AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Racing Forums > Drag Racing
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
 
Lounge | Mustang Tech | Power Adders | Drag Racing | Road Racing | Audio & Alarms | Show & Shine | Tech 
 

Reply
 
Old 05-31-2009   #1 (permalink)
stang93mustang is offline Made Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 900 Threads: 67
 stang93mustang's Country Flag  View stang93mustang's 12 photos  View stang93mustang's HomePage
Elgin   Illinois
Default Are all big blocks created equal?

I got into a debate with a friend of mines yesterday as he called me from the track. The debate was that he claims that if he put a 9000 rpm chip in the car it will help him out in the big end of the track. He ran out at 8000!

Here's some of his specs. Chevy 454 with some good parts (close to 16 to 1 compression). Has a powerglide trans, 4.88 gear, 9 x 29 (?)slicks, he has a low profile manifold w/ a 1150 dom carb. I tell him the manifold has to go, it is a restriction for him. He says no it's fine.

His best results that I know of which was just yesterday was a 10.70 @ 120 something MPH. His 60' was only a 1.5. He's says running 10psi in the slicks before burnout. Nothing major to his suspension besides the 12 bolt, race springs and shocks.

My thing to him is that the motor should not have to work that hard for the results he's getting. I'm saying that he should go down in gear to help compensate for that and he's insisting that no just put a bigger chip in.

He doesn't have a 25-30 grand motor built so the parts are not there to run those RPM's. Good motor but not THAT good!

Any comments on this?
__________________
Building it right from the beginning is always better than starting over to build it better because it was temporary.

93' LX hatch, 460 with mods, TH400 trans, 9" w/ 3.89 spool. Best (so far!) of 10.18 @ 131 mph with 1.39 60'

Reese,
stang93mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009   #2 (permalink)
RLG34750 is offline Forums Moderator

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 15,472 Threads: 472
 RLG34750's Country Flag  View RLG34750's 43 photos  View RLG34750's 2 classified ads  View RLG34750's HomePage
Palm Bay   Florida
Send a message via Yahoo to RLG34750
Default

i will agree with you on this

Being an old chevy BB guy turning those kind of RPM's is unheard of on a "shade tree" motor

BB Chevy's are torque monsters not rpm motors......

if he puts that chip in the motor he will be seeing his crank sooner than he expected and it will be a lovely view from the hole in the oil pan.....
__________________
Reggie

Real Racers Don't Street Race

PERIOD.......

'88 LX Hatch With A Little Of This & A Little Of That......
10.39 @128 MPH Soon to be faster....
RLG34750 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009   #3 (permalink)
stang93mustang is offline Made Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 900 Threads: 67
 stang93mustang's Country Flag  View stang93mustang's 12 photos  View stang93mustang's HomePage
Elgin   Illinois
Default

Do you think that the low rise manifold is hurting him in the 60'? He has Brodix box stock heads, so good heads plenty of carburetor but in my opinion a restrictive manifold.
__________________
Building it right from the beginning is always better than starting over to build it better because it was temporary.

93' LX hatch, 460 with mods, TH400 trans, 9" w/ 3.89 spool. Best (so far!) of 10.18 @ 131 mph with 1.39 60'

Reese,
stang93mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009   #4 (permalink)
05horse is offline Top Dog

V6 Member
S197 Member


Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,297 Threads: 224
 05horse's Country Flag  View 05horse's 51 photos  View 05horse's 1 classified ad
Centerville (communist)   Ohio
Send a message via AIM to 05horse Send a message via MSN to 05horse Send a message via Yahoo to 05horse
Default

the classic 400 BB ( 454 pre stoke. ) are` like RLG said, torqe not rpm

9K is a death sentance on that car

7 K is out of powerband i belive, as far as i know if hes useing an older 400 block, or even a newer one, the powerbands are way low.


will my trans am motor pull 5K yes, will it pull 7 K yes.


do i ever have it past 4K no

thats why my TA has like 2.56 in the rear or something like that.

classic BBs dig low RPM and they produce Monster Tq.

for 9 k rpm id start with a small block or a good tuned LS1 atleast then build it up


im not sure about the manifold, mines still stock.
__________________
i have yet to find some one else who when changing their oil ( every 2000 miles or when they get bored ) details the under side of their car.

X-C April 2010,Heads, Cam,Internals April 2011, or blown engine, witch ever comes first.
The transformation has begun!
05horse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009   #5 (permalink)
stang93mustang is offline Made Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 900 Threads: 67
 stang93mustang's Country Flag  View stang93mustang's 12 photos  View stang93mustang's HomePage
Elgin   Illinois
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 05horse View Post
the classic 400 BB ( 454 pre stoke. ) are` like RLG said, torqe not rpm

9K is a death sentance on that car

7 K is out of powerband i belive, as far as i know if hes useing an older 400 block, or even a newer one, the powerbands are way low.


will my trans am motor pull 5K yes, will it pull 7 K yes.


do i ever have it past 4K no

thats why my TA has like 2.56 in the rear or something like that.

classic BBs dig low RPM and they produce Monster Tq.

for 9 k rpm id start with a small block or a good tuned LS1 atleast then build it up


im not sure about the manifold, mines still stock.
Yes, I believe that he has way too much gear in the rear. I believe that I could even go down with my 3.89 to a 3.27-3.55 but I just changed from a 4.57!

This is a guy that seems to only listen to one person so after this thread goes dead I'm gonna print it out and give it to him!
__________________
Building it right from the beginning is always better than starting over to build it better because it was temporary.

