AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 10-13-2009   #1 (permalink)
kelal9698 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 7 Threads: 7
 kelal9698's Country Flag
Whiting   Alabama
Default which 8.8 in mustang

Im planning on putting the 8.8 in my 67 fastback.Ive heard different year mustangs as donars and explorers.What the best year to get I want the rear disk setup. Also does anyone sell the spring perches to weld on thanks
kelal9698 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #2 (permalink)
429ragtop is offline Apprentice


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 250 Threads: 5
 429ragtop's Country Flag
Eastern   Washington
Default

Why would you put a 8.8 in instead of a 9 inch? I dont think you will find one that will fit a 67 without alot of work.
429ragtop is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #3 (permalink)
v8only is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 290 Threads: 10
 v8only's Country Flag
Thompson   California
Default

because the 9" rears are getting rare, and are WAY too expensive.

Both the mustang and the explorer rears come out to be the exact same width as the old 8" that you currently have...

both have +'s and -

the mustang rear has a centered pumkin, and trak lok, but typically comes with 2.73 gears unless you can find an 87/88 turbocoupe tbird rear, which come with 3.73 or 3.55. The mustang rear is only 28 spline and has 4 lug drum brakes. If you convert to disc with the mustang rear, you'll need the north star or something like that brackets. Or convert to 5 lug ranger drum brakes

the explorer rear has 31 spline rear and trak lok, and comes with better gears, but is heavier and has an offset pumpkin. If you're stock ride height, then no big deal. some people who are lowered have claimed the driveshaft can bang on the tunnel on bumps.

summit racing sells perches

myself, I'm going with a 3.73 mustang rear, but I already have it. I'd prefer the centered pumpkin. I can always upgrade to the center chunk 31 spline explorer carrier in the mustang housing later if I wanted..however most of my friends run stock mustang 8.8's with 400+ horse power on slicks all day long without issues.
__________________
Jeremy

-86 ssp X chp 5.0 coupe
-66 coupe,Ford racing crate 5.0 roller engine, t5 trans
-1972 Maverick undergoing full resto
-1970 Maverick Grabber-why did I buy this one??
v8only is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #4 (permalink)
andrewmp6 is offline Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,256 Threads: 4
 andrewmp6's Country Flag
Louisville   Kentucky
Default

The downside is it has c clips make a lot of power you'll break them.The explorer is a off center diff so if your car is lowered your rear end could hit the floor pan if it bottoms out.If you can afford a fastback a crate 9 inch isn't much.I would stick with a 8 inch you got one build it up.
andrewmp6 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #5 (permalink)
Dave is online now Made Member

S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 978 Threads: 12
 Dave's Country Flag  View Dave's 6 photos
Amherst   Wisconsin
Default

Isn't the rear end on a '67' off-centered also?
Dave
__________________
427R Roush-with Roush 540 motor,2300 TVS
'66' Ranchero w/almost done 302 T-5 swap
2005 4x4 Ranger
2001 Ranger Edge
'69' Fairlane Cobra, 428 4-speed waiting for work
Dave is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #6 (permalink)
v8only is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 290 Threads: 10
 v8only's Country Flag
Thompson   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmp6 View Post
The downside is it has c clips make a lot of power you'll break them.The explorer is a off center diff so if your car is lowered your rear end could hit the floor pan if it bottoms out.If you can afford a fastback a crate 9 inch isn't much.I would stick with a 8 inch you got one build it up.
Last time I checked, a good rear from currie cost $2500.

I don't know about you, but I don't have that kind of cash.

a mustang/explorer rear costs $150 or LESS all day long.

you're not going to break those c clips. I've been in the fox mustang world for 15 years now, and to the track all of the time...I've never known anyone to break a c clip.

additionally, a stock 8.8 from a mustang will handle 400 flywheel hp all day long on slicks.

our beloved 60's mustangs have 150 from the factory. Likely less than 10% of us even have 300 flywheel around here.

the 8.8 makes the perfect rear.

that explorer 31 spline will handle more hp bone stock than all that 1% of the population here will ever need, all for $150 including disc brakes
__________________
Jeremy

-86 ssp X chp 5.0 coupe
-66 coupe,Ford racing crate 5.0 roller engine, t5 trans
-1972 Maverick undergoing full resto
-1970 Maverick Grabber-why did I buy this one??
v8only is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #7 (permalink)
Tydeorum is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 69 Threads: 20
 Tydeorum's Country Flag  View Tydeorum's 15 photos
Anderson   South Carolina
Default

So what years do we look for when it come to the explorer rear ends?
__________________
I find that laughter can cure almost anything.....if not, find the rum!

