AFM Web

Go Back   Ford Mustang Forums > Community Forums > Shoot The Breeze > Mustang Lounge
Welcome to AllFordMustangs.com. We look forward to you registering on our forum and making your first post.
 
Introductions | Lounge | Gallery | Albums | Kill Stories | Power Polls | Tech | Regional 
 

Reply
 
Old 11-17-2008   #16 (permalink)
Mercedez L. is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759 Threads: 59
 Mercedez L.'s Country Flag
San Francisco   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2oo5GT View Post
well for a luxury type car with some performance, i would say caddy. For the sports car with performance it's the GT500. For suspension and stuff, i would say they both would do great but since the GT500 is more sporty, i'm pretty sure that's one thing Ford paid attention to more than GM. I would think they would both fair on reliability.
My choice hands down would be the GT500.
Sometime down the line they will be making a Caddy 2 dr. coupe a CTS with the back cut down. They may even put the V engine into it like everything else follows.
Mercedez L. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008   #17 (permalink)
RLG34750 is offline Forums Moderator

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 15,445 Threads: 472
 RLG34750's Country Flag  View RLG34750's 43 photos  View RLG34750's 2 classified ads  View RLG34750's HomePage
Palm Bay   Florida
Send a message via Yahoo to RLG34750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedez L. View Post
Sometime down the line they will be making a Caddy 2 dr. coupe a CTS with the back cut down. They may even put the V engine into it like everything else follows.

i'm just curious what is the point to this cadillac conversation...

__________________
Reggie

Real Racers Don't Street Race

PERIOD.......

'88 LX Hatch With A Little Of This & A Little Of That......
10.39 @128 MPH Soon to be faster....
RLG34750 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #18 (permalink)
Mercedez L. is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759 Threads: 59
 Mercedez L.'s Country Flag
San Francisco   California
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by spdjnky_42 View Post
The caddy is definetly a better car for quality and ride. The mustang probably wins in all the other aspects along w/ retail value.
Does the GT-500 have the same size wheels on front and back?
The CTS-V has different size tires for the front and the back just like the Corvette. What is the reason for this as then you can't rotate the tires.
Mercedez L. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #19 (permalink)
90markvii is offline Made Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 679 Threads: 46
 90markvii's Country Flag
Sterling Heights   Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedez L. View Post
Does the GT-500 have the same size wheels on front and back?
The CTS-V has different size tires for the front and the back just like the Corvette. What is the reason for this as then you can't rotate the tires.
No the gt500 also has larger tires out back.

They do this on performance rear wheel drive cars so they can gain a little more traction

You can rotate the wheels side to side lol...
__________________
1990 Lincoln Mark VII LSC
FMS Ceramic Shorties, pacesetter off road h, force mufflers, 3 row radiator, smog eliminator pulley, underdrive pullies, Yukon 3.55 gears, posi diff...
Waiting in garage: rebuilt block, Crane 1.7 rr, bare GT40 cast heads, Summit billit distributor, 9mm plug wires, MSD blaster coil, GT40 upper and lower intake, E303 cam
70% of drivers say "oh Sh** when they hit ice, the other 30% are from Michigan and say "Hold my beer and watch this sh**!"
90markvii is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #20 (permalink)
shakerhood is offline Senior Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,293 Threads: 6
 shakerhood's Country Flag  View shakerhood's 7 photos
Pittsburgh   Pennsylvania
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedez L. View Post
WHAT ABOUT THE WEIGHT DISTRIBITUION?
AND IT IS ROUGH RIDING TOO.

Weight Distribution must be fine as they got the new Shelby to pull 1G on the Skidpad...
shakerhood is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #21 (permalink)
Mercedez L. is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759 Threads: 59
 Mercedez L.'s Country Flag
San Francisco   California
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by 90markvii View Post
No the gt500 also has larger tires out back.