93' LX hatch, 460 with mods, TH400 trans, 9" w/ 3.89 spool. Best (so far!) of 10.18 @ 131 mph with 1.39 60'

Reese,
stang93mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009   #6 (permalink)
KLWorra is offline Apprentice


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 114 Threads: 6
 KLWorra's Country Flag  View KLWorra's 14 photos
Lancaster   Pennsylvania
Default

Heads and Cam? I would think the cam would be the determining factor in the combo then maybe the heads. It would take a monster set of heads to feed a beast like that.

I suggest running some what if scenerios in a computer simulation like engine analyzer before going much further with the combo.

If this guy does have the heads and cam that could breathe and not float up to 9000, then surely 1050 is WAY too small. He would need about TWICE that.
KLWorra is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009   #7 (permalink)
stang93mustang is offline Made Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 900 Threads: 67
 stang93mustang's Country Flag  View stang93mustang's 12 photos  View stang93mustang's HomePage
Elgin   Illinois
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KLWorra View Post
Heads and Cam? I would think the cam would be the determining factor in the combo then maybe the heads. It would take a monster set of heads to feed a beast like that.

I suggest running some what if scenerios in a computer simulation like engine analyzer before going much further with the combo.

If this guy does have the heads and cam that could breathe and not float up to 9000, then surely 1050 is WAY too small. He would need about TWICE that.

I don't know the specs on the cam but I can say that this motor snarls really tough! Close to 16 to 1 compression, I'm sure he has adaquate heads just not a good selection on the manifold. He claims that when the motor had a tunnel ram on it from the previous owner it ran 8's. I asked then why not go back to that set up? I can't believe that a manifold could change things that much. I know there is the equasion of the vehicle weights.
__________________
Building it right from the beginning is always better than starting over to build it better because it was temporary.

93' LX hatch, 460 with mods, TH400 trans, 9" w/ 3.89 spool. Best (so far!) of 10.18 @ 131 mph with 1.39 60'

Reese,
stang93mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009   #8 (permalink)
KLWorra is offline Apprentice


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 114 Threads: 6
 KLWorra's Country Flag  View KLWorra's 14 photos
Lancaster   Pennsylvania
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stang93mustang View Post
I don't know the specs on the cam but I can say that this motor snarls really tough! Close to 16 to 1 compression, I'm sure he has adaquate heads just not a good selection on the manifold. He claims that when the motor had a tunnel ram on it from the previous owner it ran 8's. I asked then why not go back to that set up? I can't believe that a manifold could change things that much. I know there is the equasion of the vehicle weights.

High compression is OK, but based on the trials I did with Engine Analyzer, it didn't pay off as much as a good set of heads, a good cam and a free breathing manifold with a BIG carb.

I think I can believe the tunnel ram helped alot, the wave reflection effect would be significant on a race engine like this.

Of note one quick way to determine if carb is too small or big is to see what the vacuum is at Wide Open Throttle (WOT). If it is bigger than 1.5Hg then too small.
KLWorra is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009   #9 (permalink)
stang93mustang is offline Made Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 900 Threads: 67
 stang93mustang's Country Flag  View stang93mustang's 12 photos  View stang93mustang's HomePage
Elgin   Illinois
Default

Thanks for all of the comments on this. I know I'm not crazy. I just got back from this guys house and he is dead set on this motor running over 8000rpm with a 9k chip in it.

I hope his pockets are fat because he's go to need to dig deep in them to replace things.

We have planned a trip to the track together so we can shut one or the other up. He says he has a couple more tunning tricks and "it's on!" You know I'll advise when this happens.

Looks like I will get to witness his devistation from my mirrors as I cross the finish line!
__________________
Building it right from the beginning is always better than starting over to build it better because it was temporary.

93' LX hatch, 460 with mods, TH400 trans, 9" w/ 3.89 spool. Best (so far!) of 10.18 @ 131 mph with 1.39 60'

Reese,
stang93mustang is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2009   #10 (permalink)
cindys_sn95 is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,879 Threads: 13
 cindys_sn95's Country Flag  View cindys_sn95's 5 photos
Gulfport   Mississippi
Default

just agree with him, go ahead put that 9000 chip in it..
cindys_sn95 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2009   #11 (permalink)
25thfox is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 268 Threads: 14
 25thfox's Country Flag
Fargo   North Dakota
Default

That is going to be the end of that engine. Let s know what happens
__________________
New Set UP
1990 Mustang LX 5.0, stock bottom end, Holly 165 aluminum Heads, Comp 600 lift Valve Springs, Scorpion 1.6rr with 3/8 stud mount, BBK Headers, BBK O/R H-Pipe, Flowmaster 40 Series Mufflers, Comp Cams XE274 cam, Edlebrock Performer RPM intake, Holley 650dp Carb, MSD Billet Distributor, Moroso 8mm Wires, Crane Fireball Ignition and Coil, B&M Shift Kit, Art Carr 3500 Stall Converter, Hotchkis LCA/UCA, Ford Racing 4.10 Gears, 255 pounds lighter.
25thfox is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are all pulleys created equal? Smurf stang 5.0L Tech 4 05-22-2009 06:32 PM
Street Fighter Blocks systronic 5.0L Tech 0 06-04-2006 11:23 AM
what big blocks can be found for cheap in a yard? tostaroller Classic Talk 2 08-10-2003 03:58 PM
351W-302 what year of blocks can i use??? black88lx 5.0L Tech 7 06-15-2003 06:22 AM
Anybody know where to buy 4.6 and 4.0 short blocks? Projectnighthwk 4.6L Tech 4 09-11-2002 11:14 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112