Modern Motor in a 65 Mustang - Ford Mustang Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
toofun's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Middleton
Posts: 38
 
Modern Motor in a 65 Mustang

Well like everyone else in the world, I am looking into options for a newer motor in my 65 Mustang. Only problem is, it seems that every combination I am looking at seems to be a HUGE hassle due to the fact that the modular motors are W I D E ! Who out there has done this and what is the best option to go with to get Modern performance at minimal hassle and what is a general overall cost to it? Also, the power numbers on many of the Ford modular motors seem to be lacking compared to the Chevy LS motors. Has anyone done a swap with a chevy ls motor in one of these 65's?
toofun is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009
Rookie
Classic Member
 
NY65Fastback's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Stormville
Posts: 11
 
Not sure about chevy motors in a mustang but if you're looking for lots of engine compartment space for a modular motor, look into the coilover conversions that eliminate the shock towers.
I got this one for mine (just a skinny 5.0 engine though)
++ Total Cost Involved Engineering, Inc. 64 1/2 - 70 Ford Mustang Front End ++

93 Supercharged 5.0 stang Coupe 5spd -- SOLD
65 Fastback 2+2 -- Current project
NY65Fastback is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009
Rookie
Classic Member
 
1965 pony's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: St. Clair
Posts: 17
 
Why not look into swapping in a 5.0 fuel injected. The options are endless, they look nice, and the same mounts, and front suspension can be retained for future, if you change your mind. The chevy LS engine would be great in an old Camaro, but if pushrod V8 is alright, then the 5.0 is the way to go, besides if you want power, either engine makes as much as your wallet allows. A gentleman where I used to live in Bowling Green, had a 5.0 in his 1995 Mustang putting 1300 horsepower down to the pavement when the car would hook up. He had fuel injection with a ported edelbrock intake, Trick Flow heads, and twin turbos. Very cool set-up, and could drive it on the street.
1965 pony is offline  
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009
Apprentice
 
stangtjk's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Morgantown
Posts: 148
 
Send a message via AIM to stangtjk
I've seen a couple of mustangs running LS motors. I don't see why so many ppl get their panties in a twist about that type of swap. Who really cares what manufacturer produced the engine, if you want to use it use it. After rebuilding a ford motor with aftermarket heads, cams, intake ect. its not really a ford engine anymore anyway. The advantage to the LS motors are pretty obvious. They are everywhere, make a lot of power right out of the box, are fairly inexpensive and you wouldn't have to rebuild the whole front of the car to put it in. I put the 4.6 DOHC in my 68 because if found a mark viii for cheap but I would have had no problem using an LS engine if I would have found a cheap donor car.

68 Coupe frame off restomod. 4.6 DOHC, IRS, Air suspension......... If a 96 Mark VIII had it so will the mustang.
stangtjk is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009
PONY Member
 
Calponycarsmike's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Non
Posts: 895
 
I agree swap what you have I am putting a Zetec in a classic Fiat, why because I found it cheap and I know how to work on it. That and it is 2x the HP.
Calponycarsmike is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old 05-05-2009
Top Dog
 
andrewmp6's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Louisville
Posts: 5,991
 
Remember a chevy 350 or ls1 is about the size of a 351w.If you don't mind making your own motor any tranny mounts go for.You can get some of the truck engines cheap swap to the car intake for hood clearance.Watch this show Horsepower they take a junkyard lq4 the 6.0 and make some big power cheaply.There is a early camaro with a ford 302 in it,Its your car put whatever engine you want and can afford.
andrewmp6 is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old 05-06-2009 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
toofun's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Middleton
Posts: 38
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmp6 View Post
Remember a chevy 350 or ls1 is about the size of a 351w.If you don't mind making your own motor any tranny mounts go for.You can get some of the truck engines cheap swap to the car intake for hood clearance.Watch this show Horsepower they take a junkyard lq4 the 6.0 and make some big power cheaply.There is a early camaro with a ford 302 in it,Its your car put whatever engine you want and can afford.
Yea I am a chevy guy and have had about 12 69 camaros. Mostly convertibles! I always have been very impressed with the LQ4 motors. You can get them very cheap! COMPLETE from the junkyard with less than 100k on them, do the intake swap and make some serious power! There was a guy on a camaro site that put a setup together for a total of $1400(Motor and upgrades) and made just shy of 400 HP and 400 TQ That is just sick considering that you can run these engines to over 200k miles without a glitch! The 65 mustang is very light! Putting 400hp/400tq should make that puppy fly no matter what combo I put in it.

