AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 07-04-2009   #1 (permalink)
irish350 is offline Rookie


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4 Threads: 1
 irish350's Country Flag
Tempe/Phoenix   Arizona
Question 1965 Mustang coupe fuel injected 305 fitment issues

So, as the title says, ive got a 65 that im in the process of switching from an incomplete carbed setup over to an injected setup. My first issue, is that the headers that i was sold with the car (bbk shorties) dont fit, so pending further research i decided to start with the induction side of the car first. After conferring with a local shop that i trust, i decided to go with a trickflow trackheat setup. Today i went to go make sure it'd clear the hood, and i got stopped because the upper intake doesnt clear the strut tower brace..

i feel like either this car was supposed to get lowered mounts when it got the 5.0, or i just have to replace these parts with stuff specific to this swap?

maybe i just need a couple helpful links or something.. haha

any help is appreciated
irish350 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009   #2 (permalink)
gcroix is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 216 Threads: 28
 gcroix's Country Flag
Stockbridge   Georgia
Default

If it is a 5.0 block into a stock 65, you can use headers for a 289. 5.0 headers/exh manifolds, in my experience with 5.0L into a 66, will not fit, as they go too far 'out' before they turn down.
I put the 5.0 in, or tried to, with stock 5.0 manifolds on, wrong answer, won't fit.

In my set up, I used a stock 5.0 with stock EFI manifold/plenum. I used stock motor mounts and there was no problem with clearance.
I know adjustable mounts are available from Ron Morris, but as far as I know, they are adjustable front to rear, not up and down, but I could be wrong.
Hope that helps. Good luck.
__________________
1966 Mustang, Wimbleton White 5.0L EFI/AOD
1969 F100 Ranger/all stock

Currently on my 5th Mustang

Go Navy! 1985-2005
gcroix is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009   #3 (permalink)
irish350 is offline Rookie


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4 Threads: 1
 irish350's Country Flag
Tempe/Phoenix   Arizona
Default

are you running a strut tower brace at all? if so, what brand? i like the look of the one that the car came with, but it seems to have been designed for a carbed setup, or atleast just not designed to fit these large upper intakes.
irish350 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009   #4 (permalink)
gcroix is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 216 Threads: 28
 gcroix's Country Flag
Stockbridge   Georgia
Default

I am running a brace, got it off eBay. I'm at work now but can tell you the brand later.
__________________
1966 Mustang, Wimbleton White 5.0L EFI/AOD
1969 F100 Ranger/all stock

Currently on my 5th Mustang

Go Navy! 1985-2005
gcroix is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009   #5 (permalink)
andrewmp6 is offline Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,237 Threads: 4
 andrewmp6's Country Flag
Louisville   Kentucky
Default

Btw its a 302 a 305 is a gm engine.
andrewmp6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009   #6 (permalink)
irish350 is offline Rookie


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4 Threads: 1
 irish350's Country Flag
Tempe/Phoenix   Arizona
Default

Heh heh... Yeah, I'm a gm guy too, it musta slipped :-)
irish350 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009   #7 (permalink)
andrewmp6 is offline Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,237 Threads: 4
 andrewmp6's Country Flag
Louisville   Kentucky
Default

Really a 302 is a 4.9 but ford rounded it up i guess.Gm made a 302 also most forget about it the early camaros had it.
andrewmp6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009   #8 (permalink)
irish350 is offline Rookie


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4 Threads: 1
 irish350's Country Flag
Tempe/Phoenix   Arizona
Default

thanks for all the input guys. i just found the ONLY stb on ebay made to fit a 5.0 and grabbed that...

now im looking on summit trying to decide between the dynomax and hooker coated LTs. i know theyre both good brands, but have you heard anything good/bad regarding either? should i be looking into other brands? im a firm believer in getting what you pay for when it comes to headers. are there any brands that fit (and perform) better/worse?
irish350 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1965, 5.0, header, intake, issues



Thread Tools


sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112