1966 Mustang-PCV valve delete - Ford Mustang Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-12-2010 Thread Starter
Rookie
Classic Member
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 9
 
1966 Mustang-PCV valve delete

My 66 is a weekend driver these days and I am thinking about pulling the pcv valve and replacing it with a breather cap. It seems to me that with the tiny amount of driving time it gets there is little effect on the environment. Besides its not a sealed system anyway with a breather on the oil filler. I am thinking that it would be worth it to keep the oil blow by out of the intake and keep the engine a little neater without another hose in there. Are there any negatives to this?
Havoc is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-13-2010
GT Member
 
Joes72/65's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Imperial Beach
Posts: 1,462
 
Absolutely. The PCV system isn't there to help keep the environment clean, despite what all the tree-huggers would have you believe. It's there to keep your crankcase clean. I'd much rather put up with one hose in my engine bay than have to change my oil every 1000 miles. Under the right conditions, blow-by gases in the crankcase can actually catch fire if they are not properly evacuated. Cleaner emissions are just a free bonus, not the primary purpose.

Joe
'65 Coupe, 302, Autolite 4100, C4, 2.80
'72 Grande, 351C, Motorcraft 2100, FMX, 2.75
Joes72/65 is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-13-2010
SHELBY GT 350 Member
Classic Member
 
Veronica's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,962
     
Hello. Ditto. The reason that the oil filler cap is vented is to provide a point of entry for fresh air. You have the pcv valve sucking gases out of the crankcase. If you don't have a place for air to come in, the pcv valve can't pull anything out. Air goes in through the oil filler cap, not out.
Veronica is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-13-2010
SHELBY GT 350 Member
Classic Member
 
Ivy66GT's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 6,068
 
I think you don't understand the physics of a road draft tube.

A PCV system draws gases SLOWLY out of the crankcase, through the carb and burns them eventually. Its purpose IS to keep that stuff out of the atmosphere. Why else did it only appear on emission controlled cars? On 60s Fords it was sometimes a $5 option but later became mandatory by first CA and then the feds.

A road draft tube hangs down and is designed such that the moving air flowing past it causes a partial vacuum (exactly the same way that a carb venturi works) that sucks the gases out much more quickly since there is no flow restriction as in the PCV valve, etc. Some systems have additional restriction after the valve to further impede gas flow so as not to flood the intake system with blowby. The crankcase will be much CLEANER with a road draft tube than a PCV. If anything, oil change intervals would be LONGER using a road draft tube than a PCV. I doubt it actually makes any difference for oil changes.

If the engine has blowby (which they all do to some extent) then it has to go somewhere. Replacing the PCV hose with a breather means its going to make an oily mess on your valve cover. The road draft tube would dump it into the air below the engine. Doing away with the PCV will not help performance in the least so I fail to see a reason to work very hard to get rid of it. If blowby is so bad that its plugging the PCV, etc., its time for an engine overhaul. Smoky old cars give the hobby a bad name and give those tree-huggers an excuse to want to work harder to make old cars illegal which some of them already would like to do.
Ivy66GT is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-13-2010
GT Member
 
Joes72/65's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Imperial Beach
Posts: 1,462
 
I wasn't arguing against a road draft tube, but rather the elimination of any ventilation device at all. I've never had a road draft tube, but the people I know that did have them say they didn't really work all that well. If the OP wants a road draft tube rather than a PCV, it's still 100% better than nothing.

Joe
'65 Coupe, 302, Autolite 4100, C4, 2.80
'72 Grande, 351C, Motorcraft 2100, FMX, 2.75
Joes72/65 is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-13-2010 Thread Starter
Rookie
Classic Member
 
Havoc's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 9
 
Well a RD tube will actually go against my original intention wich was simply to clean up the engine bay. I was just thinking not being a sealed system like modern cars the start up gasses are not being captured that well anyway and id cut out what oil does run back into the intake as well. However if its really going to be that negative then its not worth the effort. Glad I asked first.
Havoc is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-13-2010
GT Member
 
Joes72/65's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Imperial Beach
Posts: 1,462
 
Just to set you more at ease, any oil that goes into the intake is immediately incinerated in the 600+ degree combustion, so it does no harm to any of your engine components. It never has a chance to settle in and gum anything up.

Joe
'65 Coupe, 302, Autolite 4100, C4, 2.80
'72 Grande, 351C, Motorcraft 2100, FMX, 2.75
Joes72/65 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183