<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Ford Mustang Forums - Classic Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums</link>
		<description>Lets talk Tech about Classic Mustangs!  Discuss and debate All Technical topics here.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:45:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>SFI approved balancer doesnt sit flush to end of cranksnout.</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205832-sfi-approved-balancer-doesnt-sit-flush-end-cranksnout.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:07:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Ok, after boiling this balancer and using a wood block and minisledge I was able to get this SFI aftermarket balacer on as far as it will go, but it hangs about a 1/4 of an inch off the cranksnout.  however, when I mock up the crank pully and water pump pully it lines up perfect, should I torque it...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Ok, after boiling this balancer and using a wood block and minisledge I was able to get this SFI aftermarket balacer on as far as it will go, but it hangs about a 1/4 of an inch off the cranksnout.  however, when I mock up the crank pully and water pump pully it lines up perfect, should I torque it down as is or what?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>Pig Muffin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205832-sfi-approved-balancer-doesnt-sit-flush-end-cranksnout.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Classic Oil (1966 200ci)</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205818-classic-oil-1966-200ci.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hello all, 
And a BIG thankyou to you all for your advice and assistance to date! 
Have gotten hold of a new Rad, Heater Core and Halogen Headlamps as a direct result of this forum, as well as finding out the correct oil for the C4 Auto! 
 
Another quick question, want to perform a full fluid...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello all,<br />
And a BIG thankyou to you all for your advice and assistance to date!<br />
Have gotten hold of a new Rad, Heater Core and Halogen Headlamps as a direct result of this forum, as well as finding out the correct oil for the C4 Auto!<br />
<br />
Another quick question, want to perform a full fluid change this weekend, including the engine oil. My 66' had the 200 Straight Six, and the previous owner admits to putting in Fully Synthetic Oil, which i don't think the car likes, as at first starting it's a little 'tappety' and after even a sort drive, i swear i can hear the oil 'bubbling' NOT GOOD!<br />
<br />
So, what should be in there? 15/30? I am at a bit of a loss, and can't seem to find a definitive answer online!<br />
<br />
Look forward to all your advice,<br />
<br />
Christopher</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Thumbnails</legend>
			<div style="padding:3px">
			<a href="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/attachments/classic-tech/83948d1258739749-classic-oil-1966-200ci-stuff.jpg" rel="Lightbox" id="attachment83948" target="_blank"><img class="thumbnail" src="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/attachments/classic-tech/83948d1258739749t-classic-oil-1966-200ci-stuff.jpg" border="0" alt="Click image for larger version

Name:	Stuff.jpg
Views:	N/A
Size:	42.6 KB
ID:	83948" /></a>
&nbsp;
			</div>
		</fieldset>
	

	