They do this on performance rear wheel drive cars so they can gain a little more traction

You can rotate the wheels side to side lol...
THIS ISN'T PRESENT ON THE STANDARD NEW mUSTANG gt IS IT?
ACTUALLY I INTERPRET THIS PART OF TIRE MAINTENANCE ..MAINTENACE FREE SINCE YOU CAN'T REALLY ROTATE. THE TIRES STAY WHERE THEY ARE AT LESS MAINTEANCE.
Mercedez L. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #22 (permalink)
Mercedez L. is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759 Threads: 59
 Mercedez L.'s Country Flag
San Francisco   California
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by shakerhood View Post
Weight Distribution must be fine as they got the new Shelby to pull 1G on the Skidpad...
CARS LIKE THE CORVETTE AND CTS ARE CLOSER TO 49/51.
Mercedez L. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #23 (permalink)
shakerhood is offline Senior Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,293 Threads: 6
 shakerhood's Country Flag  View shakerhood's 7 photos
Pittsburgh   Pennsylvania
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedez L. View Post
CARS LIKE THE CORVETTE AND CTS ARE CLOSER TO 49/51.
I understand the weight distribution on a Vette because of the Torque Tube, Tranny, and Chassis Design, but I am saying that the new Shelby still pulls 1G on the Skidpad even though it does not have perfect 50/50 WD!
shakerhood is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #24 (permalink)
Mercedez L. is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759 Threads: 59
 Mercedez L.'s Country Flag
San Francisco   California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shakerhood View Post
I understand the weight distribution on a Vette because of the Torque Tube, Tranny, and Chassis Design, but I am saying that the new Shelby still pulls 1G on the Skidpad even though it does not have perfect 50/50 WD!
But in the end both CAD and GT-500 KR are in the 4,000+ range both RWD and it looks like the CTS-V is the faster car in a straight line. Top speed not sure. Both cars are supercharged too.
So the CTS-V will blow the GT-500 KR away? It does kill the standard base Corvette.
Mercedez L. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #25 (permalink)
RLG34750 is offline Forums Moderator

5.0L Member


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 15,445 Threads: 472
 RLG34750's Country Flag  View RLG34750's 43 photos  View RLG34750's 2 classified ads  View RLG34750's HomePage
Palm Bay   Florida
Send a message via Yahoo to RLG34750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedez L. View Post
Does the GT-500 have the same size wheels on front and back?
The CTS-V has different size tires for the front and the back just like the Corvette. What is the reason for this as then you can't rotate the tires.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedez L. View Post
THIS ISN'T PRESENT ON THE STANDARD NEW mUSTANG gt IS IT?
ACTUALLY I INTERPRET THIS PART OF TIRE MAINTENANCE ..MAINTENACE FREE SINCE YOU CAN'T REALLY ROTATE. THE TIRES STAY WHERE THEY ARE AT LESS MAINTEANCE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedez L. View Post
But in the end both CAD and GT-500 KR are in the 4,000+ range both RWD and it looks like the CTS-V is the faster car in a straight line. Top speed not sure. Both cars are supercharged too.
So the CTS-V will blow the GT-500 KR away? It does kill the standard base Corvette.
We study the gravitational Faraday rotation, on linearly polarized light rays emitted by a pulsar, orbiting another compact object. We relate the rotation angle to the orbital phase of the emitting pulsar, as well as to other parameters describing its orbit and the orientation of the angular momentum of the binary companion. We give numerical estimates of the effect for the double-pulsar system, PSR J0737−3039, and note that the expected magnitude is exceedingly small, making the effect unlikely to be observed with present technology. It is, however, interesting per se since in this phenomenon gravito-magnetism plays a leading role, unlike what happens, for instance, when studying light bending or gravitational time delay, where it appears as a correction to the gravito-electric contribution. Also, we envisage the possibility that this effect could be relevant, at least in principle, for a pulsar orbiting a non-charged black hole.

and with regard to acceleration......

It is easy to verify that, if air resistence is negligable, all objects accelerate towards the earth at the same rate. This mystery, first verified experimentally by Galileo, is at least partially explained by Newton's law of gravity. The ``reason'' is that the gravitational force on an object is proportional to its inertial mass. According to Newton's second law, in order to calculate the acceleration of an object caused by gravity, we must take the gravitational force on that object and divide by the inertial mass. Thus, the inertial mass of the object cancels out of the resulting expression for the acceleration. In fact the acceleration of any object at the Earth's surface is determined by the distance of the object form the center of the Earth (RE), Newton's constant (G) and the mass of the Earth:


If you put the value of Newton's constant, the radius of the Earth ( 6 x 106 meters) and the mass of the Earth ( 6 x 1024kg) into the above expression you will get approximately 9.8m/s2, which is the rate at which all objects accelerate downwards at the surface of the Earth.

