AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 05-25-2006   #1 (permalink)
1965stangman is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4 Threads: 2
 1965stangman's Country Flag
Ashdown   Arkansas
Default 1965 Mustang 4.6l 32v engine swap?

I just got my hands on a '65 that came with a 289 4 speed. I may freshen up the old motor just to get it going but what I would really like to do is have the advantages of a modern fuel injected engine. I know 32v "Cobra" engines are hard to come by but have heard that the version that was put in the likes of the Lincoln Mark VIII cars was pretty close. I have driven several and was impressed with how well it pulled such a big car. I wonder if anyone here has any insights into what it would take to shoehorn one of these into a classic 65. Any and all help will be greatly appreciated.
1965stangman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2006   #2 (permalink)
GTRaptor is offline Member

4.6L Member


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,629 Threads: 152
 GTRaptor's Country Flag  View GTRaptor's 605 photos  View GTRaptor's 69 products for your review  View GTRaptor's HomePage
Mexico City
Send a message via Yahoo to GTRaptor
Default

Lots of money and many parts, for one you need the EEC Harness, sensors, actuators, relay boxes, plus a transmission (T45, T3650, T56 or 4R70W AODE).

One interesting "twist" would be to use a CARBED DOHC engine, have seen this, but the engine has to be modified to accept an electronic distributor. It mounts in one of the valvecovers and is driven by one of the cams.. the problem is finding someone good enough to do it.

By no means any of the options would be cheap, except if you get a donor car with all the goodies. A Lincoln is a good option, the only drawback of that engine is the CAMS (good for low end but crap on top) and the heads which are a bit restrictive.

If you do get one, get a complete wiring diagram to assemble it.

Also forgot, you will need to cut the stru towers and modify the front suspension to use coilovers. The DOHC is wide, wider than a big block.
__________________
Rob Hernandez, AFM
GTRaptor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2006   #3 (permalink)
Cracker289 is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 602 Threads: 61
 Cracker289's Country Flag  View Cracker289's 5 photos
Raleigh   North Carolina
Send a message via AIM to Cracker289 Send a message via Yahoo to Cracker289
Default

Back in 93 I think it was, when the 4.6 was being used in the Mark VII but not yet in the Mustang, I read & saw pictures in Mustang & Fords magazine where a guy got one and put it into an older Mustang. It was too wide to fit between the shock towers, so what he did was cut the shock towers out and upgrade the front suspension to Mustang II type setup. Other than he fabricated the motor mounts and transferred everything else from the Lincoln to keep the electronics. Looked pretty sweet and the owner was very happy with the performance.
__________________
66 Coupe - CandyApple Red, 2 barrel 289, C4.
66 Coupe - (father-daughter project). Tangier Orange, 302 with AOD, 17 inch Bullit wheels.
69 F-100 - 351c. Emerald Green Metallic paint. Still "in progress".
68 Barracuda - Rusted out project. 318 in the frame rails for now. Maybe a 360 in the future.
00 Mustang - (son's car) V6, 18 inch Saleen wheels.
Cracker289 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2006   #4 (permalink)
Blade10 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 509 Threads: 9
 Blade10's Country Flag
Northern   Virginia
Default

Why not use the 5.0 HO fuel injection setup?

Blade
Blade10 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006   #5 (permalink)
5.0 in a 66 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 682 Threads: 2
 5.0 in a 66's Country Flag
Parkersburg   West Virginia
Default

The SOHC motors will fit with shaved shocktowers. For the DOHC motors, the stock suspension gets junked in favor of a MII, Griggs, or SN95/Fatman Fab front suspension. You're looking at 2500 and up just for the suspension. The iron block mod motors are heavy and the light DOHC aluminum engines cost a fortune. Neat, and I'd do it if I were rich, but not the best idea for Joe Schmo IMO. Both don't really make insane HP unless super/tubo/nitrous assisted.
__________________
66 coupe 5.0/T5, home-brewed power 4 wheel disc setup, 350hp+, looks like it belongs in 1968
5.0 in a 66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006   #6 (permalink)
1965stangman is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4 Threads: 2
 1965stangman's Country Flag
Ashdown   Arkansas
Default

Sounds like my pipe dream engine would be more trouble than it's worth in the long run. I might have to look more into what might be the best SOHC engine to use. Finding a donor car is a must so I can get all the wiring and the computer but I really want fuel injection. Any ideas as to where to go with this? I have been a chevy guy all my life and can build a sbc in my sleep but the options for fords are not that familiar to me. And I want to post a BIG THANX for the reply's I have gotten this far.
1965stangman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2006   #7 (permalink)
Perry1977 is offline Rookie


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8 Threads: 1
 Perry1977's Country Flag
Parker   Colorado
Default

I am about to start on my '65 fastback and I have been thinking about this same thing as well. I am trying to figure out the best way to go, and have just started looking around.

The shock towers in these cars are a pain in the butt and very restrictive, so plan on getting rid of them if you do it. $2,500 seems a little steep for the suspension setup, you can get a ready to weld in crossmember from Heidt's for $400 (http://www.heidts.com/heip32-2.htm), and if you don't care about tubular A-arms you can find a donor car for the majority of the components somewhere. For my '38 coupe I found a trashed '80 Pinto and bought the whole car from the lady for $50. Mustang II and Pinto suspensions are the same, except the Pinto has shorter support arms.

Anyways let me know what you find out, and I will do the same. There was a wrecked Saleen at an auction a couple weeks ago that really helped put this crazy idea in my head.
Perry1977 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2006   #8 (permalink)
Preacher17 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
V6 Member


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,025 Threads: 50
 Preacher17's Country Flag  View Preacher17's 5 photos
Enterprise   Alabama
Default

Just a thought...but once you rip out the front end and start doing major modifications the car loses most of its resale value in case you were ever thinking about selling her. Makes more sense money wise to sell the car and get something that is closer to what you want or need.

Mike
Preacher17 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006   #9 (permalink)
edgars23 is offline Apprentice

Classic Member
4.6L Member


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 73 Threads: 8
 edgars23's Country Flag  View edgars23's HomePage
Los Angeles Area   California
Send a message via AIM to edgars23 Send a message via Yahoo to edgars23
Default

Doing a 4.6 conversion is a very interesting project for some people. I actually cosidered it for a shot whiel on my coupe. I decided against it because I have already rebuilt my entire suspension, so to ripping it all out and wasting all of that money did not sound all the good to me. Here is a copmpany that you may be interested in. They sell just about everythign you need to do the 4.6 conversion and have been featured in Mustangs and Fast Fords (or another stang mag) for doing this exact conversion. You may have heard of the project called M.I.B. or Mustang In Black. These are the people behind that conversion.

http://www.dvsrestorations.com/

If you can get ahold of a 99 wrecked cobra, or evern a 99-04 donor gt, it would make such a project easier than ordering all the seperate parts. This type of conversion is for someone with deep pockets or plenty of time and skill.

With that said, anyone considering this project needs to think long and hard about your future goals for this car. If you are going to want to keep until the day you die, or pass it on to your kids, then go right ahead and do any type of conversion you wish. But if this is something you will not finish, you will be lucky if you can sell this unfinished project as scrap. Not many people are interested in cars that have had extension work done in this matter. So before you or anyone start, make sure you will finish this project. Because if you don't, it will be a back yard ornament for some time.
-Edgar
edgars23 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2006   #10 (permalink)
Perry1977 is offline Rookie


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8 Threads: 1
 Perry1977's Country Flag
Parker   Colorado
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Preacher17
Just a thought...but once you rip out the front end and start doing major modifications the car loses most of its resale value in case you were ever thinking about selling her. Makes more sense money wise to sell the car and get something that is closer to what you want or need.

Mike
I doubt it. I would even argue that with some cars (T-code 6-cylinders for example), it would significantly increase the resale value. Nobody wants a 6-cylinder fastback. Why would they? Bcause it's "original"? Those guys are dying out.

Now, my car happens to be an "A" code fastback, non-GT. Worth a bit more, but still nothing that special. If you've seen one, you've seen them all. But, if it were a K-code or a GT, there's no way I would consider it.

The idea for this car is to be somewhat of a Shelby clone, but that doesn't mean I am going to rigidly adhere to making it an exact replica. I love the idea of a late model motor for the driveability, reliability, and performance. Modern performance with old-school styling is the ultimate ride in my opinion.

