AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Racing Forums > Drag Racing
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
 
Lounge | Mustang Tech | Power Adders | Drag Racing | Road Racing | Audio & Alarms | Show & Shine | Tech 
 

Reply
 
Old 03-07-2009   #1 (permalink)
418wstroker is offline Apprentice


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 120 Threads: 8
 418wstroker's Country Flag  View 418wstroker's 6 photos
Howell   New Jersey
Default Predictions anyone???

Hey guys,

I am hoping some people with track experience can give me a better idea of what my car is capable of. First time to the track today (was only able to run twice) and the best run I had was the following:

60' ... 2.551
330 ... 5.948
1/8 ... 8.655
MPH ... 90.97
1000 ... 10.998
1/4 ... 13.036
MPH ... 109.03

I was just pedal breaking it off the line and had horrible traction issues. Not realizing my tire pressure was WAY too high it was at 34 PSI on MT ET Streets (255's). I was told to bring that pressure down to like 15-17 PSI and it would run a hell of a lot better. Anyway, I was shifting at 5500 (I am switching out my 6k pill for a 7k and will be shifting at 6500 next time). Any ideas what my car will be able to run with traction and higher shifting?????? Thanks guys.
418wstroker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2009   #2 (permalink)
RLG34750 is offline Forums Moderator

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 15,484 Threads: 472
 RLG34750's Country Flag  View RLG34750's 43 photos  View RLG34750's 2 classified ads  View RLG34750's HomePage
Palm Bay   Florida
Send a message via Yahoo to RLG34750
Default

well based on the 1/4 mph it should be it be running low 12's to high 11's

not to sugar coated the 60' is bad....

if i wasn't a mod i'd say your 60' sucked.....
(not suppose to say things like that..)


get that car to hook and it will fly.....
__________________
Reggie

Real Racers Don't Street Race

PERIOD.......

'88 LX Hatch With A Little Of This & A Little Of That......
10.39 @128 MPH Soon to be faster....
RLG34750 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2009   #3 (permalink)
roostracing is offline Apprentice


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 144 Threads: 11
 roostracing's Country Flag  View roostracing's 22 photos
South   Texas
Default

yup...that 109mph is good for about a 12.2...that 60 SUCKS...and the 1/8th really sucks....

your mph is AWESOME....sooooo...lower that tire pressure...launch that car hard...and shift on time...you should have a 1.5-1.6 60 ft.....a 1/8th in the 7's....go back out there and good luck!
__________________
TRICKED OUT RACING
1991 Mustang LX Coupe
13.12 @ 101.3 mph (stock uncracked motor)
Best 60 ft 1.64
roostracing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #4 (permalink)
jakksincorpse is offline Made Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 284 Threads: 34
 jakksincorpse's Country Flag
574   Indiana
Default 109mph for 12.2?

i got a v6 2001 with a few mods and i hit about 12.3-12.6 in a quarter....but i deff dont hit 109mph... more like 125mph to 130mph... honestly i have always hated mustangs til i got this one. v8's are overrated. i love killin those gt's and still getting 420 miles to tha tank!!! =D
jakksincorpse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #5 (permalink)
418wstroker is offline Apprentice


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 120 Threads: 8
 418wstroker's Country Flag  View 418wstroker's 6 photos
Howell   New Jersey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlg34750 View Post
well based on the 1/4 mph it should be it be running low 12's to high 11's

not to sugar coated the 60' is bad....

if i wasn't a mod i'd say your 60' sucked.....
(not suppose to say things like that..)


get that car to hook and it will fly.....
ha ha yeah I can't sugar coat that 60' either...I know it was pretty bad thanks for the predictions!

