AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustang > Classic Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Classic Talk | Classic Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 07-04-2009   #76 (permalink)
Veronica is offline Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,985 Threads: 70
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thetvirus View Post
Is it possible to know the exact day the car rolled off the line based on all the date codes on different parts of the car? The codes on my car range from June 18 to June 23. Makes me wonder exactly how fast they put these cars together, like it took 5 days to get this car all together... or what?
Hi again. The short version of the answer would be ' No, there isn't.' The scheduled production date can be ball-parked within a day or two based on the sequential number of the VIN, but, the day that your car actually rolled off the line is lost forever without some original factory invoices.

As far as how long it took them to build the car goes, not long. . I saw a short film of Martha and the Vandellas going through the Ford factory in Dearborn while singing Dancing in the Streets. Sort of the sixties version of music videos. In the two minutes and thirty eight seconds it took to sing that song, Ford built a 65 Mustang convertible. The girls were following the car from start to finish, and Ford built the car quicker than they could sing the song.
Veronica is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009   #77 (permalink)
soccer1061287 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 26 Threads: 8
 soccer1061287's Country Flag
Belleville   Michigan
Default

Veronica - First of all, let me thank you for sharing such detailed information. Secondly, my 65 coupe built in april of 65 has natural color hood hinges and my info says this is correct. Can you confirm this?
soccer1061287 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009   #78 (permalink)
Veronica is offline Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,985 Threads: 70
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Hi again. They stopped painting the hood hinges gloss black at the end of the 64 model year, so, yes, your car would have had the natural looking hood hinges.
Veronica is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2009   #79 (permalink)
Sleevepin is offline Rookie


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1 Threads: 0
 Sleevepin's Country Flag
Murrieta   California
Question 64 1/2 Side Mirror

Looking for help with the correct outside Mirror for a 1964 ½ Mustang convertible. I have attached pictures for you to view the two mirrors I have. The mirror on the left came off a 64 mustang that I have but has a Falcon part number the mirror on the right I think is an aftermarket.

heres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-picture_01.jpgheres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-picture_02.jpgheres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-picture_03.jpgheres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-picture_04.jpg
heres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-picture_05.jpgheres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-picture_06.jpgheres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-picture_07.jpgheres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-picture_08.jpg






Last edited by CathyHalliday; 07-22-2009 at 12:17 PM. Reason: Remove url link for Pictures
Sleevepin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2009   #80 (permalink)
JS73Droptop is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 10 Threads: 2
 JS73Droptop's Country Flag
Plainfield   Indiana
Default

I am overly impressed with Veronica's knowledge. Would love to read what she knows, or has documentation on about 71-73 Mustangs.
__________________
Current Blue Oval Collection:
'73 Mustang Convertible-w.i.p.

'94 Crown Vic LX-daily driver

Gone but never forgotten:

1981 Fox-body hatchback(my first car)
JS73Droptop is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2009   #81 (permalink)
Veronica is offline Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,985 Threads: 70
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Hi again, That's very nice of you. to say that. I have almost nothing on the 71-73 cars. But, the original production records on those cars are still available at ::Marti Auto Works - 1955 - 1989 Ford Parts

On the rearview mirror thing, many of the earlier cars did seem to have come with the Falcon rearview mirror, but, it isn't considered to be correct. There could have been some supply issues very early on.
Veronica is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009   #82 (permalink)
jbmac64half is offline Rookie


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5 Threads: 1
 jbmac64half's Country Flag
st bonifacius   Minnesota
Default thanks Veronica

and everyone else. I just joined and have learned so much already. I have a 64 1/2 convert. out of Dearborn (July 1964) with less than 10K original miles. I am trying to figure out how original/authentic my car is. The previous owner, an elderly gentleman & 2nd owner of the car, thinks it has most original components as it was in such great shape when he restored it in the mid 80's.

It has a 289 D code, generator, with original panels, eng/trans, distributer, carb, interior etc. How do I validate or prove this? Did they stamp all panels/doors/hood/trunk with a number. Where do I find this if it exists?

Veronica, what exactly were you talking about with the hood being unfinished, please explain? Also, my passenger seat is adjustable. Could that have possibly been done in Dearborn in July 1964? I heard this was not a 64 1/2 option.

A few other questions I have. What were the original floor mats that came with a 64 1/2 Mustang Convert.? I need some and I have seen so many different ones in these cars. What was the original color for the air filter cover and valve covers (mine are silver valve & open chrome for air which I know are not original or correct)? I also need the backing for the hood letter "D" and a windshield wiper fluid cap. Any ideas on where to get parts for a car this old would be greatly appreciated. I assume I have to buy reproductions? And finally, what is the differance between a 64 1/2 and a 65 radio?

Thanks again for any help in identifying the authenticity of my 64 1/2. Sorry for the long post.

