AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 07-22-2005   #1 (permalink)
StangDrvr6586 is offline Rookie


Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 20 Threads: 9
Default 65 Mustang Suspension & Engine Questions

Hello everyone. I have a 65 Mustang that I am restoring. It originally came with a straight 6 and a cruise-o-matic tranny. I am naturally converting to a v8 and a stick. First off, I just happen to have a 460 big block sitting in my garage, which I would like to find it's way into the 65. Naturally I will have to get rid of the shock towers; I found a Mustang II with the complete front suspension in a local boneyard and can get it pretty cheap.

Does this sound do-able? I know there will be lots of measuring, cutting, measuring, tack welding, measuring, cutting, measuring, tack welding, and measuring. What else may be involved?

Are headers made for this or would I have to custom make my own? Oil pans? Motor mounts?

Thanks everyone.
StangDrvr6586 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2005   #2 (permalink)
runnin_hot is offline Rookie


Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13 Threads: 2
 runnin_hot's Country Flag
Frederick   Maryland
Default

Definitely not for the faint of heart but it is doable as long as you have the tools and the tenacity. I'm sure you're probably like the rest of us and you have your budget constraints but bear in mind that an old Mustang II front end while initally sounding cheap may cost you more than you expect in the long run when you factor in replacing worn parts like ball joints, brakes, springs, tie rods etc... You might be better off using a conversion kit from heidts, fatman or the like but I suppose that depends on the donor Mustang II. Good luck and have fun!
runnin_hot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2005   #3 (permalink)
mustangmike2003 is offline Rookie


Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22 Threads: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by runnin_hot
Definitely not for the faint of heart but it is doable as long as you have the tools and the tenacity. I'm sure you're probably like the rest of us and you have your budget constraints but bear in mind that an old Mustang II front end while initally sounding cheap may cost you more than you expect in the long run when you factor in replacing worn parts like ball joints, brakes, springs, tie rods etc... You might be better off using a conversion kit from heidts, fatman or the like but I suppose that depends on the donor Mustang II. Good luck and have fun!
I agree ive seen guys trying to save a buck and ended up paying more then if they wouldve ordered all the parts new... and not to scare you but they STILL didnt get the parts to work right.. do it right.. your front end is a big safty deal..cutting and choping in older parts sounds like bad news... ive seen cool kits though.. come with a rack and pinion converson (power or manule) a McPherson converson (wich elimenates the upper controll arm and has a cool adjustible coilover set up) and of corse new towers that look like stock...look into it
mustangmike2003 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2005   #4 (permalink)
monkeystash is offline Rookie


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3 Threads: 0
Kennesaw, GA
Default Keep it a small block

In my opinion, small blocks are better in early Mustangs. That 460 is really heavy. Small block Ford parts are cheap and there are so many options out there: 289/302 to 347, 351 to 408. I guarantee you that you can build a 408 (351 stroker) for less money than that 460 and it will be faster and lighter. Plus engine compartment room. You mentioned removing the shock towers. Mustangs were designed to transfer suspension loads through the towers and Mustang II suspensions only use the thin, weak frame rails. Add the weight of a 460 to that too. We are all individuals, so do what you please, just my 2 cents.
monkeystash is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5.0 Lincoln Mark 7 engine swap to 1972 Mustang Help ADrock Classic Tech 10 12-08-2005 01:20 AM
Unanswered Mustang Questions 199 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 15 07-02-2005 12:27 PM
were to find a 2005 mustang without trans or engine boss429mustangj 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 4 06-30-2005 07:46 AM
after market savagess Test Area 0 06-26-2005 10:20 AM
1965 289 Mustang engine oil brand/type? earlymustang Classic Tech 3 04-06-2005 09:32 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112