AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 03-31-2009   #1 (permalink)
chrisgrimes2186 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5 Threads: 4
 chrisgrimes2186's Country Flag
Coats   North Carolina
Default 289 engine

I have a 289 that I am rebuilding. How can i rebuild this to have 300+ hp. Assuming that I only bore it 30 over. Thanks for the help.
chrisgrimes2186 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009   #2 (permalink)
2Manystangs is offline Made Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,289 Threads: 9
 2Manystangs's Country Flag
Tampa   Florida
Default

The heads are probably the best way, go with some Trick Flow aluminums or similar...then get a good cam and headers and you should easily be over 300...I'd recommend paying extra for forged pistons...good life insurance for the motor
__________________
"Goose, Hollywood's fine, I want Viper"

1995 Mustang GT Cnv 347(427 stroker being built!) almost done!
1996 Cobra with Kenne Bell 2.1 Supercharger and every other conceivable part you can bolt on it...650hp upgrade in the works
2003 Infiniti M45 V8 340 hp...a methadone treatment for reformed Mustang drivers
2Manystangs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009   #3 (permalink)
65BlueHorse is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 459 Threads: 15
 65BlueHorse's Country Flag  View 65BlueHorse's 12 photos
Bedford   Pennsylvania
Default

I agree with 2Manystangs. A cam, heads, and headers should really boost power don't forget about the intake and carb also. If you are replacing the crank and pistons then you may want to get a stroker kit for it.
65BlueHorse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009   #4 (permalink)
black02GT is offline Apprentice

4.6L Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 188 Threads: 7
 black02GT's Country Flag  View black02GT's 2 photos
Clarksville   Ohio
Send a message via AIM to black02GT
Default

my opinion the best way to go would be cams, heads, rods, pitons, and crank. it would produce more hp and make the engine a lot better as a whole.
__________________
2002 Mustang GT
-Xcalliber 2 Programmer
-BBK cold air intake
-Steeda short throw shifter
-Flowmaster 40's
-O/R H-pipe
-Dual Friction Centerforce clutch
black02GT is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009   #5 (permalink)
PaulS is offline Made Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 311 Threads: 1
 PaulS's Country Flag
Seattle   Washington
Default

You can spend the money on heads and have a lot more potential that with the stock heads but remember that the Shelby 300+HP engine used stock heads and valve sizes. Cleaning up the valve pockets and gasket matching the ports will provide you with a low cost ability to get 350 HP. The cam specs for the Shelby cam are still available and there are cams that can make more HP today. Forged pistons are good insurance if you are going to turn in excess of 6000 rpm. There are ARP rod bolts that are between the 5/16 and 3/8" sizes normally used - they are 11/32" and very good insurance for the bottom end up to about 7200 RPM. I would recommend 10:1 compression if you are going to run gas and 12 or 13:1 if you will be running E85. Select a cam that will get peak power at the speed (RPM) that you will be turning your engine. Remember that RPM above 7200 will require new rods and a stronger crank than stock. You will need an intake manifold that flows at the same RPM as the rest of your equipment. The engine is a system - All the parts have to work together to make it work well.
__________________
Paul's Street and Strip
Performance AODs & C4s
paulstephens @ q . com
6522 51 Ave. S.
Seattle, WA. 98118
206.725.0881
PaulS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009   #6 (permalink)
chrisgrimes2186 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5 Threads: 4
 chrisgrimes2186's Country Flag
Coats   North Carolina
Default

Thank you for all the help but im still a rookie at everything...For example what are the specifics on the Heads-what cc, angle, intake and exhaust or would it be just as good to port and polish the existing heads. I want roller everything but what size on the rockers or should the lifters be mechanical or hydraulic rollers. And for the cam what should be the lift or duration or RPM range and again am I looking for a hydraulic or mechanical roller cam. I just have so many questions like that, is there something that I can read or can someone give me advice. Thanks
chrisgrimes2186 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009   #7 (permalink)
65BlueHorse is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 459 Threads: 15
 65BlueHorse's Country Flag  View 65BlueHorse's 12 photos
Bedford   Pennsylvania
Default

The answer to most of those questions depend on how you are going to use the car and how much you want to spend. Without a stroker kit you will want heads with 58cc chambers to keep it as close to original compression as possible. Geting the stock heads ported and polished is an option but you probably would be much better off with aftermarket alum. heads for what you want. I just have a flat tappet cam so i can't help much with the roller question but roller is the way to go for the best performance. For the cam if the car is going to be driven a good bit you don't want anything to radical. something around .5 lift should be good. Also if it is being built as a street car not as a race car you probably want the top rpm around 5,500-6,000 range.
65BlueHorse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009   #8 (permalink)
65BlueHorse is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 459 Threads: 15
 65BlueHorse's Country Flag  View 65BlueHorse's 12 photos
Bedford   Pennsylvania
Default

Sorry, I forgot to put this in the last post. If you want to get a book on rebuilding a 289 i bought How to Rebuild the Small-Block Ford, by George Reid. It is a pretty helpful book. The price on the book is $20 but i got it on amazon a lot cheaper.
65BlueHorse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009   #9 (permalink)
axman61 is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 65 Threads: 17
 axman61's Country Flag  View axman61's 9 photos
Temple   Georgia
Default

The suggestion on the ARP bolts is right on! To make 300hp with a 289 takes RPM and RPM takes $$$. But I will say this also: drive a Stang that is putting 250 ponies to the ground and you will feel like you've got 400.
axman61 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to gain the most HP without boreing engine on a 1964 1/2 mustang 289? gtman08 Classic Tech 5 09-06-2008 07:46 AM
289 Clevor engine gotstang66 Classic Tech 3 05-31-2008 11:04 PM
Rebuild stock 289 2v engine. What would it cost? Mustangdreamer Classic Tech 5 03-06-2007 08:50 AM
Interesting (I think) reflection re: 3.8L and new Hurricane engine. kscoyote Mustang Lounge 11 01-25-2007 11:30 AM
Accessory and mods websites mrvandermey 2005-2009 Mustang Talk 9 12-17-2005 12:11 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112