AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 03-25-2009   #1 (permalink)
67Fastback35 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 8 Threads: 7
 67Fastback35's Country Flag  View 67Fastback35's 1 classified ad
Vancouver   British Columbia
Default Can I use the same flywheel on a 289 for a 351W?

Does anyone know if I can use the same flywheel on a 289 for a 351W? Is the bolt pattern on the crankshaft the same for these two motors?
67Fastback35 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2009   #2 (permalink)
curtisboyte is offline Rookie


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19 Threads: 5
 curtisboyte's Country Flag
mendenhall   Mississippi
Default

I would like to know also.
curtisboyte is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009   #3 (permalink)
rj8806 is offline Senior Member

4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,918 Threads: 95
 rj8806's Country Flag  View rj8806's 16 photos  View rj8806's HomePage
Knoxville   Tennessee
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67Fastback35 View Post
Does anyone know if I can use the same flywheel on a 289 for a 351W? Is the bolt pattern on the crankshaft the same for these two motors?

As long as they are both from the same era, i.e...both from the '60' - '70's where they were all 28oz counter balance weighted flywheels. The bolt patterns are the same from this era. I believe this changed in '79 when the fox body platform came out and they started calling the 302 a 5.0. The 5.0 went to a 50oz counter balance. They are not interchangeable.





Richard
Tech Support
Tremec TKO, T45 & T56 Transmission Systems
__________________
Self Proclaimed "Resident Manual Tranny/Driveline Guru"

Go with PI heads and quit watching The Fast and the Furious. (thanks 2 IhaveadopeGT)

Remember, it is almost impossible for anyone, myself included, to diagnose a problem over the internet without seeing the car. My advice is simply that, advice based on years of experience. I don't want you or anyone taking my word as gospel. I am trying to give some direction as to what I think may be happening.
rj8806 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009   #4 (permalink)
The Greek is offline Senior Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,537 Threads: 0
 The Greek's Country Flag
Jacksonville   Florida
Default

All 289s and 351s are counterbalanced at 28 ounces and the flywheels are interchangeable as long as their diameter is the same. If the diameter is different you will have starter placement problems.

The 5.0 HO engines have a different balance factor of 50 oz. and their flywheels will bolt up to the 28 oz. engines, but the engine will develop a destructive vibration. This balance factor started with the 1982 and later 5.0 HO only. The same holds true for the harmonic balancers.
The Greek is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009   #5 (permalink)
sparx is offline Apprentice


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 110 Threads: 23
 sparx's Country Flag  View sparx's 1 classified ad
tucson   Arizona
Default

I have this question also. I had a 289 with c4 in my car, now I am building on a later 302 block that has roller cam provisions.

I was told the harmonic balancer has to be changed from 28 ounce to 50.

What about the flywheel? Does it need to be a 50 ounce? I believe the one I removed from the 289 is 23 oz.

And is there any difference between auto and standard trans regarding the required flywheel? I see many 50 ounce flywheels for clutch provision on Ebay but none for auto.

sparx
__________________
66 Coupe
Replacing 289 w/ 302
C4 Automatic
Restore with mods in process
sparx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009   #6 (permalink)
66 restomod is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 427 Threads: 12
 66 restomod's Country Flag  View 66 restomod's HomePage
Benicia   California
Default

You must match the flywheel to the harmonic balancer of your engine or will vibrate itself to death in short order.
rj8806 is correct with his information.
I changed out my flywheel on the 289 when I did the T5 conversion to the 5.0 version so I could run a 10.5 inch clutch. The flywheel was a Zoom Flywheel and it was for a 289, 302 or 351 and came with bolt on weights for making it a 28 or 50 oz imbalance. I used the 28 oz weight on the 289.

To answer the original question: Yes the 289 with a 28 oz will fit a 351 and work. All 351 engines had a 28 oz imbalance

Good Luck and Be Safe
Ron
Christophers 66 Mustang Restoration and Modification
__________________
A code 66 coupe
289 4v, Roller Rockers, Electric fan
Performer & 650 Edelbrock
MSD ignition
Tri Y into 2.25 Shelby side exhaust
T5 conversion & Hydraulic clutch
CSRP Discs
66 restomod is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009   #7 (permalink)
sparx is offline Apprentice


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 110 Threads: 23
 sparx's Country Flag  View sparx's 1 classified ad
tucson   Arizona
Default

thanks!
How does the flywheel index? The harmonic balancer has a keyway to index, none on flywheel?
sparx
__________________
66 Coupe
Replacing 289 w/ 302
C4 Automatic
Restore with mods in process
sparx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009   #8 (permalink)
66 restomod is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 427 Threads: 12
 66 restomod's Country Flag  View 66 restomod's HomePage
Benicia   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sparx View Post
thanks!
How does the flywheel index? The harmonic balancer has a keyway to index, none on flywheel?
sparx
The holes on the flywheel look like they are the same distance but they are not. It will bolt up only 1 way.

Good Luck and Be Safe
Ron
Christophers 66 Mustang Restoration and Modification
__________________
A code 66 coupe
289 4v, Roller Rockers, Electric fan
Performer & 650 Edelbrock
MSD ignition
Tri Y into 2.25 Shelby side exhaust
T5 conversion & Hydraulic clutch
CSRP Discs
66 restomod is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009   #9 (permalink)
sparx is offline Apprentice


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 110 Threads: 23
 sparx's Country Flag  View sparx's 1 classified ad
tucson   Arizona
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66 restomod View Post
The holes on the flywheel look like they are the same distance but they are not. It will bolt up only 1 way.

Good Luck and Be Safe
Ron
Christophers 66 Mustang Restoration and Modification
Ok you are speaking of the spacing then...
jim
__________________
66 Coupe
Replacing 289 w/ 302
C4 Automatic
Restore with mods in process
sparx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
289, 351w, flywheel



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
289 to 351W questions 68stroker Classic Tech 2 02-08-2009 04:05 PM
351 into a 1995 Mustang Dyne2002 94-95 Tech 9 10-20-2008 01:12 PM
witch heads are better 351W GT-40 GT-40P or 289 heads 5.0kid 94-95 Tech 19 02-03-2008 03:01 AM
1965 Mustang Coupe - 289 to 351w swap DeathClock Classic Tech 4 10-31-2007 12:34 AM
351w Heads On A 289 289er Classic Tech 1 03-26-2005 04:46 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112