Quote:
Originally Posted by roostracing View Post
yup...that 109mph is good for about a 12.2...that 60 SUCKS...and the 1/8th really sucks....

your mph is AWESOME....sooooo...lower that tire pressure...launch that car hard...and shift on time...you should have a 1.5-1.6 60 ft.....a 1/8th in the 7's....go back out there and good luck!
Thanks man.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakksincorpse View Post
i got a v6 2001 with a few mods and i hit about 12.3-12.6 in a quarter....but i deff dont hit 109mph... more like 125mph to 130mph... honestly i have always hated mustangs til i got this one. v8's are overrated. i love killin those gt's and still getting 420 miles to tha tank!!! =D
A 2001 v6 with a few mods and you are running 125 MPH for your 1/4 mile???? What do you have done to it?
418wstroker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #6 (permalink)
roostracing is offline Apprentice


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 144 Threads: 11
 roostracing's Country Flag  View roostracing's 22 photos
South   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakksincorpse View Post
i got a v6 2001 with a few mods and i hit about 12.3-12.6 in a quarter....but i deff dont hit 109mph... more like 125mph to 130mph... honestly i have always hated mustangs til i got this one. v8's are overrated. i love killin those gt's and still getting 420 miles to tha tank!!! =D
V8's overrated? dont think so...

your mph is good for 10 second passes....turbo? supercharger? nirtous? You definately have a power adder to run that mph...

but 12.3-12.6 in the 1/4 isnt going to kill ANY V8 with a poweradder...

i'm sure your car isnt hooking at all
__________________
TRICKED OUT RACING
1991 Mustang LX Coupe
13.12 @ 101.3 mph (stock uncracked motor)
Best 60 ft 1.64
roostracing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #7 (permalink)
RLG34750 is offline Forums Moderator

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 15,484 Threads: 472
 RLG34750's Country Flag  View RLG34750's 43 photos  View RLG34750's 2 classified ads  View RLG34750's HomePage
Palm Bay   Florida
Send a message via Yahoo to RLG34750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakksincorpse View Post
i got a v6 2001 with a few mods and i hit about 12.3-12.6 in a quarter....but i deff dont hit 109mph... more like 125mph to 130mph... honestly i have always hated mustangs til i got this one. v8's are overrated. i love killin those gt's and still getting 420 miles to tha tank!!! =D

Please note the highlighted part of your post.....

as a rule I am a very diplomatic person but in your case i will make an exception.....

i will throw the BS FLAG

the last time I was at the track my car ran 10.43 @ 126 mph

so you expect me to belive you ran a 12.3 @ 130 mph.....

so if you are going to bring something to the table please make it honesty....
__________________
Reggie

Real Racers Don't Street Race

PERIOD.......

'88 LX Hatch With A Little Of This & A Little Of That......
10.39 @128 MPH Soon to be faster....
RLG34750 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #8 (permalink)
mmb617 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 567 Threads: 22
 mmb617's Country Flag  View mmb617's 15 photos
Altoona   Pennsylvania
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rlg34750 View Post
Please note the highlighted part of your post.....

as a rule I am a very diplomatic person but in your case i will make an exception.....

i will throw the BS FLAG

the last time I was at the track my car ran 10.43 @ 126 mph

so you expect me to belive you ran a 12.3 @ 130 mph.....

so if you are going to bring something to the table please make it honesty....
Ha, ha, you beat me to it! As I'm reading this post I'm thinking "Holy major BS batman, who's this guy think he's talking to?" At least try to make the story you tell somewhat believable.

To the OP, what's your combo? There's probably a lot more in it than what's indicated from the little info we have here. My thoughts are as follows:

109 mph in the quarter says low 12's should be possible.

However you ran nearly 91 mph in the eighth. Most cars pick up 25-26 mph from the 1/8 to the 1/4, which would give you 116-117 mph for the 1/4 which should be mid 11's. I don't know why you didn't pick up more speed on the big end. Something 'aint right there. I run 89 mph in the eighth and 117 in the quarter.

Traction issues don't have a lot of effect on trap speed so that's why I'm looking at it as an indicator of potential.

One other way to look at potential. It's been said that every tenth you can improve your 60 will show up as 2 tenths improvement in et. This seems about right to me. Going by that, if you take your 2.551 60 and shave it to a more reasonable 1.7, those 8 tenths better 60 will be 1.6 seconds improvement in et which would then give you an et of around 11.4

We can toss numbers around till the cows come home but the bottom line is there is a lot left in your car.
__________________
OFR - old fart racing

We're not the fastest car at the track but we might be having the most fun.

