AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 11-03-2006   #16 (permalink)
lonestar69stang is offline Apprentice

Classic Member
4.6L Member


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 173 Threads: 38
 lonestar69stang's Country Flag  View lonestar69stang's 32 photos
College Station   Texas
Send a message via AIM to lonestar69stang
Default

Like 1qwk67 said up there, you need to watch your hood clearance. on my 69 grande i installed a performer rpm air gap, and 750 cfm carb and topped it off with a k&n 9 inch air cleaner, still ended up knocking a whole out of my hood, but i have a mach 1 scoop on it so it's tucked up under there. i got edelbrocks performer rpm package with the perofmer rpm cam and heads, it's a little slow at lower rpm's but when it hits 1500 it launches.
lonestar69stang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006   #17 (permalink)
taospec is offline Rookie


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14 Threads: 2
 taospec's Country Flag
Southern California   California
Default

Wow! Thank you, everyone.

The car is '64 /12, but my father installed a new 302cid engine in 1973. I will have to watch closely for clearance issues, as stated by all. So, I will stick with the 600-650cfm Edlebrock carb., but now it's between deciding Weiand Stealth, or Edlebrock Performer intakes.

Would I be able to feel any difference in power or torque by mearly adding just the intake to my block and Edlebrock carb?

I am not planning on swapping out the exhaust manifolds, unless I have to. So far, I have a custom made exhasut that is neatly attached to them, that leaks into Flowmaster 2 ch mufflers, and the Edlebrock carb, w/ spacer. My cousin advised me to keep the spacer on even after I get the manifold. Is that a good idea?
taospec is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006   #18 (permalink)
03svtsnakevert is offline Rookie


Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 44 Threads: 1
 03svtsnakevert's Country Flag
copperas cove   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taospec
Wow! Thank you, everyone.

The car is '64 /12, but my father installed a new 302cid engine in 1973. I will have to watch closely for clearance issues, as stated by all. So, I will stick with the 600-650cfm Edlebrock carb., but now it's between deciding Weiand Stealth, or Edlebrock Performer intakes.

Would I be able to feel any difference in power or torque by mearly adding just the intake to my block and Edlebrock carb?

I am not planning on swapping out the exhaust manifolds, unless I have to. So far, I have a custom made exhasut that is neatly attached to them, that leaks into Flowmaster 2 ch mufflers, and the Edlebrock carb, w/ spacer. My cousin advised me to keep the spacer on even after I get the manifold. Is that a good idea?
You will feel a difference in power by mounting the performer rpm intake or any aforementioned aftermarket intake on the car...they just flat flow better than stock...

as far as carbs, I would go with Holley...they are easier to tune and you can get more out of them...with edelbrocks you have to mess with metering rods and the like...for out of the box performance buy whatever carb you like...I like my Holleys and now my Barry Grant Mighty Demon 825 cfm for tuneability...it seems that you can dial these carbs in a bit easier when making changes...I have had Holleys for years and been tuning for people for just as long...Does this mean that Edelbrock makes a bad carb? No, it is just not my choice to run an edelbrock carb.

just my .02
__________________
Previous and Current Rides:
1967 Ford Mustang Coupe
2002 Ford Mustang GT--SOLD!
1967 Ford Fairlane 500 XL--SOLD!
2003 Ford Mustang Cobra 1 of 308--SOLD!!
2003 Kawasaki Mean Streak--SOLD!!
2006 Suzuki M109R--SOLD!!
2006 Harley Davidson Screamin' Eagle V-Rod
03svtsnakevert is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006   #19 (permalink)
1qwk67 is offline Apprentice

Classic Member


Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 60 Threads: 1
 1qwk67's Country Flag  View 1qwk67's 12 photos
Columbia   Kentucky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 03svtsnakevert
You will feel a difference in power by mounting the performer rpm intake or any aforementioned aftermarket intake on the car...they just flat flow better than stock...

as far as carbs, I would go with Holley...they are easier to tune and you can get more out of them...with edelbrocks you have to mess with metering rods and the like...for out of the box performance buy whatever carb you like...I like my Holleys and now my Barry Grant Mighty Demon 825 cfm for tuneability...it seems that you can dial these carbs in a bit easier when making changes...I have had Holleys for years and been tuning for people for just as long...Does this mean that Edelbrock makes a bad carb? No, it is just not my choice to run an edelbrock carb.