	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>CortinaChris</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205818-classic-oil-1966-200ci.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dual red line tires</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205809-dual-red-line-tires.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I know of only two independent sources for red line tires for an early Mustang:  Coker and Diamond Back.  Diamond Back (dbtires.com) offers only radials while Coker (coker.com) has both radial and bias ply versions.  The prices for the two brands of radials aren't all that much different; either...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I know of only two independent sources for red line tires for an early Mustang:  Coker and Diamond Back.  Diamond Back (dbtires.com) offers only radials while Coker (coker.com) has both radial and bias ply versions.  The prices for the two brands of radials aren't all that much different; either will set you back around $200 per delivered tire.  Are there any others to choose from?<br />
<br />
DB modifies existing radials by vulcanizing red, white, blue, gold (pick a color) walls onto the tires.  Coker makes their own limited production tires using, what Diamond Back would claim are old worn out molds that major companies discarded years ago.  The DB radials have better ratings and the the DB argument that using a modern tire made by a 'major manufacturer' who makes millions of them provides a better product seems to be reasonable.<br />
<br />
The proof is in the product though.  I plan to drive the car so I am considering only radials.  What experience do any of you have with either or both of these radial red lines?  1) Do they look similar to an original?  and 2) If you were going to drive the car which is the best choice?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>Ivy66GT</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205809-dual-red-line-tires.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1966 stalls when running hot</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205794-1966-stalls-when-running-hot.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:52:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[My 1966 200 auto straight 6 has a recent rebuilt carb, new voltage regulator, points, condenser, and a new thermostat (160*) all because just recently, it stalls when I accelerate from a stop (it sometimes will quit and lose all electrical power for awhile.....ie: once it stalls, I'll turn the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My 1966 200 auto straight 6 has a recent rebuilt carb, new voltage regulator, points, condenser, and a new thermostat (160*) all because just recently, it stalls when I accelerate from a stop (it sometimes will quit and lose all electrical power for awhile.....ie: once it stalls, I'll turn the ignition and there will be absolutely no power, but I'll turn the key off, then back on, and the car will start).<br />
 <br />
This happens only when the car runs hot (for some reason, even with 2 new thermostats, the car runs hot in the upper range).<br />
 <br />
Anyone had this problem or know of a fix?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>scast34</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205794-1966-stalls-when-running-hot.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Procar Rally Seats</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205792-procar-rally-seats.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:33:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Anybody using the Rally seats by Procar. I have a 67 coupe and have been looking at these seats. Any problems with install. They look very comfortable . Any pictures would be great. Thanks    Matt</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Anybody using the Rally seats by Procar. I have a 67 coupe and have been looking at these seats. Any problems with install. They look very comfortable . Any pictures would be great. Thanks    Matt</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>mlstang</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205792-procar-rally-seats.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1964 mustang convertable c-4 to c-6 transmission swap</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205790-1964-mustang-convertable-c-4-c-6-transmission-swap.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:46:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm sure that this has been done before, but not my me so I need help. I'm putting a 5.0 HO in my 1966 Convertable and I want to put a c-6 behind it instead of the small imput spline c-4. Besides a different tail shaft support, what other pitfalls am I facing?:worship]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I'm sure that this has been done before, but not my me so I need help. I'm putting a 5.0 HO in my 1966 Convertable and I want to put a c-6 behind it instead of the small imput spline c-4. Besides a different tail shaft support, what other pitfalls am I facing?:worship</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>Chip A</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205790-1964-mustang-convertable-c-4-c-6-transmission-swap.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Need 3rd Opinion on my Project Car</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205777-need-3rd-opinion-my-project-car.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have a stock 69 Inline-6 with only 85k miles on it. 
 
Long story short, it runs great, looks great, but I want more out of it. 
 
1st Opinion:  
Keep the car classic, restore it and keep it stock. 
 
2nd Opinion: 
Pull the engine and get a 302 in there.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have a stock 69 Inline-6 with only 85k miles on it.<br />
<br />
Long story short, it runs great, looks great, but I want more out of it.<br />
<br />
1st Opinion: <br />
Keep the car classic, restore it and keep it stock.<br />
<br />
2nd Opinion:<br />
Pull the engine and get a 302 in there.<br />
<br />
Now I ask you, forum experts, what should I do?<br />
<br />
Please include a why &amp; how in your response.<br />
<br />
Party on.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Thumbnails</legend>
			<div style="padding:3px">
			<a href="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/attachments/classic-tech/83932d1258700280-need-3rd-opinion-my-project-car-6143764195079596241.jpeg" rel="Lightbox" id="attachment83932" target="_blank"><img class="thumbnail" src="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/attachments/classic-tech/83932d1258700280t-need-3rd-opinion-my-project-car-6143764195079596241.jpeg" border="0" alt="Click image for larger version

Name:	6143764195079596241.jpeg
Views:	N/A
Size:	34.2 KB
ID:	83932" /></a>
&nbsp;
			</div>
		</fieldset>
	

	

	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>69DoYouLikeIt</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205777-need-3rd-opinion-my-project-car.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>One wire alternator for 72 MachI</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205768-one-wire-alternator-72-machi.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I need help of wiring this Tuff Stuff  alternator One Wire 100 Amp to my 72. I have  amp meter gauge and no circuit breaker inside the engine bay. Only a terminal block that connects from old alternator to a  
black wire with red stripe .I suppose  this supply the power to all accessories and to...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I need help of wiring this Tuff Stuff  alternator One Wire 100 Amp to my 72. I have  amp meter gauge and no circuit breaker inside the engine bay. Only a terminal block that connects from old alternator to a <br />
black wire with red stripe .I suppose  this supply the power to all accessories and to the amp meter. Thanks</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>must72ang</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205768-one-wire-alternator-72-machi.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Birth Date & DSO]]></title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205767-birth-date-dso.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:21:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>In the interest of trying to find the pedigree of my old horse I have put together some numbers found loose in the vehicle. 
  