If you're not having fun, then you're taking this stuff too seriously!
mmb617 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #9 (permalink)
jakksincorpse is offline Made Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 284 Threads: 34
 jakksincorpse's Country Flag
574   Indiana
Default

friends friends. there is no bs.

haha i kinda forgot to mention i never wanted to drop my tranny so i dont spin out starting. cuz i dont think the t5 tranny's can withstand torque over 300 lbs.. which i have somewhere around 310lbs

and all i got is the cai, full magnaflow exhaust, a predator tuner, and a few pounds taken out of the car...around 160lbs.

BUT. i have a question. i have stock 19lbs fuel injectors..(i think) with out forced air induction how much of a hp boost would i get with 30lb jectors?? (i dont have enough cash for a 3000 dollar supercharger)

idk. but i dont want anyone to think im an idiot. but thats why i ran low 12's actually i asked about is it possible to swap out the t5 tranny on my v6 for a t56 like a corvette or viper tranny.

no one has responded on it so if you wanna be awesome in my book and answer it i would be very greatful.
jakksincorpse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #10 (permalink)
mmb617 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 567 Threads: 22
 mmb617's Country Flag  View mmb617's 15 photos
Altoona   Pennsylvania
Default

So what we have here is a basically stock V6 with well over 500 hp, since that's what's needed to run 125+ in the quarter with a 3200 lb car.

Nah, I don't see any BS there!

On a more serious note, why do you want the T56, they're pretty pricey you know. Personally I will go with a G-force T5 when I feel the need to upgrade my transmission. A lot of guys use the TKO's too. Unless your heart is set on a 6 speed and you have the cash, I think there are better options.
__________________
OFR - old fart racing

We're not the fastest car at the track but we might be having the most fun.

If you're not having fun, then you're taking this stuff too seriously!
mmb617 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #11 (permalink)
jakksincorpse is offline Made Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 284 Threads: 34
 jakksincorpse's Country Flag
574   Indiana
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmb617 View Post
So what we have here is a basically stock V6 with well over 500 hp, since that's what's needed to run 125+ in the quarter with a 3200 lb car.

Nah, I don't see any BS there!

On a more serious note, why do you want the T56, they're pretty pricey you know. Personally I will go with a G-force T5 when I feel the need to upgrade my transmission. A lot of guys use the TKO's too. Unless your heart is set on a 6 speed and you have the cash, I think there are better options.
275rwhp 318rwt

and i just weighed the car in at 2942lbs

my car is a lil over 10 pounds per horse, you dont need 500hp to do a 125mph. seeing that a corvette z06 has 505hp and does a quarter in 5.7 secs.

trust me i use to drive a first gen talon tsi awd. that had 260bhp and since it was all wheel drive i cranked mid-high nines in a quarter.

and for the tranny i never checked any others than the t56 i just saw that the cobras used them so i thought why not.

the t56 im looking at is 1300 dollars. whats the g-force?
jakksincorpse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #12 (permalink)
Stoenr is offline Top Dog

S197 Member


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,585 Threads: 114
 Stoenr's Country Flag  View Stoenr's 33 photos  View Stoenr's 2 classified ads  View Stoenr's HomePage
Oak Forest   Illinois
Send a message via ICQ to Stoenr Send a message via AIM to Stoenr Send a message via Yahoo to Stoenr
Default

Lol, Oh boy here it comes
__________________
'06 Tungsten GT 18" CT-R Gunmetals
Xcal2, JLTII, UDP, ProKit, Dspecs, Bump Steer kit, O/R-H pipe, SS brake hoses, Strut Tower Brace, UCA, Adj.LCA's, AntiSquats, Panhard bar, MGW shifter, Steeda cowl hood, Hood pins, MRT hood struts*, 14" Antenna, Sequencial TL's, 07 Plenum cover, PJ Saleen heritage fascia, CDC ductail, SSE 1/4 window louvers, MAG mirror inserts, Rear trunk painted, MGW window switch plates, Billet door lock pins, Tint.
Stoenr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #13 (permalink)
418wstroker is offline Apprentice


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 120 Threads: 8
 418wstroker's Country Flag  View 418wstroker's 6 photos
Howell   New Jersey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmb617 View Post
Ha, ha, you beat me to it! As I'm reading this post I'm thinking "Holy major BS batman, who's this guy think he's talking to?" At least try to make the story you tell somewhat believable.

