First, I personally think the shorties would be better. You get a lot more versatility with them. I have them on my 65 289 and they are great to work with in that cramped, little engine bay. But that is just my own opinion.
I have also heard from some people that the long tube headers give issues like road scraping in bumpy/pot holed road areas, coming out of some driveway/parking lots, speed bumps, etc.
The 351C. I heard that it makes things really cramped in the engine bay. I have 'heard stories' of people having to beat on the shock towers a little bit to make the manifolds/headers fit. But that's just what I heard. But I have heard clevelands have great power potential.
I believe the Clevelands are suppose to be a little bigger than the Windsors.
__________________ 65 Mustang 289 C4. Edelbrock 600cfm (no more Pony Carb Autolite), Shorty Headers with 2 1/2" collector & glasspacks, Shiftkit, 5-leaf stock height rear springs, 620lbs/1" drop front springs, Gas Adjust shocks, 14x7 American Racing S200 Daisy Rims, low-mid range cam, 1 1/8" front sway bar & 3/4" rear sway bar, & ~3.80's (I think) in the rear. |