After just reading this...
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...b-4b-carb.html and the info that Veronica gave..."Hello.

Don't feel bad. Many, many people think that a bigger carb is automatically better. I ran a little hands-on test on a K code that I used to have. I put a 600cfm Holley on it and drove it around, flogged it, etc... for a while, and then I put a 480cfm Autolite carb on it and didn't change anything else, and it ran better with the 480. I realize that 'runs better' is kind of vague, so, to dial that in a little better, the car was quicker off the line, more responsive, and got better gas mileage. It ran just fine with 600, but, it was almost like efi with the 480 as far as throttle response."
I am seriously wondering if all of this talk about me finding the right cam and/or heads is all a waste of time and money.(if it is, i seriously appologize to all who spent time fooling around with an issue that is my own fault) The first thing i did when i got that car was put a bigger carb and matching intake manifold on it. Now, i am worried i wasted money and its the reason im not happy with my performance. I am using a Performer 600cfm carb with basicaly a stock 2v engine aside form mods listed in my signature below. Perhaps a 500cfm Performer would have been better and i would get more performance out of it? But now with wanting a performance cam is what i have ok or should i have still went with a 500cfm instead? oh man...
__________________
'66 Fastback 289/c4: Edelbrock Performer 600cfm carb, 1" spacer and intake manifold, Pertronix ignition, Tri-y headers, Grab-a-trak suspension, dual 2" exhaust, B&M Shift Kit, Trac-Lock rear.