67 coupe 289 C4
99 Tacoma
Tydeorum is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #8 (permalink)
v8only is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 290 Threads: 10
 v8only's Country Flag
Thompson   California
Default

95 I "believe" was the first year for disc brakes...95-01

most, but not all came with trak lok, so be sure to verify trak lok and gear ratio at the yard before removing and plunking down cash for it.
__________________
Jeremy

-86 ssp X chp 5.0 coupe
-66 coupe,Ford racing crate 5.0 roller engine, t5 trans
-1972 Maverick undergoing full resto
-1970 Maverick Grabber-why did I buy this one??
v8only is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #9 (permalink)
Dave is online now Made Member

S197 Member


Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 978 Threads: 12
 Dave's Country Flag  View Dave's 6 photos
Amherst   Wisconsin
Default

Yep, '95' and up have the disc brakes. I've always used car-part.com to find the best buy in my area. Lots doing the V-8 into a Ranger are using the Explorer rear ends.
Dave
Explorer
Code
Description
Capacity
Ratio
41
Open 8.8"
3200
3.27

43
Open 8.8"
3200
3.08

44
Open 8.8"
3200
3.73

45
Open 8.8"
3200
3.55

D1
L/S 8.8"
3200
3.27

D2
L/S 8.8"
3200
4.10

D4
L/S 8.8"
3200
3.73

D5
L/S 8.8"
3200
3.73
L - Limited Slip Differential C - Conventional Differential
__________________
427R Roush-with Roush 540 motor,2300 TVS
'66' Ranchero w/almost done 302 T-5 swap
2005 4x4 Ranger
2001 Ranger Edge
'69' Fairlane Cobra, 428 4-speed waiting for work
Dave is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #10 (permalink)
Tydeorum is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 69 Threads: 20
 Tydeorum's Country Flag  View Tydeorum's 15 photos
Anderson   South Carolina
Default

What do you have to do to install in a 67 coupe? Is it just welding new spring perches or a lot more?
__________________
I find that laughter can cure almost anything.....if not, find the rum!

67 coupe 289 C4
99 Tacoma
Tydeorum is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #11 (permalink)
fonzoayala88 is offline Apprentice


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 244 Threads: 15
 fonzoayala88's Country Flag
Visalia   California
Default

if u use the rear end out of a mustang, u have to cut off the lower control arm mounts, and then weld the spring perches on. ive read its smart to weld the axle housings to the center piece, cuz for only plug welded them on. i have a 8.8 in my 5.0 lx, ive been wanting to put it in my 65, i want lsd, the full locking richmond dif in my 8 "acts kinda crazy some times. but i dont want to paralize my 87 either.
__________________
65 stang (t code) 351c, t-5, 8" daily driver :)
87 fox lx 5.0, t-5, 8.8, on the drive way, gettin her back on the streets soon :D
its a damn fighter jet not a pony,
and we are fighter pilots.
First On Race Day ok, not that retarded gm mopar lame saying
fonzoayala88 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #12 (permalink)
v8only is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 290 Threads: 10
 v8only's Country Flag
Thompson   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tydeorum View Post
What do you have to do to install in a 67 coupe? Is it just welding new spring perches or a lot more?
that's mostly it.

go to the carcraft site..they did it for a 67 and have an article for it, giving all the dimensions and everything
__________________
Jeremy

-86 ssp X chp 5.0 coupe
-66 coupe,Ford racing crate 5.0 roller engine, t5 trans
-1972 Maverick undergoing full resto
-1970 Maverick Grabber-why did I buy this one??
v8only is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009   #13 (permalink)
Sick467 is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 156 Threads: 26
 Sick467's Country Flag  View Sick467's 11 photos
Farmington   Missouri
Default

Some things to concider...