Joe

Last edited by jbmac64half; 10-13-2009 at 07:52 PM. Reason: thought of something else
jbmac64half is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #83 (permalink)
Veronica is offline Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,985 Threads: 70
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Hi again. Here are the floor mat possibilities for your car, jbmac64half.
The Care and Feeding of Ponies: Floor Mats
Your passenger side seat is supposed to be adjustable. They quit doing the non-adjustable seat somewhere around may 1st. Your valve covers and breather assembly should be gold with a black snorkel on the breather. This should help with verifying the sheet metal and stuff.
The Care and Feeding of Ponies: Date codes
The Care and Feeding of Ponies: Motor identification
As far as the hood goes, your car should have the same hood that mine does. Here are a couple of pictures. The lip shown in the pictures was folded all the way under, like the rest of the front edge, on the cars built after sometime in early to mid august.
On the radios, there were two different manufacturers used by Ford. The 64 1/2s got the radios built by either Bendix or Motorola. You can tell them apart by looking at the location of the number 10 on the dial. On the Bendix radios, the 10 is to the right of the O in Ford. The Motorola radios have the 10 to the left of the O. On both of these, the dial starts with the number 6. Sometime in mid august Ford started using the Philco radios in the Mustangs, which have a dial that starts with the number 5. Hope that helps.
Attached Thumbnails
heres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-hood-lip-1.jpg  heres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-hood-lip-4.jpg  
Veronica is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #84 (permalink)
jbmac64half is offline Rookie


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5 Threads: 1
 jbmac64half's Country Flag
st bonifacius   Minnesota
Default

Thanks Veronica. good info.
How about telling if my panels/doors/hood/trunk are original. Did they stamp or code these in any way. How would I locate this and what exactly am I looking for?

Thanks again, Joe
jbmac64half is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009   #85 (permalink)
Veronica is offline Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,985 Threads: 70
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Hi again. There are date codes stamped on the sheet metal stuff. On the doors, you have to remove the door panel to see it. On the hood, it's down near the driver's side hood hinge. On the fenders, it's on the lip under the hood where the row of six bolts is. These dates should be consistant with the scheduled production date of the car.
Attached Thumbnails
heres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-fender-date.jpg  heres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-hood-date.jpg  heres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-trunk-date.jpg  heres-why-people-call-them-64-1-2-door-date-code.jpg  
Veronica is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #86 (permalink)
aj cates is offline Rookie


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6 Threads: 1
 aj cates's Country Flag  View aj cates's 2 photos
memphis   Tennessee
Default

great stuff i just got a 65 fastback and it was produced sometime in 64 i dont have vin with me but will check back i always wounderd why they had this argument it sounds like we got a good one going now
aj cates is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #87 (permalink)
biglizard45 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5 Threads: 1
 biglizard45's Country Flag
Tulsa   Oklahoma
Default

Hey, I'm new to all this I've got one that has 1964 on the title. By the vin # it was produced in October 1964 (I think) as I read through this thread I find some of the stuff a 1964 would have and some of the stuff a 1965 would have....I'm so confused.
biglizard45 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #88 (permalink)
Veronica is offline Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,985 Threads: 70
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biglizard45 View Post
Hey, I'm new to all this I've got one that has 1964 on the title. By the vin # it was produced in October 1964 (I think) as I read through this thread I find some of the stuff a 1964 would have and some of the stuff a 1965 would have....I'm so confused.
Hello.

No Mustang should have a 64 title. If it now has one, someone at the dmv made a mistake. Your VIN starts with a 5, and that means that it should be titled as a 65 model car. If it was built in october, that's waaay into the normal 65 model year. They started building the 6-bolt, alternator cars in like early august.
Veronica is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #89 (permalink)
biglizard45 is offline Rookie

Classic Member


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5 Threads: 1
 biglizard45's Country Flag
Tulsa   Oklahoma
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veronica View Post
Hello.

No Mustang should have a 64 title. If it now has one, someone at the dmv made a mistake. Your VIN starts with a 5, and that means that it should be titled as a 65 model car. If it was built in october, that's waaay into the normal 65 model year. They started building the 6-bolt, alternator cars in like early august.

Hello to you too

That seems to be what Im finding. Yes the vin starts with 5 and theres even a "65A" on the door jam plate.....but the title says 1964 Ford Mustang. It's not even 1964 1/2 just 1964. Leave it to me...eh?
Lizzy
biglizard45 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #90 (permalink)
Veronica is offline Top Dog

Classic Member


Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,985 Threads: 70
 Veronica's Country Flag  View Veronica's 30 photos  View Veronica's HomePage
Houston   Texas
Default

Hi again.
The 65A just means that it's a Mustang coupe with standard interior. That designation was used over several year models. A 65 convertible would say 76A there, and a fastback would say 63A. It has nothing to do with year model. Purely coincidental. If the car came with a bench seat it would be 65C, and, if it was a slightly later car, as in after late february of 65 it would have been 65B if it had come with the Interior Decor Group ( pony interior)
Veronica is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
people are heartless drummasterj85 4.6L Talk 25 02-27-2009 08:48 AM
WTF: Is it with people wanting to buy mustangs Scootro Mustang Lounge 10 07-21-2006 04:55 PM
yay for people. mustang_fairy Mustang Lounge 7 06-22-2006 06:38 PM
What's up Mustang people Eetu 05 Introductions 3 06-09-2006 08:40 PM
Why the 2005 should be introduced as a 2004 1/2 Adam94GT 2005+ Talk 32 01-23-2004 02:04 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110