AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 09-28-2009   #1 (permalink)
SDMustangRider is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 175 Threads: 26
 SDMustangRider's Country Flag
SouthSD   California
Default Trying to get 300+ hp with a 289?

I'm in a dilemma between E-Street Heads and RPM performer heads. What is REALLY the big difference and would I feel any difference? Mainly used for the streets and if someone can briefly describe what the difference between the different intake clearances, etc.
SDMustangRider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009   #2 (permalink)
spikester is offline Rookie


Joined: May 2009
Posts: 9 Threads: 3
 spikester's Country Flag
puyallup   Washington
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SDMustangRider View Post
I'm in a dilemma between E-Street Heads and RPM performer heads. What is REALLY the big difference and would I feel any difference? Mainly used for the streets and if someone can briefly describe what the difference between the different intake clearances, etc.

I read that and my head exploded.
spikester is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009   #3 (permalink)
SDMustangRider is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 175 Threads: 26
 SDMustangRider's Country Flag
SouthSD   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spikester View Post
I read that and my head exploded.
hahah Sorry. I know it's probably late too. ha I don't know. Well, basically, I'm seeing what would I lose or what would I gain. They are both aluminum heads but is there really any comparable difference between them?
SDMustangRider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009   #4 (permalink)
SDMustangRider is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 175 Threads: 26
 SDMustangRider's Country Flag
SouthSD   California
Default

Bump

Just seeing if anyone knows if there's a big difference between these 2 heads in HP/Torque outcome. I found some guy selling new ones for 859.00 for the E-Streets.
SDMustangRider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009   #5 (permalink)
Jonk67 is offline Made Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 628 Threads: 10
 Jonk67's Country Flag  View Jonk67's 1 photo
Smyrna   Tennessee
Default

Here's the difference from HotRod:
Affordable Cylinder Heads - Edelbrock Aluminum E-Street Heads - Hot Rod Magazine

"The E-Street line is marketed for applications under 400 hp and 5,500 rpm. The heads appear to us to use Edelbrock's Performer RPM castings but without all the finish work and hand-blending used in the higher-cost heads. Less costly valvetrain components are used, though features such as Helicoiled rocker-stud bosses are retained. The main things limiting the rpm potential are the valvesprings, which are intended for small, flat-tappet cams; they're 1.250 in diameter and cannot handle more than 0.550-inch lift (in fact, we'd keep it closer to 0.520). Machining would be required to install larger-diameter springs. The E-Street heads are not smog-legal, as the Performer heads are.
At press time, Summit Racing's nonsale price for a pair of fully assembled E-Street heads for a small Chevy was $949.95 and the Fords were $973.95. That makes them $170 to $239 less than a set of Edelbrock Performer heads."

Really depends on if you want to increase power later it looks like, the E-Streets would take more money than the difference to the RPM's to make on par with. If you're stopping at a street car and won't go with a cam >.500 they may be Ok but you get what you pay for <$ = <hp.
Jon
__________________
'67 Coupe 289 C4, Candyapple red w/red deluxe int., PS, ext. decor group, light group, foxbody seats.
Next to install> stroked 333, AOD, 9" w/3.50:1, PDB.
'09 Black Warriors In Pink with glass roof - the wifes Mustang.
"If it ain't broke, I haven't fixed it yet" -Jon
Jonk67 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009   #6 (permalink)
SDMustangRider is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 175 Threads: 26
 SDMustangRider's Country Flag
SouthSD   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonk67 View Post
Here's the difference from HotRod:
Affordable Cylinder Heads - Edelbrock Aluminum E-Street Heads - Hot Rod Magazine

"The E-Street line is marketed for applications under 400 hp and 5,500 rpm. The heads appear to us to use Edelbrock's Performer RPM castings but without all the finish work and hand-blending used in the higher-cost heads. Less costly valvetrain components are used, though features such as Helicoiled rocker-stud bosses are retained. The main things limiting the rpm potential are the valvesprings, which are intended for small, flat-tappet cams; they're 1.250 in diameter and cannot handle more than 0.550-inch lift (in fact, we'd keep it closer to 0.520). Machining would be required to install larger-diameter springs. The E-Street heads are not smog-legal, as the Performer heads are.
At press time, Summit Racing's nonsale price for a pair of fully assembled E-Street heads for a small Chevy was $949.95 and the Fords were $973.95. That makes them $170 to $239 less than a set of Edelbrock Performer heads."

Really depends on if you want to increase power later it looks like, the E-Streets would take more money than the difference to the RPM's to make on par with. If you're stopping at a street car and won't go with a cam >.500 they may be Ok but you get what you pay for <$ = <hp.
Jon
Dang out of more than 60 views, I got an answer. haha Thanks. The reason why I asked is because I'm going with the whole top end kit, but piecing it together which I think I can be doing it cheaper than buying the kit itself. So I am definitely doing cam, intake, carb, but seeing if it is worth getting the E-streets or get something a little more sturdy like the rpm performers. Thanks for the feedback.
SDMustangRider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112