1968 Mustang replacing starter: high torque or original? - Ford Mustang Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-20-2009 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
dv068's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: boston
Posts: 17
 
Send a message via Skype™ to dv068
1968 Mustang replacing starter: high torque or original?

I'm planning to install a new starter in my 289 coupe because it's not getting enough power to start, especially when the engine's hot. Should I get a "new original" one, or one with higher (e.g. Powermaster 90 ft./lbs) torque rating? I'm worried I might ruin the engine with the higher torque rating, but don't want to run into the problem of not having enough torque with the original... Which one should I get? Thanks for the advice!

68 mustang coupe, 289ci 2v, candyapple red, sprint version
dv068 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-20-2009
Apprentice
 
mustang402's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Windsor
Posts: 149
 
Is your motor stock? If so the stock starter will work just fine and save the money. Are you sure that it is not your battery or bad cables or connections? If you are planning to do some serious engine upgrades I would go with the high torque, I did on my 67 coupe when I installed my crate motor. The starter will not ruin the engine unless you get the wrong one Ie. proper offset for your specific set up. I'm using a PMW-9604 powermaster from summit. It fits a 164 tooth 1972 belhousing manual trans. It was expensive but I'm cranking a 302 motor with about 362HP and didn't want problems later with heat issues from my headers. It is smaller and does not take up as much as a stock starter.HTH
mustang402 is offline  
post #3 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-20-2009
GT Member
Classic Member
 
SPeace-ATL's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,772
 
I put a high-torque mini starter in my 65 from Autozone.
I highly recommend it! It saves space and leaves plenty of clearance for things like headers...

It is quite energetic when I hit the key.

I think I looked up a 93 Mustang GT and selected that one.

Stan -
1965 5.0 Coupe /MAF/EFI/AOD/B303 Roller Cam

Mustang Manual Transmission Specialist
SPeace-ATL is offline  
post #4 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-20-2009
PONY Member
 
Joel_L's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 340
 
I put a Jegs mini hi torque starter on mine. Sure like the extra clearance it gives for my headers.
Joel_L is offline  
post #5 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-21-2009
MACH I Member
Classic Member
5.0L Member
 
The Greek's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 3,184
 
A good reason to go with a newer design starter is the fact that you have eliminated the need to use battery power to energize the wire wound electro magnets used in the old style starters. The reason that the old starters used electro magnets is that the technology at that time didn't have the ability to economically produce permanent magnets that could deliver the required magnetic field to produce the starter's desired torque. The newer starter's additional internal gear reduction also contributes to producing more torque with less battery drain.

Do yourself and your battery a favor and upgrade to the newer more compact starter. An OE starter of the newer design should work just fine for most street applications. Even if a high torque aftermarket starter were to be used, there will be no negative effect on the engine. It will just turn over easier. I will not use an older electro magnet starter unless I were concerned about period correctness. Get rid of that problematic overweight antique.
The Greek is offline  
post #6 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-21-2009
PONY Member
Classic Member
 
Ranger1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Charleston
Posts: 491
 
I just did this today, and will never look back. My old starter died and I replaced it with one for a 95 Mustang 5.0 The rewiring is simple and the only thing extra I had to do was shim the starter out with a couple of flat washers. The starter was engaging so much that it sounded like there was drag on the flex plate, so I shimmed the starter out and now it sounds perfect. My next project is getting rid of the Fred Flintstone brakes, and installing something that will actually stop me when and where I want to stop.
Ranger1 is offline  
post #7 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-21-2009
PONY Member
Classic Member
 
jspagna1's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 541
 
Yes, I changed mine out for the Ford Racing Mini Starter.

Mustangs Unlimited

1966 Mustang Coupe
Ford Racing 5.0 HO Motor(Crate)/B303 cam/1.7 RR
TFS TW Heads/Edelbrock Perfor RPM/Holley 650 DP
Mallory Dist/MSD Blaster/Holley Electric Fuel Pump
2.5" Exh H pipe/Flowmasters 40's/Dr.Gas Tailpipes
Lakewood T/A Bars/Aluminum Drive Shaft + loop
Auburn 3.55's/SSBC disc's/C-4 wTCI 2800 stall
Fiberglass hood/trunk/bumpers!(100% Sicilian)
jspagna1 is offline  
post #8 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-21-2009
MACH I Member
Classic Member
 
Print Dad's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: Medford
Posts: 2,749
 
1968 Mustang replacing starter: high torque or original?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dv068 View Post
I'm planning to install a new starter in my 289 coupe because it's not getting enough power to start, especially when the engine's hot. Should I get a "new original" one, or one with higher (e.g. Powermaster 90 ft./lbs) torque rating? I'm worried I might ruin the engine with the higher torque rating, but don't want to run into the problem of not having enough torque with the original... Which one should I get? Thanks for the advice!
Hello dv068,
First hello from "Meffa". Medford , Mass LOL

I like the mini starters and agree that it is a good idea.
The only question I have is what is the timing set at?

If the timing is too far advanced it gets hard to crank especially when hot.

Just something to check.
Perhaps I'll see you at a cruise night

Print Dad
Print Dad is offline  
post #9 of 11 (permalink) Old 10-22-2009
Rookie
4.6L Member
 
pvtdiaz's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 19
 
i have a high torque mini starter from powermaster which has not given me any problems it cranks easier and better than the original not only is it smaller but mine also adjust 360 degrees so that you can adjust the solenoid part where ever.
pvtdiaz is offline  
MACH I Member
Classic Member
5.0L Member
 
The Greek's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 3,184
 
Ranger1, I think that the reason that you had to shim your OE Ford starter is that you have the wrong starter for the transmission type. The difference in them deals with the depth of the gear on the starter end. Since the washers worked for you, that's great.
The Greek is offline  
PONY Member
Classic Member
 
Ranger1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Charleston
Posts: 491
 
Greek,
The starter is supposed to fit the auto tranny model, which is what I have. I may not have had to shim it, but it certainly sounds better shimmed vs unshimmed.
Ranger1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Random Question

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183