1966 Mustang 289 Exhaust manifold Torque Spec. Please - Ford Mustang Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-14-2010 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
ccarccrazy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Strongsville
Posts: 19
 
1966 Mustang 289 Exhaust manifold Torque Spec. Please

I'm hearing all kinds of torque specs for '66 289. A thread on this site stated 13-18 ft. lbs! That sounds like intake manifold rather than exhaust. The exhaust manifold bolts are 3/8" Shouldn't they be around 35 ft. lbs?

Also, should I use gaskets? This same site mentioned if you use gaskets you can crack the exhaust manifold. Is this true????

Also, how 'bout torque specs for timing cover and waterpump?

Thanks in advance for your responses.
ccarccrazy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-14-2010
GT Member
 
Joes72/65's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Imperial Beach
Posts: 1,460
 
My Shop Manual says 13 -18 ft/lbs, too. It also says to apply graphite grease to the mating surface, not a gasket.

Joe
'65 Coupe, 302, Autolite 4100, C4, 2.80
'72 Grande, 351C, Motorcraft 2100, FMX, 2.75
Joes72/65 is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-14-2010 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
ccarccrazy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Strongsville
Posts: 19
 
Thank you Joe.
My aluminum intake manifold bolts state 15 ft/lbs. and they are only 5/16". It seems strange that cast iron exhaust manifolds with 3/8" bolts are 13-18 ft/lbs. I'm pretty sure they are grade 5. I found a torque website that states 36 lbs. for grade 5 3/8" bolts.

Unless I hear otherwise, I'll torque them to 13-18 ft/lbs.

Anyone know the timing cover and waterpump ft/lbs?
ccarccrazy is offline  
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-14-2010
GT Member
 
Joes72/65's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Imperial Beach
Posts: 1,460
 
12 - 15 ft/lbs for both. The torque value for the exhaust probably seems low for the bolt size because of the extreme heat they are subject to. Trust me, after you run the engine a bit, they ain't comin' out!

Joe
'65 Coupe, 302, Autolite 4100, C4, 2.80
'72 Grande, 351C, Motorcraft 2100, FMX, 2.75
Joes72/65 is offline  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old 08-14-2010 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
ccarccrazy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Strongsville
Posts: 19
 
Thanks again Joe. I'll bet if they were torqued tighter they might break with the heat expansion.
ccarccrazy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome