Mustang II front wheel drive setup? - Ford Mustang Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-13-2010 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
dbren's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: Burnet
Posts: 4
 
Mustang II front wheel drive setup?

I want to use a Mustang II front suspension on a ground-up project. It will be lightweight, front wheel drive.
I expect to use a pushrod to an inboard coilover. Has anyone here ever seen a front drive steering knuckle used with the Mustang II suspension?
Thanks,
Don
dbren is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-13-2010
74stang2togo
Guest
 
74stang2togo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbren View Post
I want to use a Mustang II front suspension on a ground-up project. It will be lightweight, front wheel drive.
I expect to use a pushrod to an inboard coilover. Has anyone here ever seen a front drive steering knuckle used with the Mustang II suspension?
Thanks,
Don
The Mustang II front suspension won't work with front wheel drive. There just isn't any way to drive the front wheels on a suspension setup that uses spindles and is so narrow. I'm not even sure there's an engine/transaxle assembly that will fit between the control arms.

You'd be better off looking into good-handling FWD platforms like the Chrysler LHS series (including the Concorde, Intrepid, and LHS); or, if you're not into longitudally mounted engines, the Mazda 626/MX6/Ford Probe suspension is really great as well.

The big problem you're going to run into with FWD setups is that they almost universally use strut towers, meaning you'll need a large portion of the front structure of the car. The Mustang II front suspension is wholly independent, but between it having spindles, and the control arms, shocks, and springs being directly in the way of where your C/V axles would have to go, it's not an option for front-wheel-drive.
post #3 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-13-2010 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
dbren's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: Burnet
Posts: 4
 
Thanks for the quick reply.
I know that i will need to do lots of machining and am prepared to do what's necessary. My drive unit will be lightweight, custom, and small, so I can deal with the narrow front end. With a pushrod to inboard coilovers, it seems that my biggest obstacle would be building a bracket from the top of the knuckle to the top ball joint.

For my project design, I can't use struts due to the height, so I'm faced with trying to adapt the double wishbone to front wheel drive.

If anyone knows of another double wishbone setup that is front wheel drive, I'm open to all suggestions.
Thanks
dbren is offline  
post #4 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-13-2010
PONY Member
Mustang II Member
 
1978CobraII's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Spencerport
Posts: 730
 
Send a message via AIM to 1978CobraII
Honda's have double wish bone's in front and rear I believe.

Oh though I walk through the valley of the rice, I fear no turbo, for torque art with me.

1978 Mustang Cobra II:2.3 Auto Black with Red and Orange Graphics
1976 Mustang Cobra II:302 4 Speed, Knocks like a Champ. Black with Gold Stripes. '70 302 in the works.
1978CobraII is offline  
post #5 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-13-2010 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
dbren's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: Burnet
Posts: 4
 
Yes, I have looked at various other double wishbones, however, most of them have the upper wishbone above wheel height. I have to keep the lower profile like formula one.
Thanks
dbren is offline  
post #6 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-13-2010
74stang2togo
Guest
 
74stang2togo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbren View Post
Yes, I have looked at various other double wishbones, however, most of them have the upper wishbone above wheel height.
The reason for that being that they're fitting in a C/V axle through them as well as hubs. What exactly are you trying to build anyway?
post #7 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-14-2010
Apprentice
 
michaeljowen's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 111
 
seems like it COULD work with lots of machining your own parts. in the end i would imagine it not even looking anything close to a mustang II suspension. to get around the coil springs with a CV axle you'd have to go the wishbone honda route (civics of the late 90's), but then you'd have a coil extending above the wheel height, like the photo i've attached of a 98 civic front suspension.

just my 2 cents. good luck.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	98 civic front suspension.jpg
Views:	10362
Size:	49.6 KB
ID:	98683  
michaeljowen is offline  
post #8 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-14-2010
Made Member
Mustang II Member
 
Blue_coyote's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Green City
Posts: 337
 
I have done a bit of thinking along the lines of FWD in a II, but only at the "I wonder if" stage. Have you looked at the AWD front setup from the Aerostar?