Although the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity, g, is the same everywhere on the Earth's surface, its direction changes depending on where you are. It is a vector that always points towards the center of the Earth, so, for example, it is in the opposite direction at the North Pole than at the South Pole. This effect is not very relevant to us because the Earth is so big. If we move from one end of the room to another, or even one end of the city to another, we are only moving across a very small fraction of the total circumference of the Earth, so the direction of the gravitational acceleration changes very little. Our notion of ``down'' only changes significantly when we travel very large distances. However, as we will see later, if you happen to be near a very massive, but small object, such as a black hole, the fact that gravitational acceleration changes direction depending on your location becomes very significant indeed: it gives rise to so-called tidal gravitational forces that can tear a spaceship apart in microseconds. Note that the rate at which objects accelerates towards the Earth changes with distance. We don't notice this because we are already so far from the center of the Earth (6 thousand kilometers) that we would have to move vertically a large distance to cause a significant change: for example, to decrease the acceleration due to gravity by half down to 4.9 m/s2 we would have to go out into space about 1500 km above the Earth's surface.


I use to be amazed now i'm only amused........
__________________
Reggie

Real Racers Don't Street Race

PERIOD.......

'88 LX Hatch With A Little Of This & A Little Of That......
10.39 @128 MPH Soon to be faster....
RLG34750 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #26 (permalink)
Black-n-Blue is offline Made Member


Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 334 Threads: 4
 Black-n-Blue's Country Flag  View Black-n-Blue's 65 photos  View Black-n-Blue's HomePage
Southwestern   Connecticut
Default

LMAO!!!!!

I think this Benz has a tow hitch!!!!
__________________
04' Crown Vic
99' Roush Stage 2
92' GT (526rwhp)
Black-n-Blue is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #27 (permalink)
shakerhood is offline Senior Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,293 Threads: 6
 shakerhood's Country Flag  View shakerhood's 7 photos
Pittsburgh   Pennsylvania
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedez L. View Post
But in the end both CAD and GT-500 KR are in the 4,000+ range both RWD and it looks like the CTS-V is the faster car in a straight line. Top speed not sure. Both cars are supercharged too.
So the CTS-V will blow the GT-500 KR away? It does kill the standard base Corvette.
Not sure what point you keep trying to make, if you are looking for a traditional style Musclecar then go with the Shelby, if you are looking for a 4 Door sports sedan then go with the Caddy!
shakerhood is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008   #28 (permalink)
Mercedez L. is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759 Threads: 59
 Mercedez L.'s Country Flag
San Francisco   California
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by spdjnky_42 View Post
The caddy is definetly a better car for quality and ride. The mustang probably wins in all the other aspects along w/ retail value.
The Caddy has a better suspension Zeta platform and has close to equal weight distribution front and back. The Magnetic Ride suspension as standard equipment on V model. The Mustang still has the live rear axle with more of the weight in front as it always has which will be a harder riding car.
Mercedez L. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008   #29 (permalink)
shabbyblue is offline Made Member


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 361 Threads: 114
 shabbyblue's Country Flag  View shabbyblue's 4 photos
San Jose   California
Default

You also have to think about which car will more aftermarket parts. My guess would be the GT500. Just my guess. I read somewhere that a K&N filter and a bigger pulley on the GT 500 can add 50 plus horses. So, that is something to think about which aftermarket will be better for which car. Oh yeah the Bay AREA is in the house.
shabbyblue is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008   #30 (permalink)
Mercedez L. is offline Made Member

5.0L Member


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759 Threads: 59
 Mercedez L.'s Country Flag
San Francisco   California
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by shabbyblue View Post
You also have to think about which car will more aftermarket parts. My guess would be the GT500. Just my guess. I read somewhere that a K&N filter and a bigger pulley on the GT 500 can add 50 plus horses. So, that is something to think about which aftermarket will be better for which car. Oh yeah the Bay AREA is in the house.
for the info. The car will stay in factory stock condition especially during the warranty period. I am not into moding and just prefer it to be right the way I want it straight from the factory.
Mercedez L. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shelby Gt 500 Owners - Help! APRAIZR Classic Talk 4 08-07-2008 12:29 PM
Seen a Shelby 500 yet? myfast05 2005+ Talk 15 11-08-2006 12:17 AM
70 boss 429 vs my 68 gt 500 Eleanor stangracer Kill Stories 11 10-22-2006 09:31 AM
Shelby GT 500 Colors FlaDriver 2005+ Talk 2 08-15-2005 12:39 AM

sponsors

Mustang Photos
Add to Favorites    Link to us    Contact    Directory    Site Rules    Archive    Terms of Use    Privacy    Top Sites    RSS    Meet Our Sponsors    Advertise   
AllFordMustangs is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company. ©Copyright 2002-2010 All Auto Enthusiasts Network

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110