On a Black cardboard tag: 
  
MSWBP 10 3 63 
C A5-2054 
C4ZB6566700A 
  
On a Tan coloured luggage type label:</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In the interest of trying to find the pedigree of my old horse I have put together some numbers found loose in the vehicle.<br />
 <br />
On a Black cardboard tag:<br />
 <br />
MSWBP 10 3 63<br />
C A5-2054<br />
C4ZB6566700A<br />
 <br />
On a Tan coloured luggage type label:<br />
 <br />
From - Allen In----ries Inc<br />
Crompton, California<br />
Ford Mustang<br />
C4ZB-6566800-A<br />
SJ-15 10 Pieces<br />
Date______________________<br />
 <br />
On reverse side:<br />
MAR 19 1965<br />
 <br />
 <br />
Could this be the missing clue?<br />
The warrenty number is 5R07A205794</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>rocky289</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205767-birth-date-dso.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Grant Steering Wheel Adapter and Removable Adapter install problems</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205754-grant-steering-wheel-adapter-removable-adapter-install-problems.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm having a f***'n hard time getting this damn wheel on my 66.  It's easy without the removable adapter but with the adapter, it's super hard. Anyone have any tips? Also if you have this security adapter, did you have problems trying to get the steering wheel on it? The cover goes on no problem...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I'm having a f***'n hard time getting this damn wheel on my 66.  It's easy without the removable adapter but with the adapter, it's super hard. Anyone have any tips? Also if you have this security adapter, did you have problems trying to get the steering wheel on it? The cover goes on no problem but when putting the wheel adapter onto it, it won't budge, but it'll fit the splines evenly.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>SDMustangRider</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205754-grant-steering-wheel-adapter-removable-adapter-install-problems.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Early convertible tops</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205713-early-convertible-tops.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't want to have a show winner or even enter any judgings but I would like to put my '66 convertible, which I bought in 1982, back to almost factory condition.   I hope to finish it in time to drive it to my 50th high school reunion in 2016.  :bigthumbsup Since I bought a 16 year old car there...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I don't want to have a show winner or even enter any judgings but I would like to put my '66 convertible, which I bought in 1982, back to almost factory condition.   I hope to finish it in time to drive it to my 50th high school reunion in 2016.  :bigthumbsup Since I bought a 16 year old car there is no guarantee that its top was original; I know that at least the plastic window had been replaced.  However, the convertible top 'pads' I recently removed look to me like they might have been originals.  The long strips from front to rear on each side were a straight, 7&quot; wide, heavy (maybe 3/32&quot; thick), black canvas webbing while the 2 rear quarter panel pieces were trapezoidal shaped (7&quot; where they join the long ones and almost 12&quot; at the belt line) and  of a slightly different, mildly stretchy fabric.  None of these had signs of any foam or padding.   NPD sells a $111  (ouch!) set of 'original style concours correct black' pads that look like what I removed but since their picture is from 50 feet away its not easy to really tell.  There seems to be a problem with the name 'pads' if an original set had no padding.  :scratchchin<br />
<br />
Today I talked with a local guy who says he has been installing tops on these cars for over 30 years (still a decade after 1966) and that early Mustangs like 64 1/2 to 66 did not use plain, heavy canvas but used a folded affair with 1/4&quot; or so of foam inside to form a real pad on each side.  He says they were also tapered from 7&quot; at the front to over 9&quot; wide at the rear.  It seems to me that either this guy or NPD (see their catalog, p45) is pulling my leg.  The Ford shop manual is not all that clear but its words and pictures seem to support what I found and also what NPD sells.<br />
<br />
Will the expert(s) on early convertible tops please stand up and tell us what was REALLY used on the early cars.  A secondary question would be how close to original will I get for my $111 to NPD?  'Generic' top pads from the same source are only $35 but I know even less about what they might be.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>Ivy66GT</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205713-early-convertible-tops.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rally-pac tach reads high</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205705-rally-pac-tach-reads-high.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:49:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know if there is a way to adjust a Rally-Pac tachometer?  Mine seems to read about 150rpm high at idle, when compared to readings off an external tach/dwell meter.  There's a screw in the bottom of the face, but I don't want to fool with it if I don't know what it's for.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Does anyone know if there is a way to adjust a Rally-Pac tachometer?  Mine seems to read about 150rpm high at idle, when compared to readings off an external tach/dwell meter.  There's a screw in the bottom of the face, but I don't want to fool with it if I don't know what it's for.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>Joes72/65</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205705-rally-pac-tach-reads-high.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Splash Shield replacement</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205698-splash-shield-replacement.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I just found I have a rust problem. It is the left front rear splash shield by the door jam. It is rusted thru at the top part. My question, is this a simple bolt-on part? I know the front fender has to come off. But other than that, any welding involved? I'm also wanting to change the seals.  
...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I just found I have a rust problem. It is the left front rear splash shield by the door jam. It is rusted thru at the top part. My question, is this a simple bolt-on part? I know the front fender has to come off. But other than that, any welding involved? I'm also wanting to change the seals. <br />
<br />
So much for this car being rust free. But, if that's all I have, &quot;that's a good thing Martha&quot;.............</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>1966er</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205698-splash-shield-replacement.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boss 302 and a Mexican 302?</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205687-boss-302-mexican-302-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:48:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Guys, 
  
What is the difference between a Boss 302 block and a Mexican 302 block?  Thanks in advance.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><font size="4">Guys,</font><br />
 <br />
<font size="4">What is the difference between a Boss 302 block and a Mexican 302 block?  Thanks in advance.</font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>904dc</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205687-boss-302-mexican-302-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1964 1/2 289 stock heads</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205685-1964-1-2-289-stock-heads.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:24:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Would anyone know what cc size  of chambers on stock heads on 1964 1/2 289 
thanks, gary</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Would anyone know what cc size  of chambers on stock heads on 1964 1/2 289<br />
thanks, gary</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>pav</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205685-1964-1-2-289-stock-heads.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Help identify mystery heater box parts?</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205676-help-identify-mystery-heater-box-parts.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:19:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[As y'all know, I pulled my heater box many a moon ago. I also had to unbolt the underdash A/C evap case and slide it to the side to get out the box. 
  
I placed all the bits and pieces, including the direct heater box parts, into a box and stored it in the trunk. 
  
I now have the heater box...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>As y'all know, I pulled my heater box many a moon ago. I also had to unbolt the underdash A/C evap case and slide it to the side to get out the box.<br />
 <br />
I placed all the bits and pieces, including the direct heater box parts, into a box and stored it in the trunk.<br />
 <br />
I now have the heater box completely assembled but I still have these two pieces that are unaccounted for. I have not, as yet, attempted to reinstall the box and re-mount the A/C evap unit.<br />
 <br />
What could these pieces be for? Where might they go? They are 1&quot; square and 5/16&quot; thick. FWIIW, I think the A/C was factory installed.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y144/Boomyal/Mysteryspacers.jpg" target="_blank">http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y14...eryspacers.jpg</a><br />
 <br />
Also, what kind of 'nuts' are used on the three heaterbox/defroster flap levers? Are they all the same? Are they the little 'hat' type push nut or are they flat square or flat round push nuts?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>Boomyal</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205676-help-identify-mystery-heater-box-parts.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[65 Mustang 4 lug 7.25 swap to 8" 5 lug convertion]]></title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205668-65-mustang-4-lug-7-25-swap-8-5-lug-convertion.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:20:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello all..., I'm in the process of swapping out my 7.25 rearend to a 8 inch 5 lugger. my question for you guys is will I have to replace the universes, or can I use the exsisting one, also my tarnny is auto. Oh and my 8" is the one with the tapper ends. Help please]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello all..., I'm in the process of swapping out my 7.25 rearend to a 8 inch 5 lugger. my question for you guys is will I have to replace the universes, or can I use the exsisting one, also my tarnny is auto. Oh and my 8&quot; is the one with the tapper ends. Help please</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>jdrider</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205668-65-mustang-4-lug-7-25-swap-8-5-lug-convertion.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1965 Transmission swap from C4 to AOD</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205655-1965-transmission-swap-c4-aod.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:45:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I am anticipating changing my transmission from a C4 to an AOD.  I have found a transmission shop that will do it, but they indicate that is is difficult and time consuming.  I found instructions from I believe Mustang Plus that are very long and detailed and it does indeed look difficult.  Am I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I am anticipating changing my transmission from a C4 to an AOD.  I have found a transmission shop that will do it, but they indicate that is is difficult and time consuming.  I found instructions from I believe Mustang Plus that are very long and detailed and it does indeed look difficult.  Am I crazy to do this?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>meiring37ford</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205655-1965-transmission-swap-c4-aod.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1966 disc brake conversion</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205640-1966-disc-brake-conversion.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:38:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I got a 66 with a 302.  It was orginally a i6.  The rear was converted to five lug but the front is still a four.  I want to order some front disc brakes but I want to change the front into five lug.  I was also wondering which conversion kit would be best and how I would get this done.  Any help?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I got a 66 with a 302.  It was orginally a i6.  The rear was converted to five lug but the front is still a four.  I want to order some front disc brakes but I want to change the front into five lug.  I was also wondering which conversion kit would be best and how I would get this done.  Any help?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>gungho06</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205640-1966-disc-brake-conversion.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1970 302 camshaft suggestions</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205635-1970-302-camshaft-suggestions.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Im looking for a cam thats a lil more agressive than the cam i currently have in my 70 coupe. Its a comp cams 260H with 212 duration and .447in lift on both intake and exhaust.I also wanted to know how much lift ford cast iorn heads can handle. Any ideas???</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Im looking for a cam thats a lil more agressive than the cam i currently have in my 70 coupe. Its a comp cams 260H with 212 duration and .447in lift on both intake and exhaust.I also wanted to know how much lift ford cast iorn heads can handle. Any ideas???</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>7tstang70</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205635-1970-302-camshaft-suggestions.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[1967 Mustang 289 won't start]]></title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205632-1967-mustang-289-wont-start.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:22:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I am rebuilding a 67. The carburetor was rebuilt a few months ago. Over the last few month, I've replaced the water pump, fuel pump, fuel filter, hoses, spark plugs etc. But every time I try to start the car I have to use starter fluid to get it to start. Once it starts, it runs fine. When I  try...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I am rebuilding a 67. The carburetor was rebuilt a few months ago. Over the last few month, I've replaced the water pump, fuel pump, fuel filter, hoses, spark plugs etc. But every time I try to start the car I have to use starter fluid to get it to start. Once it starts, it runs fine. When I  try to start it after running it for a while it starts right up. But when I come back to it a week, or even a day later, same problem. It also seems to have a stuck float. I was told to tap the carb with a hammer to free it up - and that worked. But every day it's the same problem. I've disconnected the fuel line and gas is flowing through the fuel filter but it was rusty. I installed another fuel filter (so there are now two) - but still have the same problem. Meanwhile, I've killed my battery a few times trying to get it to turn over. Any suggestions?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>davep5150</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205632-1967-mustang-289-wont-start.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1967 coupe Heater Issues</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205620-1967-coupe-heater-issues.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:38:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[ok first and foremost, my heater draws way too much power, it blows the fuse and my Stereo, and Gear Selection light goes out as well. 
 
I'm horrible with reading these damn diagrams, so please give me an idea of where to look for the wires or whatever i need to check it, pictures would be ideal....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>ok first and foremost, my heater draws way too much power, it blows the fuse and my Stereo, and Gear Selection light goes out as well.<br />
<br />
I'm horrible with reading these damn diagrams, so please give me an idea of where to look for the wires or whatever i need to check it, pictures would be ideal.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Second, on the heater only one setting works, Full Blast and it only blows out of the bottom of the dash at the feet. What do i do to change that???</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>Faith No More</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205620-1967-coupe-heater-issues.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[add power steering ?'s]]></title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205613-add-power-steering-s.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have a 1968 big block fastback with manual steering, and a 1968 small block parts car with power steering. can i transfer the power steering system from the 289 car to the 428 car? i assume i will need a different engine bracket for the pump, and may need to route the hoses to avoid the headers. ...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have a 1968 big block fastback with manual steering, and a 1968 small block parts car with power steering. can i transfer the power steering system from the 289 car to the 428 car? i assume i will need a different engine bracket for the pump, and may need to route the hoses to avoid the headers.  any other problems i should anticipate? <br />
thanks for the help.<br />
eric</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>petdoc</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205613-add-power-steering-s.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>289 HiPo infromation</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205610-289-hipo-infromation.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:12:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I recently purchase what I was told is a 289 HiPo motor. Could anyone provide me with some data on the casting numbers? They are 75ZY-6015-AA 
  
The top of the block in the casting is Hecho in Mexico. Thanks in advance.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><font size="4">I recently purchase what I was told is a 289 HiPo motor. Could anyone provide me with some data on the casting numbers? They are </font><font size="4">75ZY-6015-AA</font><br />
 <br />
<font size="4">The top of the block in the casting is Hecho in Mexico. Thanks in advance.</font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>904dc</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205610-289-hipo-infromation.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>need help on T5 conversion</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205604-need-help-t5-conversion.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:23:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I just picked up a 92 re-built T5 tranny to go into my 66 fastback 4-speed car.  It came with a clutch cable, a Centerforce Dual Friction clutch, pressure plate, adjustable quadrant, fire wall adjuster, Steeda tri-ax shifter, Bell housing, Flywheel and a few other little things.  I'm not sure if I...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><font face="Arial"><font size="2">I just picked up a 92 re-built T5 <acronym title="transmission">tranny</acronym> to go into my 66 fastback 4-speed car.  It came with a clutch cable, a Centerforce Dual Friction clutch, pressure plate, adjustable quadrant, fire wall adjuster, Steeda tri-ax shifter, Bell housing, Flywheel and a few other little things.  I'm not sure if I will  need everything.  I do know I will need the spacer, A T5 cross member and I'm sure some more parts.  Can anyone help me out on what else I may need?</font></font><br />
 <br />
<font face="Arial"><font size="2">Thanks' Greg</font></font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>GGregory</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205604-need-help-t5-conversion.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>are 15x8 wheels too wide for the front?</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205551-15x8-wheels-too-wide-front.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:52:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>hello everyone. i have an oppertunity to pick up some 15x8 wheels at a good price for my 70 mustang coupe (http://mustangforums.com/forum/#) (stock suspension) but i am not sure if they will be too wide for the front. i see several of you run 8 inch wide rims up front but i cant seem to find...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>hello everyone. i have an oppertunity to pick up some 15x8 wheels at a good price for my 70 mustang <a href="http://mustangforums.com/forum/#" target="_blank">coupe</a> (stock suspension) but i am not sure if they will be too wide for the front. i see several of you run 8 inch wide rims up front but i cant seem to find whether or not there are rubbing issues when turning. if anyone has 15x8 up front please let me know about the fit and what backspacing you have also what tire size you run. i appreciate the help.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>roadrash74</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205551-15x8-wheels-too-wide-front.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Arvinode Exhaust System</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205528-arvinode-exhaust-system.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:31:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi! 
  
Has anyone tried the Arvinode Exhaust System that was discussed, recently, in Mustang Monthly?  If so, what did you think of it? 
  