To the OP, what's your combo? There's probably a lot more in it than what's indicated from the little info we have here. My thoughts are as follows:

109 mph in the quarter says low 12's should be possible.

However you ran nearly 91 mph in the eighth. Most cars pick up 25-26 mph from the 1/8 to the 1/4, which would give you 116-117 mph for the 1/4 which should be mid 11's. I don't know why you didn't pick up more speed on the big end. Something 'aint right there. I run 89 mph in the eighth and 117 in the quarter.

Traction issues don't have a lot of effect on trap speed so that's why I'm looking at it as an indicator of potential.

One other way to look at potential. It's been said that every tenth you can improve your 60 will show up as 2 tenths improvement in et. This seems about right to me. Going by that, if you take your 2.551 60 and shave it to a more reasonable 1.7, those 8 tenths better 60 will be 1.6 seconds improvement in et which would then give you an et of around 11.4

We can toss numbers around till the cows come home but the bottom line is there is a lot left in your car.
mmb617, that's a lot of great info...I really appreciate it.

Yeah, I def. think my top end is suffering. I can't remember if I hit the rev limiter before finishing (I am pretty sure I did), but I do know I was shifting around ~5800 and the motor is supposed to shift at 6500...so I am just waiting on my 7k pill. The guy who built the motor for me seems to think that 112 MPH is about the most I will get out of it because the top end of that motor isn't the best compared to the low end power it's making. Also, I have a crumby 9" air filter on there due to hood clearance issues so I am sure that doesn't help any.

Here's the specs:

'88 LX
418w stroker 10.7:1
Twisted Wedge heads
1.7 rocker arms
Mild cam
770 CFM Holley carb
Power steering, pullied water pump, C4 transmission (3400 stall - full manual valve body), 4.10 gears
418wstroker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #14 (permalink)
mmb617 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 567 Threads: 22
 mmb617's Country Flag  View mmb617's 15 photos
Altoona   Pennsylvania
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakksincorpse View Post
275rwhp 318rwt

and i just weighed the car in at 2942lbs

my car is a lil over 10 pounds per horse, you dont need 500hp to do a 125mph. seeing that a corvette z06 has 505hp and does a quarter in 5.7 secs.

trust me i use to drive a first gen talon tsi awd. that had 260bhp and since it was all wheel drive i cranked mid-high nines in a quarter.

and for the tranny i never checked any others than the t56 i just saw that the cobras used them so i thought why not.

the t56 im looking at is 1300 dollars. whats the g-force?
I'm not sure why I'm arguing with you other than it's a rainy day, my car's as ready as it's going to get for track opening day, and I'm bored.

At any rate a 2942 lb car with 275 rwhp will never hit 125, or anything close to it in 1/4 mile, from a standing start. I don't think you'll find anybody who will debate this.

A Corvette does the quarter in 5.7 seconds? Now I know you're just kidding about this one. It couldn't come close to doing the 1/8 in that time.

Then there's 260 hp and mid-high nines in the quarter. That car better not weigh more than 1200 lbs with driver. Are you sure you're not talking about a bike here? A 260 hp bike could do it.

I'm guessing that you're either a troll just looking to stir up something, which is fine, I'm bored too, or you really don't know anything about cars and racing.

Oh, and a G-force T5 is an upgraded version with better shafts and gears. They can also be ordered with a stronger case. The main advantage is they are a direct replacement for a regular T5.
__________________
OFR - old fart racing

We're not the fastest car at the track but we might be having the most fun.