As for what I "want or need", I have wanted a '65 fastback for a looong time now, but thanks for your input.
Perry1977 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2006   #11 (permalink)
Preacher17 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
V6 Member


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,025 Threads: 50
 Preacher17's Country Flag  View Preacher17's 5 photos
Enterprise   Alabama
Default

Have you checked e-bay lately!!!! Fastbacks regardless of whether they are a six or an eight are selling for am arm and a leg...in the case of the v8 cars two legs! (and in the case of verts an arm two legs and your first born). Coupes are still resonable priced but FB's and verts are going for 20 to 30G's six cyl cars are easily converted to v8's and still bring nearly as much...not the kind of car I would choose to modify to the point of no return. That A code FB of yours may be a bit more special than you realize. Mine's a C code that came original with a Pony interior...nothing left of it at the moment but it took me forever to find one at a resonable price even though it's a basket case. Anyway take care of her you may find that you never get a chance at another. She's worth keeping.
Preacher17 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2007   #12 (permalink)
G-Force is offline Rookie


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11 Threads: 3
 G-Force's Country Flag
Columbus   Ohio
Default Yea I'm nuts

I took a 65 Fastback Pony int 289 auto, cut it off in front of the windsheild, installed a new inner structure and core support from CJ's. Then I cut out the new shock towers and installed the Heidts kit to make way for the 03 Terminator engine and T56. It's been a lot of work so far but I love this kind of stuff. After the Factory Five Cobra I hadn't had enough fun so I started this project for my son. Ford made so many of these cars that there will always be many stock cars. I wanted to do somthing different. Also when I got this car it was a rusted wreck. What do you think???
Attached Thumbnails
1965-mustang-4-6l-32v-engine-swap-mustang-240.jpg  
G-Force is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007   #13 (permalink)
Preacher17 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
V6 Member


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,025 Threads: 50
 Preacher17's Country Flag  View Preacher17's 5 photos
Enterprise   Alabama
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Force View Post
I took a 65 Fastback Pony int 289 auto, cut it off in front of the windsheild, installed a new inner structure and core support from CJ's. Then I cut out the new shock towers and installed the Heidts kit to make way for the 03 Terminator engine and T56. It's been a lot of work so far but I love this kind of stuff. After the Factory Five Cobra I hadn't had enough fun so I started this project for my son. Ford made so many of these cars that there will always be many stock cars. I wanted to do somthing different. Also when I got this car it was a rusted wreck. What do you think???
What I think is that you have seriously underestimated the value of your car. Sure Ford made over 500,000 mustangs in 65 BUT they only made 5776 pony fastbacks that year. How many of those were A codes?...I don't know but it wasn't many of them the C code was much more common. Your car restored would have been worth about $54,000 (NADA price guide) what it will be worth modified is anybodies guess. It's your car and I wish you the best with it the project looks like it is off to a good start but it surely would have been worth more had you at the least left it in a restorable condition and limited the mods to bolt on and the like.
__________________
1966 Fastback
1997 V6 Mustang
1998 GT

"Government is not the answer to our problems, government is the problem."

Ronald Reagan
Preacher17 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #14 (permalink)
G-Force is offline Rookie


Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11 Threads: 3
 G-Force's Country Flag
Columbus   Ohio
Default

The car could always be restored to original. CJ's still sell the parts. Just cut it off and start over. I know where you are coming from , it was a hard decision to modify the car that much. The car was so rusted and wrecked that no one would give me serious money for it. I was thinking about removing the drip rail. That would be hard to reverse, so I probably won't. Thanks for your thoughts. Update: Mustang is a roller and engine fitting starting.
Attached Thumbnails
1965-mustang-4-6l-32v-engine-swap-smmustang-322.jpg  
G-Force is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007   #15 (permalink)
Preacher17 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
V6 Member


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,025 Threads: 50
 Preacher17's Country Flag  View Preacher17's 5 photos
Enterprise   Alabama
Default

The good thing is the car isn't being lost...I'm redoing a basketcase too gonna drive me to the poor house before it's done anyway good luck with the project and post some pics from time to time it will be interesting to see how it's comming along.
__________________
1966 Fastback
1997 V6 Mustang
1998 GT

"Government is not the answer to our problems, government is the problem."

Ronald Reagan
Preacher17 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2.5 liter swap to a 1993 ford mustang austin9393 2.3L Tech 3 07-27-2008 09:11 AM
engine swap 1996 Mustang 3.8 to a 1999-2004 Mustang 3.8... sparticus56 V6 Tech 9 05-23-2007 11:48 PM
1996 GT Engine Swap JDHayes 4.6L Tech 4 07-05-2006 07:41 PM
engine swap help im desperate KIDMILO21 4.6L Tech 1 05-03-2006 11:19 PM
1965 Mustang Engine Swap to 5.0 HO. Need Some Help. Assassin_47 5.0L Tech 1 05-01-2006 04:10 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112