 4.6L V8. MAC cold air. 225/60/15 BFG g-Force Sport V-rated. J-moded 4r70W. 172 rwhp 240 rwtq

Last edited by Mgino757; 03-20-2009 at 01:15 AM. Reason: more details......
Mgino757 is offline  
post #5 of 12 (permalink) Old 03-20-2009
Rookie
5.0L Member
 
Mgino757's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 41
 
By the time you modify the FT to perform worth a crap, you could have bought two FE's.

1985 Mustang GT conv. underdrive pulleys, equal length headers, true dual exhaust, 3.55:1 8.8'' rear end. 235,000+ miles. Running with 17 degrees of initial timing.

1996 Thunderbird LX stock 4.6L V8. MAC cold air. 225/60/15 BFG g-Force Sport V-rated. J-moded 4r70W. 172 rwhp 240 rwtq
Mgino757 is offline  
post #6 of 12 (permalink) Old 03-20-2009
MACH I Member
Classic Member
5.0L Member
 
The Greek's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 3,184
 
There is one issue that I'd like to mention. The exhaust manifold bolt pattern is different on the non-Mustang 390 FE and FTs. You will have to have the heads with the correct bolt pattern to install the exhaust manifolds or headers that fit the Mustang. This may apply to the FEs that went into the Fairlane and Comets, too.

I'm not sure of this, but I believe that the heads can't be modified to accept the Mustang manifolds because the casting doesn't have enough material to drill and tap the bolt holes for them.
The Greek is offline  
post #7 of 12 (permalink) Old 03-20-2009
Rookie
5.0L Member
 
Mgino757's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 41
 
I believe Edelbrock's FE heads have both bolt patterns drilled. The Fairlane and the Mustang of the same year are pretty much the same car. The only thing that is different between the two is the interior and the sheet metal.

1985 Mustang GT conv. underdrive pulleys, equal length headers, true dual exhaust, 3.55:1 8.8'' rear end. 235,000+ miles. Running with 17 degrees of initial timing.

1996 Thunderbird LX stock 4.6L V8. MAC cold air. 225/60/15 BFG g-Force Sport V-rated. J-moded 4r70W. 172 rwhp 240 rwtq
Mgino757 is offline  
post #8 of 12 (permalink) Old 03-20-2009 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
JoeKramer's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Bremerton
Posts: 3
 
How can you tell the difference from an FE and FT?
JoeKramer is offline  
post #9 of 12 (permalink) Old 03-20-2009
Made Member
 
gtjoe's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
 
The FE family consists of the following engines: 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428.

Being part of the same family, their parts are interchangeable. To make ANY engine perform, you need quality parts; crank, rods, pistons, cam, heads, intake...

Your FT engine block will fit in your Mustang. To get it to perform, you will need better heads, cam, intake, and carb for your application. The block has nothing to do with how the overall engine performs other than how much power it can handle.
gtjoe is offline  
Made Member
 
gtjoe's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 386
 
To clarify a bit, I also think there were 331, 361, and 391 versions but I am not for sure. There are some differences in crankshafts and journals as well as flywheels, balancers, and how the engine was balanced (internally vs. externally). I think the FT engines had desireable cranks if memory serves me, they were built for longevity.

If you are just wanting to get this motor, drop it in and drive away, you'd be better off finding an FE out of a passenger car. If you are planning on rebuilding it, you should be ok, just be sure to get the heads with the proper bolt pattern for the exhaust.
gtjoe is offline  
Rookie
5.0L Member
 
Mgino757's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 41
 
The crank from a FT will need to be machined to fit in a FE.

1985 Mustang GT conv. underdrive pulleys, equal length headers, true dual exhaust, 3.55:1 8.8'' rear end. 235,000+ miles. Running with 17 degrees of initial timing.

1996 Thunderbird LX stock 4.6L V8. MAC cold air. 225/60/15 BFG g-Force Sport V-rated. J-moded 4r70W. 172 rwhp 240 rwtq
Mgino757 is offline  
PONY Member
Classic Member
 
Putt's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Colville
Posts: 353
 
Is the engine out of a F100-F350? Or a larger truck F450 on up? The larger trucks used the FT, but pickups used the same FE engine as the passenger cars. Check the casting numbers on the block to be sure.

1965 Mustang 351W 4bl AT(Older brothers-I built it)
1965 Mustang 289 4bl AT(Mom's joy-I fix/upgrade it!)
1966 F100 428FE 4bl 4sp and 3sp MT
Putt is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182