AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Mustang Forums > Mustang II > Mustang II Tech
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
Introductions| Mustang Lounge | Mustang II Talk | Mustang II Tech | Mustang Tech | Tech | Racing | Regional

Reply
 
Old 04-02-2008   #1 (permalink)
1978CobraII is offline Apprentice

Mustang II Member


Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 167 Threads: 38
 1978CobraII's Country Flag  View 1978CobraII's 17 photos
Spencerport   New York
Send a message via AIM to 1978CobraII
Default 500 cfm carb, will it harm my mileage?

I've been to the preformance sites and I noticed a intake that was single plane. It recommended using a larger 2 barrel holley carburator. Holley offers the 350 and 500 cfm carbs. Will the 500 harm my wanted revving capabilities and gas mileage? Will the 350 work fine for the single plane?
__________________
Oh though I walk through the valley of the rice, I fear no turbo, for torque art with me.

1978 Mustang Cobra II:2.3 Auto Black with Red and Orange Graphics
1976 Mustang Cobra II:302 4 Speed Knocks like a Champ. Black with Gold Stripes
1978CobraII is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008   #2 (permalink)
74stang2togo is offline Forums Moderator

Mustang II Member
2.3L Member
5.0L Member


Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,381 Threads: 170
 74stang2togo's Country Flag  View 74stang2togo's 8 photos  View 74stang2togo's HomePage
Central   Texas
Send a message via AIM to 74stang2togo Send a message via Yahoo to 74stang2togo
Default

What engine do you have???

If you've got a 2.3 or a 2.8, the answer is yes, the 500cfm carb will more than likely hurt your mileage as that caburetor is larger than what the stock camshaft and head(s) can handle. The 350cfm carb wouldn't be a bad choice for a 2.8 as long as the exhaust was also upgraded and it was properly tuned, the 2.3 would require some fabrication to fit the 350cfm Holley 2-bbl.

If your car has a 302, then the answer is maybe. If your car is in good running order, and you know what you're doing with that Holley 500cfm 2-bbl. carb, you can adjust and tune it so that you'll pick up a little performance without hurting your mileage. The 350cfm carb isn't really all that great of a choice for a 302 because the stock carburetor is pretty close to the same flow numbers and was already factory calibrated for your engine.
__________________
1976 Ford Mustang II Ghia: 302 with a 600cfm Edelbrock carb, Edelbrock Performer 289 intake, Dynomax Blackjack headers, 2.5" exhaust with Flowmaster Super 44s. RJS 11-gallon fuel cell, C4 tranny, chrome 16" pony wheels, fuzzy dice, brown vinyl half-top, and painted in the tackiest color ever (harvest gold, that's why I call it "The Goldenrod").

Also have a 2003 Dodge Ram (lightly modded daily driver/tow rig/office/dining room/home away from home/workshop... I call it "The Big Blue Dawg".)
74stang2togo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009   #3 (permalink)
70Mach03 is offline Apprentice

Classic Member
4.6L Member


Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 66 Threads: 1
 70Mach03's Country Flag  View 70Mach03's 12 photos
Charleston   South Carolina
Default

I had a Holley 500 CFM on a 1970 302-2V auto fastback Mustang many years ago. The car was stock with the only mod being dual exhaust. I received a very nice sit-of-the-pants boost. I never dyno'ed it as we didn't have access to them in the late 70's, but it felt like probably a 15 to 20 hp boost. I was really surprised but my mpg actually increased slightly. Using a stopwatch, my 0-60 mph time dropped about a second and a half, and I gained about 10 mpg on the top speed. It worked great for me. I played around with the jets a bit and ended up with either 71's or 73's.

Looking at old car magazines from the early 70's showed healthy increases over the standard 2bbl carbs and some were even nearly as good as 4bbl's. For me back then it was a great mod. I always thought if I ever picked up a 351-2V powered vehicle it would be a great mod. Of course back then they only cost around $59 to $79 through the JC Whitney catalog.
__________________
Bill
1970 Mach 1 w/351C-4V, Shakerhood and 5-speed
2003 Mach 1 w/281-4 Valve, Shakerhood, and 5-speed
70Mach03 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Autolite 2100 Carb trouble ADClark1966 Classic Tech 11 02-01-2009 12:08 AM
EV carb hat with 5-6 psi efrascon Power Adders 1 08-31-2008 11:46 PM
Go with Carb or stick with EFI hairygrapes 5.0L Tech 5 01-14-2007 07:09 PM
How to increase Mileage? tyler.anderson 2005-2009 Mustang Talk 27 09-23-2006 04:34 PM
1966 Carb linkage cupony2 Classic Tech 0 08-13-2006 10:20 PM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112