just my .02
I feel the same Holley or Barry Grant are a whole alot easier to tune..
1qwk67 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006   #20 (permalink)
blue65coupe is offline Rookie

5.0L Member


Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 25 Threads: 1
 blue65coupe's Country Flag
Hickory   North Carolina
Default

Taospec, here's the debate! You kinda have to do what I did and just choose. Your clearance will be ok. Buy a "low profile--thin" air cleaner. I had to use a spacer as my choke would hit the valve cover. So, 289 block, performer intake, 1" spacer, 600cfm carb, thin triangle shaped air cleaner. All this still gives me a whopping 1/2" max clearance from the hood. Woohoo
blue65coupe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006   #21 (permalink)
Preacher17 is offline Made Member

Classic Member
V6 Member


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,025 Threads: 50
 Preacher17's Country Flag  View Preacher17's 5 photos
Enterprise   Alabama
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taospec
I am not planning on swapping out the exhaust manifolds, unless I have to. So far, I have a custom made exhasut that is neatly attached to them, that leaks into Flowmaster 2 ch mufflers, and the Edlebrock carb, w/ spacer. My cousin advised me to keep the spacer on even after I get the manifold. Is that a good idea?
You need to rethink keeping the stock exhaust manifolds you are really killing your power potential by keeping them. Ford heads suck on the exhaust side due to small valves and ports and the stock manifolds only add to the problem as they are VERY restrictive. I've met more than a few folks who for one reason or another don't want to go with headers, fine, but you really need to do something because otherwise you're choking your motor. The best solution if you won't go with headers is swapping in a set of Hi-Po exhaust manifolds, not as good as headers but WAY better than the stock manifolds. Another choice is a set of 351W exaust manifolds which flow better than the stockers and are a bit cheaper than the Hi-Po manifolds, either way you really need to do something or all the work you are doing on the intake side won't mean a thing. Air and fuel has to get in but exhaust also needs to get out if you want to make power, it needs to be in balance, working on one end and not the other will defeat the purpose of your build and leave you disappointed with the performance of your car.

The spacer won't be necessary with the Performer RPM or Stealth if you go with just the Performer it may make a bit of a differance. Try it with then without see if there is a difference I doubt that you will notice one.

Hood clearance should not be a problem with the manifolds mentioned. The Airgap sits higher to provide air underneath the plenum and so the hood interference problems. That's not an issue with the Weiand or Edelbrock Performer or Performer RPM.
Preacher17 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009   #22 (permalink)
metalicaman8 is offline Rookie


Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1 Threads: 0
 metalicaman8's Country Flag
Bloomfield Hills   Michigan
Default

Hi guys I'm new here and I was just looking for some basic information about intake manifolds. For a base of reference my car is:
1983 mustang glx 5.0L convertable
650 cfm edelbrock aftermarket
5 speed manual
custom 3.5" dual exhaust to a set of aftermarket headers with turndown tips behind front seats
barracuda head? (i'm not 100% sure about this)
70mm throttle body

The car is mostly a recreational street car but I do like to track it occasionally. I wanted to upgrade the intake but I don't know anything about intake manifolds and want to get some basic information and any suggestions on which one I should get.
metalicaman8 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2009   #23 (permalink)
shagadoodle is offline Made Member

Classic Member


Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 323 Threads: 45
 shagadoodle's Country Flag  View shagadoodle's 7 photos
Knoxville   Tennessee
Default

i personally like the air gap bc its got such good feedback but clearance is a big issue and if ur worried about that the performer 302 would be fine.
shagadoodle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
98 Intake Manifold reivaxtorres 4.6L Tech 21 10-24-2006 01:05 PM
which intake manifold Mpyrch 94-95 Tech 2 08-28-2006 05:44 PM
Intake manifold crack pogues121 Mustang Lounge 3 08-06-2006 05:38 PM
Intake Manifold Crack pogues121 5.0L Tech 2 08-02-2006 04:59 PM
Head and Intake manifold question Stang2787 5.0L Talk 4 05-29-2006 04:27 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112