If you're not having fun, then you're taking this stuff too seriously!
mmb617 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2009   #15 (permalink)
mmb617 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 567 Threads: 22
 mmb617's Country Flag  View mmb617's 15 photos
Altoona   Pennsylvania
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 418wstroker View Post
mmb617, that's a lot of great info...I really appreciate it.

Yeah, I def. think my top end is suffering. I can't remember if I hit the rev limiter before finishing (I am pretty sure I did), but I do know I was shifting around ~5800 and the motor is supposed to shift at 6500...so I am just waiting on my 7k pill. The guy who built the motor for me seems to think that 112 MPH is about the most I will get out of it because the top end of that motor isn't the best compared to the low end power it's making. Also, I have a crumby 9" air filter on there due to hood clearance issues so I am sure that doesn't help any.

Here's the specs:

'88 LX
418w stroker 10.7:1
Twisted Wedge heads
1.7 rocker arms
Mild cam
770 CFM Holley carb
Power steering, pullied water pump, C4 transmission (3400 stall - full manual valve body), 4.10 gears
Oh good, some intelligent conversation. I am very interested in talking to you because our combos are fairly similar. Perhaps we can help each other. As far as a comparison of our cars goes:

I have an '85 GT which is more strip than street, so it's probably lighter than your car, but maybe not that much.

I have a 393 with about the same compression, so your motor's a little bigger.

I have ProComp heads so I'm reasonably certain your twisted wedges are better heads than I have.

I also have a mild cam, it specs out to: .507 intake lift, .499 exhaust lift, 232* duration @ 0.50 intake, 236* exhaust, with a 111* LSA. I would doubt if your cam is any milder than that.

I have a Holley 750 DP carb, so similar there.

I still have the P/S and belt driven water pump too.

I run a T5 with 3.73 gears.

So in looking over the differences between our cars the advantage goes to you in just about every comparison. That means you should be able to run faster times than me. I was running high 11's at the end of last year with a bone stock rear suspension which was keeping me from any kind of decent launch, the best I could do was 1.7's. Since I upgraded my suspension over the winter I fully expect to run mid 11's this year. You should be faster than that.

I'm not sure why your builder thinks that 112 mph is all you can do with that combo. What's the limiting factor? These big strokers don't need to wind up real high to make good power. I have found through experimentation that although my motor will easily wind to 6k, there's no power up that high. I run the best times when I shift at 5500. I go through the traps at 117 and I'm turning about 5600-5700. With your 4.10 gears if you can cross the stripe at 6500 you should be around 120 or so, which is flirting with the 10's.

What intake are you running? I have a vic jr and I believe it will flow all I'll ever need. The weak point in my combo is the heads. If I could afford better heads and cam I feel sure I'd run 10's and like I said before, you have a stronger combo overall than I do.

Are you running the drag radial version of the M/T et streets? I don't know why they call the radial and bias ply version by the same name, that always confuses me. I run the M/T drag radials in a 2.55/60/15 and usually run them at 18 lbs. I tried lower pressures, but 18 seems to be the magic number for me.

If you think the air filter is hurting you why not try pulling it at the track? Maybe your lack of top end grunt is something as simple as that.

What kind of suspension do you have under your car? Good suspension pieces will help you hook, but seat time is probably your biggest friend right now. With practice you should be able to knock a lot off your 60 time even if your suspension is stock since you already have some decent tires.

You're at the point right now where every trip to the track you will see big improvements. Keep at it and you'll be running some good numbers in no time.
__________________
OFR - old fart racing

We're not the fastest car at the track but we might be having the most fun.

If you're not having fun, then you're taking this stuff too seriously!
mmb617 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Horsepower predictions. 905mustang 5.0L Tech 2 11-16-2008 02:54 PM
Recommendations, Predictions and Suggestions John10 2005-2009 Mustang GT Tech 2 04-27-2008 05:58 PM
Dyno number predictions? fobra559 4.6L Talk 16 03-18-2008 05:24 PM
Mustang II with 351 Windsor. Any 1/4 mile predictions? Cobra351W Mustang II Talk 4 01-01-2007 05:40 PM
Bowl Game Predictions again.... rj8806 Mustang Lounge 3 12-20-2006 02:00 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112