Thanks,:bigthumbsup 
/s/ Chris Kennedy</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi!<br />
 <br />
Has anyone tried the Arvinode Exhaust System that was discussed, recently, in Mustang Monthly?  If so, what did you think of it?<br />
 <br />
Thanks,:bigthumbsup<br />
/s/ Chris Kennedy</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>chris kennedy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205528-arvinode-exhaust-system.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1967 mercury cougar brake replacement with modern mustang brakes</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205520-1967-mercury-cougar-brake-replacement-modern-mustang-brakes.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:53:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I have a 1967 mercury cougar. I'm looking to use modern mustang brakes I can get at a junk yard to redo both front and rear brakes. Anyone familiar with what might work? Can I just replace the spindle out or is a conversion kit the only way to go. I'm only looking for disc brakes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have a 1967 mercury cougar. I'm looking to use modern mustang brakes I can get at a junk yard to redo both front and rear brakes. Anyone familiar with what might work? Can I just replace the spindle out or is a conversion kit the only way to go. I'm only looking for disc brakes.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>Stittdba</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205520-1967-mercury-cougar-brake-replacement-modern-mustang-brakes.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Oil Pan Drain Bolt Size for 1965 Mustang 289?</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205511-oil-pan-drain-bolt-size-1965-mustang-289-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi! 
  
Does anyone off-hand know the size of the oil pan drain bolt for a '65 289?  I want to use one of those copper/rubber gaskets for a washer, and want to get the right one. 
  
Thanks! 
/s/ Chris Kennedy:)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi!<br />
 <br />
Does anyone off-hand know the size of the oil pan drain bolt for a '65 289?  I want to use one of those copper/rubber gaskets for a washer, and want to get the right one.<br />
 <br />
Thanks!<br />
/s/ Chris Kennedy:)</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>chris kennedy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205511-oil-pan-drain-bolt-size-1965-mustang-289-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Dearborn Radiator identification</title>
			<link>http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205507-original-dearborn-radiator-identification.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:00:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I have a 64 1/2 mustang, build date of 19 June 64.  I recently purchased a restored radiator from a mustang parts supplier that is supposed to be a May 64 Dearborn radiator, but I'm not sure it's an original. 
  
Radiator details: *Radiator 65 V8 Dearborn, auto trans, DEP C4ZE 8005 - M2, date 4ED...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><font face="Arial">I have a 64 1/2 mustang, build date of 19 June 64.  I recently purchased a restored radiator from a mustang parts supplier that is supposed to be a May 64 Dearborn radiator, but I'm not sure it's an original.</font><br />
 <br />
<font face="Arial">Radiator details: <b>Radiator 65 V8 Dearborn, auto <acronym title="transmission">trans</acronym>, DEP C4ZE 8005 - M2, date 4ED (1964 May 4th week).</b></font><br />
 <br />
<font face="Arial">The radiator has the information above stamped along the side rail, but on the passenger side of the radiator versus the driver's side.  I've only heard of the radiator identification information being stamped on the driver's side.  The radiator also has rounded &quot;tabs&quot; at the top of the tank exactly like what you find for San Jose radiators when all Dearborn tanks I've seen are square on top.  There is a rectangular metal tag (about 3/4-inchs wide, 1 1/2 inches long)soldered onto the top of the tank at the top edge of the tank on the passenger side, with C4ZE, but I know that these are reporduced and purchased through vendors like NPD, so I've discounted this tag although it's correct for Dearborn cars.</font><br />
 <br />
<font face="Arial">Radiators around my build date time frame were only the Dearborn radiator style as San Jose did not start up mustang production until late 64 (I think toward the end of July 64) and the Metuchen NJ plant never produced any 64 1/2 mustangs.</font><br />
 <br />
<font face="Arial">Any help with getting a proper ID of this radiator would be appreciated.  I'll try and post pics of the radiator later tonight.</font><br />
 <br />
<font face="Arial">Thanks!</font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/">Classic Tech</category>
			<dc:creator>jsfchris</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forums/classic-tech/205507-original-dearborn-radiator-identification.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
