AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Racing Forums > Drag Racing
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
 
Lounge | Mustang Tech | Power Adders | Drag Racing | Road Racing | Audio & Alarms | Show & Shine | Tech 
 

Reply
 
Old 03-11-2009   #1 (permalink)
895.0LX is offline Apprentice

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 242 Threads: 75
 895.0LX's Country Flag
Derry   New Hampshire
Default slicks on stock 5.0?

is it stupid to put slicks on a stock 5.0? i hear all kinds of different opions. some people say thats one of the first things you should get to get your 1/4 times down a good amount and other people say there is no need for them on a stock 5.0 stang. can someone let me know if its dumb or not? i dont know if this matters but its a 89 5.0 lx 5 speed. thanks
895.0LX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #2 (permalink)
302Feen is online now Top Dog

5.0L Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,671 Threads: 194
 302Feen's Country Flag  View 302Feen's 71 photos  View 302Feen's 1 classified ad
Norman   Oklahoma
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 895.0LX View Post
is it stupid to put slicks on a stock 5.0? i hear all kinds of different opions. some people say thats one of the first things you should get to get your 1/4 times down a good amount and other people say there is no need for them on a stock 5.0 stang. can someone let me know if its dumb or not? i dont know if this matters but its a 89 5.0 lx 5 speed. thanks
You don't need full drag slicks on a stock or even mildly built 5.0. What you WOULD want is a set of drag radials... Mickey Thompson, Nitto, BFG just to name a few...
__________________
-1994 Mustang GT... K&N filter,GT40 tubular intake,BBK Full Length Headers,modified midpipe & Flowmaster muffs, timing at 12*. Best time- 14.74 @ 93.16
-Check profile for pics of our car collection!
-Member of MBMCustoms Car Club
- AmericanMuscle ROCKS!!
- "Save a horse, drive a Mustang!"
302Feen is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #3 (permalink)
roostracing is offline Apprentice


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 144 Threads: 11
 roostracing's Country Flag  View roostracing's 22 photos
South   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 895.0LX View Post
is it stupid to put slicks on a stock 5.0? i hear all kinds of different opions. some people say thats one of the first things you should get to get your 1/4 times down a good amount and other people say there is no need for them on a stock 5.0 stang. can someone let me know if its dumb or not? i dont know if this matters but its a 89 5.0 lx 5 speed. thanks
slicks is one of the first things i buy to improve my et's...i recommend some 3.73's to take advantage of the launch....

it is NOT a bad idea...some may argue about having your rear end built for a hard launch on slicks...mine is built BUT ive launched many cars on stock rear ends with no problems at all on slicks (87-93 5.0 cars...they have a narrower rear end compared to other year models)...look at my time in signature
__________________
TRICKED OUT RACING
1991 Mustang LX Coupe
13.12 @ 101.3 mph (stock uncracked motor)
Best 60 ft 1.64
roostracing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #4 (permalink)
rj8806 is offline Senior Member

4.6L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,924 Threads: 95
 rj8806's Country Flag  View rj8806's 16 photos  View rj8806's HomePage
Knoxville   Tennessee
Default

While slicks will improve your E.T., you will break something on a stock setup. Slicks are made to bite. Bite creates shockload throughout the drivetrain. Shockload is what breaks stuff. On a stock 5.0, the u-joints are on it are a 1310 which is rated at 400ft/lbs. The T5 5 speed(assuming you are a 5 speed), is rated at best, 300 ft/lbs. When slicks bite and shockload goes up thru the driveline, something is going to break. It may not happen on the first launch or even the 2nd one, but it does weaken parts like the u-joints and tranny on just the first launch. Eventually, you will break something.

If you are planning on running full racing slicks, you really need to beef up the rear end, axles, u-joints and transmission to prevent possible breakage. Drag radials are a better option, IMO. They bite harder than street tires but not as hard as full on racing slicks. The chances of breaking something due to shock load on drag radials are diminished as compared to wrinkle wall slicks.


Good Luck.




Richard
Tech Support
Tremec TKO, T45 & T56 Transmission Systems
__________________
Self Proclaimed "Resident Manual Tranny/Driveline Guru"

Obamacare my a$$ We are all going to pay for electing this tool.

Remember, it is almost impossible for anyone, myself included, to diagnose a problem over the internet without seeing the car. My advice is simply that, advice based on years of experience. I don't want you or anyone taking my word as gospel. I am trying to give some direction as to what I think may be happening.
rj8806 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #5 (permalink)
RLG34750 is offline Forums Moderator

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 15,623 Threads: 473
 RLG34750's Country Flag  View RLG34750's 43 photos  View RLG34750's 2 classified ads  View RLG34750's HomePage
Palm Bay   Florida
Send a message via Yahoo to RLG34750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 895.0LX View Post
is it stupid to put slicks on a stock 5.0? i hear all kinds of different opions. some people say thats one of the first things you should get to get your 1/4 times down a good amount and other people say there is no need for them on a stock 5.0 stang. can someone let me know if its dumb or not? i dont know if this matters but its a 89 5.0 lx 5 speed. thanks

I would not advice using slicks on a stock vehicle....

primarily because the stock parts are not capble of handling the driveline shock which equals broken axles....

my advice would be go with a drag radial......
__________________
Reggie

Real Racers Don't Street Race

PERIOD.......

'88 LX Hatch With A Little Of This & A Little Of That......
10.39 @128 MPH Soon to be faster....
RLG34750 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #6 (permalink)
895.0LX is offline Apprentice

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 242 Threads: 75
 895.0LX's Country Flag
Derry   New Hampshire
Default

ok great thanks a lot guys. how much will will i pick up in the 1/4 mile with drag radials?
895.0LX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009   #7 (permalink)
Doc_G is offline Rookie

5.0L Member


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 28 Threads: 2
 Doc_G's Country Flag
Birmingham   Alabama
Send a message via AIM to Doc_G
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 895.0LX View Post
ok great thanks a lot guys. how much will will i pick up in the 1/4 mile with drag radials?

Depends on how well the track is prepped, how well you heat them up, and what air pressure you plan on running them at.
__________________
'88 GT Hatch, Pretty much stock.
Underdrive crank pulley, 8mm wires, bumped base timing, stock airbox/silencer delete.
Doc_G is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009   #8 (permalink)
895.0LX is offline Apprentice

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 242 Threads: 75
 895.0LX's Country Flag
Derry   New Hampshire
Default

can we just say everything is like average? or is there no real telling untill you just do it
895.0LX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009   #9 (permalink)
rugedraw is offline Apprentice


Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 152 Threads: 2
 rugedraw's Country Flag  View rugedraw's 23 photos
Miami   Florida
Default

I've launched plenty of foxes on slicks with a stock rear with just a gear swap and had no problems. I would just reinforce the torque boxes; asides from that, you should be good to go until you are making a lot of power.
__________________
'05 Legend Lime Mustang GT (Steeda CAI, UDP's, BamaChips 93 octane tune, ceramic headers, o/r h-pipe, FlowMaster axle-backs, 3.73 gears, alum. f/w, CHE brace w/ torq. lmtrs, UCA & LCA's, many exterior mods)
rugedraw is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009   #10 (permalink)
roostracing is offline Apprentice


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 144 Threads: 11
 roostracing's Country Flag  View roostracing's 22 photos
South   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugedraw View Post
I've launched plenty of foxes on slicks with a stock rear with just a gear swap and had no problems. I would just reinforce the torque boxes; asides from that, you should be good to go until you are making a lot of power.

i agree with ya...ive raced fox bodies with full slicks....5k launches...stock rears....NEVER broke anything or seen one break...my cousin had an 88 gt with a 347...stock rear with 4.30's...went 12.2's on 5k launches and NEVER broke...350 rwhp

if it was a 99-04 stang id tell you DO NOT run slicks on stock rear end...ive seen those break all the time!!!

If you have the extra money build that rear end...if you dont i think you'll be fine...

your tranny will take a dump before your rear end will...
__________________
TRICKED OUT RACING
1991 Mustang LX Coupe
13.12 @ 101.3 mph (stock uncracked motor)
Best 60 ft 1.64
roostracing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009   #11 (permalink)
RLG34750 is offline Forums Moderator

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 15,623 Threads: 473
 RLG34750's Country Flag  View RLG34750's 43 photos  View RLG34750's 2 classified ads  View RLG34750's HomePage
Palm Bay   Florida
Send a message via Yahoo to RLG34750
Default

well i beg to differ i snapped an axle launching on slicks @ 3700 rpm

i just say slicks on a stock rear is a crap shoot.....
__________________
Reggie

Real Racers Don't Street Race

PERIOD.......

'88 LX Hatch With A Little Of This & A Little Of That......
10.39 @128 MPH Soon to be faster....
RLG34750 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009   #12 (permalink)
DRIVIN_MUSTANGS is offline Rookie

Classic Member
5.0L Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15 Threads: 1
 DRIVIN_MUSTANGS's Country Flag
Chippewa County   Michigan
Default

I ve owned 7 different foxes from 87 to 93 all with man trans and the only thing I have ever busted are transmissions. I currently use a set of goodyear slicks and I have a set of BFG Drag radials and if you want to help assure a good run every time, run slicks. You are out there beatin your car anyway, just run it and when it breaks, fix it. My 87 with 127,677 mile on it that I have now, has the following mods, Sub-frame connectors, 3.73 gears, cold air intake, and slicks. I have had to replace the input and output grear clusters 3 times in 2 years with 35 1/4 mile runs and daily drivin to boot. I also replaced U-joints every year for good measure.
__________________
65 Mustang convertible
84 Mustang GT350 Convertible VIP Edition
87 Mustang GT 5.0 Hatchback
67 Mustang Coupe fixer upper
93 Mustang LX 2.3 Turbo Notchback
DRIVIN_MUSTANGS is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009   #13 (permalink)
895.0LX is offline Apprentice

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 242 Threads: 75
 895.0LX's Country Flag
Derry   New Hampshire
Default

so it sounds to me like it doesnt matter if there slicks or just drag radials. what size slicks can i fit on my 5.0. the rims are 15's. i dont know how wide they are. normal stock size
895.0LX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009   #14 (permalink)
RLG34750 is offline Forums Moderator

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 15,623 Threads: 473
 RLG34750's Country Flag  View RLG34750's 43 photos  View RLG34750's 2 classified ads  View RLG34750's HomePage
Palm Bay   Florida
Send a message via Yahoo to RLG34750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 895.0LX View Post
so it sounds to me like it doesnt matter if there slicks or just drag radials. what size slicks can i fit on my 5.0. the rims are 15's. i dont know how wide they are. normal stock size
they are a 15 x 7

you can put a 10.5 slick on the those .....
__________________
Reggie

Real Racers Don't Street Race

PERIOD.......

'88 LX Hatch With A Little Of This & A Little Of That......
10.39 @128 MPH Soon to be faster....
RLG34750 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009   #15 (permalink)
roostracing is offline Apprentice


Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 144 Threads: 11
 roostracing's Country Flag  View roostracing's 22 photos
South   Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 895.0LX View Post
so it sounds to me like it doesnt matter if there slicks or just drag radials. what size slicks can i fit on my 5.0. the rims are 15's. i dont know how wide they are. normal stock size
id go with a slick...how wide is your wheel...is it a 15X8...if so i d recommend a 26 x 8.5 x 15 ET Drag

i have 15x10's 6.5 bs....and i'm running a 26x10x15 ET Drag

weld up your torque boxes at the very least...

mine are welded up, i have full length subframes, and managed a 1.64 60 ft like that....check out your bushings in the stock control arms and see how they look...
__________________
TRICKED OUT RACING
1991 Mustang LX Coupe
13.12 @ 101.3 mph (stock uncracked motor)
Best 60 ft 1.64
roostracing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cam for Mostly Stock 5.0 savegoodautonfg 5.0L Talk 14 01-17-2009 01:55 AM
who would win between a 1994 5.0 and a 2000 gt both completly stock? GTman07 4.6L Talk 5 09-23-2007 10:15 PM
Whats the wieght of a stock 89 5.0 gt convertible? BoardingBilly 5.0L Talk 5 09-15-2006 05:41 PM
looking to buy stock 5.0 HO cam thamende 5.0L Talk 1 09-25-2005 11:19 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112