1.) Spring Perch location and angle (been discussed)
2.) Overall width, my 8.8 from a 2003 explorer is about a 1/2" wider than stock. Not too big of a deal unless you already maxed out your tire/wheel sizes.
3.) The disk brake set-up may require a different master cylinder to accomodate the different volume of brake fluid required to fully actuate the rear brakes. And/Or a proportioning valve to adjust/balance your front to back brakes.
4.) If you have your car lowered, the offset pumpkin will likely cause the diff yoke/driveshaft to hit the passenger side tunnel under the back seat at least at the bumps in the road. This can be fixed with a hammer if you don't mind.
5.) The rear drive shaft yoke may have to be changed, but I'm not sure about this - my drive shaft is still in the shed and I plan on going to an AOD so I'll have to check both of my yokes.
6.) Your rear wheels will need to clear the new disc set-up. 14s won't unless your backspacing is near nil which is highly unlikely.
7) The shock plates and U-bolts will have to be changed to accomodate the difference in axel tube diameter. My 8.8 was 3.25 inches where the stock 4 lugger was 3. Currie carries these.

That's about it.
__________________
Ride On,
Noel

"I'll fix it or break it, Guaranteed!"
My Garage - 67 Mustang Coupe, 67 GTO, 67 Sprite, 72 Chevy PU, & Old Ford 8N.
Sick467 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009   #14 (permalink)
429ragtop is offline Apprentice


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 250 Threads: 5
 429ragtop's Country Flag
Eastern   Washington
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sick467 View Post
Some things to concider...

1.) Spring Perch location and angle (been discussed)
2.) Overall width, my 8.8 from a 2003 explorer is about a 1/2" wider than stock. Not too big of a deal unless you already maxed out your tire/wheel sizes.
3.) The disk brake set-up may require a different master cylinder to accomodate the different volume of brake fluid required to fully actuate the rear brakes. And/Or a proportioning valve to adjust/balance your front to back brakes.
4.) If you have your car lowered, the offset pumpkin will likely cause the diff yoke/driveshaft to hit the passenger side tunnel under the back seat at least at the bumps in the road. This can be fixed with a hammer if you don't mind.
5.) The rear drive shaft yoke may have to be changed, but I'm not sure about this - my drive shaft is still in the shed and I plan on going to an AOD so I'll have to check both of my yokes.
6.) Your rear wheels will need to clear the new disc set-up. 14s won't unless your backspacing is near nil which is highly unlikely.
7) The shock plates and U-bolts will have to be changed to accomodate the difference in axel tube diameter. My 8.8 was 3.25 inches where the stock 4 lugger was 3. Currie carries these.

That's about it.


and all this brings me back to my original question, get the nine inch and do a disc conversion. they are not hard to find, why go through all the hassle?
429ragtop is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009   #15 (permalink)
Sick467 is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 156 Threads: 26
 Sick467's Country Flag  View Sick467's 11 photos
Farmington   Missouri
Default

There's pros and cons with both options. I've read discussions that argue which one is better and technically - I can't go there. I came to the conclusion that they are equivilent for my application (actually overkill for a 300 hp 289 or 302). An 8" comes a dime a dozen, but cost almost as much as a 9" to rebuild. In my case a 9" was not readily available and my builder said that the 9" would cost about 300$ more to build plus the cost of buying a core to start with. I paid 1750$ for a completely rebuilt 8.8 with Ford Motorsports 11" disc brakes and braided stainless brake lines. There was some hassle in finding the right shock plates, I'm not lowering the rear, and I haven't determined my wheel & tire size yet, but I traded this for the hassle of finding a 9" core for a good price. And there are alot of 9" varieties out there that pose the same questions like perch locactions, overall width, etc.

8.8s aren't for everyone, but it fits my bill.
__________________
Ride On,
Noel

"I'll fix it or break it, Guaranteed!"
My Garage - 67 Mustang Coupe, 67 GTO, 67 Sprite, 72 Chevy PU, & Old Ford 8N.
Sick467 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112