I've always thought an AWD II with the front subframe assembly from the Aerostar replacing the Mustang stuff might be workable, since the Aerostar front end unbolts as a unit, and is already capable of holding a 2.8 without modification (the 86 model was available with the same V6 as the II)

Imagine: an AWD II with 200 hp from a V6....I think the hardest part would be getting the AWD transfer case tucked up under the floorpan far enough to clear pea gravel...

78 Rat Snake
74 Avocado Ghia
lotsa parts and nowhere to work with them...
Blue_coyote is offline  
post #9 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-15-2010
Apprentice
Classic Member
 
T. Hadley's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Lake Tapps
Posts: 130
 
I'm really wondering why anyone would want to put that much effort into anything front wheel drive? unless its a special racing class that requires it, because rear wheel drive is Superior in every way over FWD.

Please tell us more about what you are building.

T.

If you call wheels rims, then your not a real car guy and you should go drive a honda.
T. Hadley is offline  
Apprentice
 
michaeljowen's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 111
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Hadley View Post
because rear wheel drive is Superior in every way over FWD.
depends on what type of racing you are doing.
michaeljowen is offline  
Rookie
Mustang II Member
 
74importetr's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Pottstown
Posts: 30
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1978CobraII View Post
Honda's have double wish bone's in front and rear I believe.
right you are my 95 accord has that setup, you could grab a full front subframe from a junkyard for around 140ish, and it leaves plenty of room for a bigger engine as well. ( i had thoughts of droppin a 302 in it at one point, the honda that is)

78 Mach 1 460 coming soon!
rip 78coupe 351 w
74 mach 1 302 (Monroe Handler project)
88 10th Anniversary Rx7 turbo II (sunday car,undergoing resto)
94 Honda Accord Ex Auto ( DD)
95 Honda Accord Ex 5 spd (DD)
96 Honda Accord Ex 5 spd (used to be dd now a parts car) yeah i own 3 hondas, so.... reliable and good gas mileage.
74importetr is offline  
Apprentice
Classic Member
 
T. Hadley's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Lake Tapps
Posts: 130
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeljowen View Post
depends on what type of racing you are doing.
What do you mean?

If you call wheels rims, then your not a real car guy and you should go drive a honda.
T. Hadley is offline  
Apprentice
 
michaeljowen's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 111
 
FWD is better for traction and control in rally racing than RWD (unless it's rear engine-RWD like a porsche or a beetle). although front engine-RWD is more fun and challenging in all cases.
michaeljowen is offline  
post #14 of 19 (permalink) Old 05-19-2010 Thread Starter
Rookie
 
dbren's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: Burnet
Posts: 4
 
Lots of good ideas bouncing here....thanks! I am building a lightweight reverse trike, full electric AC drive, lithium batteries. The first one will be planned for specialty use, then maybe street machines after that.

I would like to be as close to Formula One front end as possible, with the Mustang II aftermarkets being the closest thing to production availability that I've seen. I assume that I'll have to redesign the shock towers and use a linkage pushrod to center-mounted coilovers so that the drive axle can go through, but I have to stay low. The AC motor will bolt to a small differential and probably be direct drive, single speed.

If y'all want a good laugh, go to Fun E Cars to see the first couple prototypes with the electric drive. They were both street legal and driven around town here for the past year. The drive is decent and I am in the middle of installing that motor/drive in a 2006 Suzuki Katana 750 and it will be for sale.

The reverse trike will be a little larger motor, AC with solid state controller, regen braking, and it needs to be pretty quick up to about 100 mph. If you have seen the T-Rex, it will be a similar frame design.
dbren is offline  
74stang2togo
Guest
 
74stang2togo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Why not use the front end out of a Metro? It's light, it's compact, it handles relatively well, and it's low to the ground even WITH strut towers?
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Mustang Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a VALID email address for yourself, otherwise you will not receive the necessary confirmation email needed to confirm, validate and activate your new AFM member account.

Failure to provide a VALID email address, will result in the cancellation of your new AFM member account registration.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Random Question

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183