Mark
TOOFUN
toofun is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old 05-23-2009
Rookie
 
Sixpack's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Bismarck
Posts: 12
 
I work for a custom car shop and our main feature is putting modern motors into classic cars. Like someone else already said, use a Mustang II front end with coilovers, and get rid of the shock towers. Anything will fit in there. We try to stick Ford with Ford and Chevy with Chevy, but customers always have other ideas and we have done some pretty outrageous combinations. The 5.0 is a pretty nice engine and even the later model 4.6 work well too. You'd be surprised what will fit in those engine bays. All our cars usually have Power Steering, and A/C. Another option is the aluminum Buick V8 215. A smaller V8 but can be built pretty tough. That is what I have in one of my cars and there is HUGE amounts of room in the bay.
Sixpack is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old 05-24-2009
Top Dog
 
andrewmp6's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Louisville
Posts: 5,991
 
I love most all older cars but i hate the mod motor after being a tech at all state ford here.I love the ls engines they are cheap to get no dizzy helps in tight places and they fit in just about any car out there.
andrewmp6 is offline  
Apprentice
Classic Member
 
kens67mustang's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: none
Posts: 237
 
Because a CLASSIC car deserves a classic motor...Not a hackjob to install a non ford engine into a Ford like a Mustang.
kens67mustang is offline  
GT Member
Classic Member
5.0L Member
 
v8only's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Thompson
Posts: 1,241
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kens67mustang View Post
Because a CLASSIC car deserves a classic motor...Not a hackjob to install a non ford engine into a Ford like a Mustang.

that's complete rubbish. While I agree mating cars with their proper brand engines...I do not like classic powertrains

Restomod is the way to go nowadays. There was NOTHING fun about driving a vintage classic with all it's vintage hardware...archaic ride, lack of power and lack of safety equipment.

Updating a classic with modern drivetrains and safety equipement is the way to breath life into an otherwise very boring riding classic vehicle.

I myself don't like the modular motors. Unless you get an 03/04 supercharged cobra motor, they simply don't make enough power to warrant the cost.

a late 96-01 5.0 explorer roller motor with make 300 at the flywheel all day long as a stock bolt in with a good intake/carb and exhaust.

Jeremy

-86 ssp X chp 5.0 coupe
-66 coupe,Ford racing crate 5.0 roller engine, t5 trans, 8.8 explorer 373 rear,2005 mustang front disc conversion, lots more
-1972 Maverick undergoing full resto
-1998 Lincoln Mark Viii LSC Black/Black
v8only is offline  
Apprentice
Classic Member
 
66mustang86's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2009
Location: Elk Grove
Posts: 127
 
I don't want to see a chevy in a mustang any more than the next guy but as others have said before "its your car do what you want with it" as far as the swap goes I don't see a whole lot of cost effectiveness in swapping over to chevy. All that time and work to fit the motor mounts and tranny when you could have spent all that money making a bad ass 5.0 making more power.
66mustang86 is offline  
Top Dog
 
andrewmp6's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Location: Louisville
Posts: 5,991
 
The reasons i hate the motor mod are blow by the egr on them is junk.And to do anything to it you gonna pull the engine.My brothers 01 crown vic had a bent valve on the right bank took me 4 days to get the engine out head rebuilt and put back.Been a small block just yank the head with it still in the car.
andrewmp6 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183